06.05.2015 Views

Revised Final Environmental Study Report (24 MB) - Gold Canyon ...

Revised Final Environmental Study Report (24 MB) - Gold Canyon ...

Revised Final Environmental Study Report (24 MB) - Gold Canyon ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Gold</strong> <strong>Canyon</strong> Resources Inc.<br />

Springpole <strong>Gold</strong> Project<br />

Road Alternatives Assessment<br />

management focus on caribou, combined with the abundance of the late winter moose habitat,<br />

the significance of the potential environmental effects is low. Mitigation will involve avoiding<br />

moose wintering areas during access road construction where possible.<br />

Colonial bird nesting sites - The only colonial nesting birds located within the study area were<br />

Bonaparte’s gulls. There is little quantitative information on the effects of human activities on<br />

gulls, but Bonaparte’s gulls are considered to be intolerant of human activity (OMNR 2010),<br />

therefore the potential negative environmental effects are considered to be high. The effects of<br />

roads on Bonaparte’s gulls nesting is unknown, but the Stand and Site Guide (OMNR 2010)<br />

assumes disturbance will be similar to Great Blue Heron Rookeries, with roads affecting the<br />

location, size, and occupancy of colonies. Moreover, roads landings, and aggregate pits create<br />

large canopy gaps in forest surrounding nests. Significant colonial bird nesting sites are those<br />

that are the only known sites in the area, support several species of concern and have high<br />

numbers of species. Significant sites also have little disturbance, and a long history of use.<br />

Bonaparte’s gulls are not considered “at risk”, and are considered of moderate conservation<br />

concern. Therefore, the significance of the potential environmental effects on the nesting colony<br />

is considered to be low due to the fact that other nest sites occur throughout the area, the<br />

colony is in an area with moderate disturbance, and there are no species of concern or other<br />

known nesting species. Following the direction provided in the Stand and Site Guide (OMNR<br />

2010), a 150 m radius buffer will be maintained around the nesting colony to mitigate potential<br />

disturbance and allow for the retention of nesting habitat. The access road will be kept below<br />

the 20 m recommended maximum width in close proximity to the nesting colony site.<br />

Waterfowl stopover and staging areas - There are no known waterfowl stopover and staging<br />

areas within the RSA.<br />

Waterfowl nesting sites - A ring-necked duck nest was located near the Springpole camp. There<br />

are no species of waterfowl considered to be “at risk” in Canada or Ontario, however, ringnecked<br />

ducks are considered to be high priority for conservation planning (NAWMP 2004).<br />

There is very little information pertaining to the reactions of nesting waterfowl to road<br />

construction or the consequences of disturbance in general, but reactions are likely highlycontext<br />

specific (OMNR 2010). Ground nesting waterfowl such as ring-necked ducks tend not to<br />

flush from the nest until humans are very close (1-6m), therefore the Stand and Site Guide<br />

recommends a minimum of 10 m buffering distance of occupied nests (OMNR 2010). Potential<br />

nest sites for ring-necked duck are not considered rare within the RSA (grassy sites within 200<br />

m of water (OMNR 2010)). There is no evidence of nest fidelity in ring-necked ducks, nor does<br />

this site support large concentrations of nesting waterfowl, other species of conservation<br />

concern, or a variety of waterfowl species, therefore the significance of the potential<br />

environmental effects to nesting ring-necked ducks should be negligible and would require no<br />

mitigation.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!