06.05.2015 Views

Revised Final Environmental Study Report (24 MB) - Gold Canyon ...

Revised Final Environmental Study Report (24 MB) - Gold Canyon ...

Revised Final Environmental Study Report (24 MB) - Gold Canyon ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Gold</strong> <strong>Canyon</strong> Resources Inc.<br />

Springpole <strong>Gold</strong> Access Corridor Project<br />

<strong>Final</strong> <strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Study</strong> <strong>Report</strong><br />

Screening Criteria<br />

Tourism values X<br />

Aboriginal Considerations<br />

Net Effect<br />

Negative Effect (1) Positive Effect (1)<br />

Nil Unk<br />

High Med Low Low Med High<br />

Comments and Rationale<br />

Remoteness of the area marketability of tourism operators could be negatively impacted. This corridor is through a less developed<br />

region and would result in a greater cumulative impact for the region because it would duplicate the FMP-approved access corridor in<br />

the long-term. Increased access to lakes could be a positive effect if there are lodge owners seeking to convert to a drive-in mode of<br />

operation and access is authorized by MNR. Would potentially increase unwanted access to Birch Lake, a valued tourist lake, because<br />

this alternative comes to within several hundred metres of the shoreline. A road by GCU would increase access in this area where no<br />

roads are currently planned by any other interests (i.e. First Nation, forestry company) that are known to GCU. There are more tourism<br />

operators on Birch Lake who expressed concerns regarding access to Birch Lake compared to Springpole Lake.<br />

First Nation reserves or<br />

communities<br />

X<br />

Increased employment and training, business, contracting opportunities, as described in Section 3.1. Potentially better emergency<br />

response capabilities due to improved access.<br />

Spiritual, ceremonial or<br />

cultural sites<br />

Traditional land or<br />

resources used for<br />

harvesting, activities<br />

X None are identified to date in vicinity of this corridor.<br />

X None are identified to date in vicinity of this corridor.<br />

Aboriginal values X No such values communicated to GCU to date by the engaged Aboriginal communities.<br />

Lands subject to land<br />

claims<br />

Other (Archaeological<br />

Sites)<br />

X<br />

X None are known.<br />

Based on desktop analysis by licensed professional archaeologist (no field work), there is an increased potential for archaeological<br />

values along this corridor (refer to Appendix 2). First Nation technicians participated in each archaeological field program. GCU will<br />

implement a Chance Find Procedure (refer to Definition of Terms and Acronyms) to further protect archaeological values.<br />

TOTAL 1 4 15 19 0 0 2 0<br />

(1) Refer to MNR (2003) for definition of the categories of positive and negative effects. http://www.mnr.gov.on.ca/en/Business/LUEPS/Publication/<strong>24</strong>5473.html<br />

July 2013 Page 12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!