06.05.2015 Views

Revised Final Environmental Study Report (24 MB) - Gold Canyon ...

Revised Final Environmental Study Report (24 MB) - Gold Canyon ...

Revised Final Environmental Study Report (24 MB) - Gold Canyon ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Gold</strong> <strong>Canyon</strong> Resources Inc.<br />

Springpole <strong>Gold</strong> Access Corridor Project<br />

<strong>Final</strong> <strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Study</strong> <strong>Report</strong><br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

This corridor is a southerly-trending road corridor on the west side of Springpole Lake that<br />

connects with existing forestry road network to the south (refer to Figure 2-1).<br />

The western corridor meets the objective of reliable year-round access to the area of the<br />

Deposit. Given the approved 2014-2019 FMP road to the east, the increased potential for<br />

cumulative effects to biological values, remoteness values and archaeological values in the<br />

region are emphasized with this option (refer to letter dated December 2012 from Horizon<br />

Archaeology to Appendix 2).<br />

This corridor would increase the likelihood of unwanted access directly to Birch Lake<br />

compared to the eastern corridor.<br />

If the Springpole <strong>Gold</strong> Project proceeds to production, environmentally progressive planning<br />

would require the mine site to be situated within one (1) watershed rather than straddling<br />

multiple watersheds to the extent practical. In the event that a production phase is proposed,<br />

this corridor does not lend itself well to a compact mine site within a single watershed that<br />

overlies and branches off to access the various mine site features. Furthermore, in order to<br />

minimize the overall development footprint on the landscape it would be desirable to have<br />

the access corridor overlap with the mine site features and this corridor alternative does not<br />

lend itself well to this sort of progressive planning.<br />

An analysis of the effects (positive and negative) associated with this alternative was undertaken in<br />

accordance with Section 3 of MNR (2003) and is presented in Table 2-1. Unless otherwise stated in<br />

Table 2-1, this analysis assumes that conventional, proven mitigation measures are applied to the<br />

alternative in accordance with applicable guidance documents from MNR and DFO that are<br />

referenced herein.<br />

July 2013 Page 8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!