05.05.2015 Views

INTEGRITY QUALITY SERVICE - Saha-Union Co., Ltd

INTEGRITY QUALITY SERVICE - Saha-Union Co., Ltd

INTEGRITY QUALITY SERVICE - Saha-Union Co., Ltd

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SAHA-UNION<br />

69<br />

the finance lease agreements amounted to Baht 68 million; and repaid deposits from related parties amounted<br />

to Baht 37 million. Moreover, the <strong>Co</strong>mpany had the cash received from short-term loans from financial institutions<br />

amounted to Baht 302 million; oversea subsidiaries received long-term loans from banks in China amounted to Baht<br />

2,283 million; and subsidiaries received payment for increase of capital to expand their business from shareholders<br />

with no participation in management amounted to Baht 78 million. In total, the net cash flow from financing activities<br />

was equal to Baht 1,482 million.<br />

After the summation of the above 3 activities, the <strong>Co</strong>mpany had the additional cash flow of Baht 2,709.74 million;<br />

and when summing up with the translation adjustments, the <strong>Co</strong>mpany’s cash flow has increased by Baht 70.32<br />

million (differences from foreign exchange rates) and when summing up with cash and cash equivalent at beginning<br />

of year brought forwards amounted to Baht 1,588.07 million, balance of cash and cash equivalent at end of year<br />

was equal to Baht 4,368.51 million, which was considered as having high liquidity.<br />

4.2.2 Significant Liquidity Ratios<br />

At year-end 2011, the <strong>Co</strong>mpany had the ratio of current assets to current liabilities of 3.26:1 and the ratio of quick<br />

liquidity to current liabilities of 2.61:1, indicating that the <strong>Co</strong>mpany was able to convert the liquid assets to cash in<br />

order to fully repay the current liabilities and still had the surplus liquidity of 1.61 times, indicating that the <strong>Co</strong>mpany<br />

and its subsidiaries still had sufficient financial liquidity.<br />

Regarding the management of its account receivables and account payables, the <strong>Co</strong>mpany had the average<br />

period of debt collection of 55 days, which was equal to the previous year and approximately equivalent to the<br />

credit term that the <strong>Co</strong>mpany has given to its account receivables. Moreover, the <strong>Co</strong>mpany had the cash cycle<br />

as from the date of payment of raw materials, including the date of selling the products until the date of receiving<br />

the product payment equal to 36 days, which was faster than the previous year of 39 days per cycle, as though<br />

the <strong>Co</strong>mpany and its subsidiaries had approximately 10 cash cycles in 1 year.<br />

In 2011, the <strong>Co</strong>mpany and its subsidiaries had the rate of operating profits to total incomes equal to 10.91%, which<br />

was lower than 21.98% last year due to 3 major factors. First, the <strong>Co</strong>mpany’s components of gross profit fell down by<br />

4.83% as a result of a change in business type of the <strong>Co</strong>mpany’s branch as mentioned earlier. Second, there was<br />

no special profit generated only once from sale of a part of land owned by a subsidiary, causing the components to<br />

decrease by 5.0%. Finally, profit shares from associated companies decreased, causing the components to decrease<br />

by 2.66%. The main reason was the record of loss from the power plant owned by Yunnan Energy Qujing-<strong>Union</strong><br />

Power <strong>Co</strong>., <strong>Ltd</strong>., with details mentioned earlier under the topic Operating Profits.<br />

Regarding the policy of financial structure, the <strong>Co</strong>mpany had the debt-to-equity ratio of 0.33:1, which was slightly<br />

better than 0.21:1 in the previous year, indicating that the financial structure with the sources of money from the<br />

creditor’s equity was very limited when compared to the sources of money from shareholder’s equity; therefore,<br />

the <strong>Co</strong>mpany still had good opportunities to spend the sources of capital from the creditors in new projects (if any)<br />

because the ratio of liabilities was still very low.<br />

Moreover, the <strong>Co</strong>mpany and its subsidiaries had the interest coverage ratio of 55.45 times, indicating that the<br />

<strong>Co</strong>mpany and its subsidiaries had sufficient current cash flow to fully repay the interest to creditors<br />

The <strong>Co</strong>mpany had the rates of returns to the shareholder’s equity of 4.94%, which was higher than the rates of<br />

returns when compared to the interest rates of the fixed savings accounts of financial institution if considering<br />

the dividends expected to be paid to shareholders at the rate of Baht 1.50 per share, or 59.18% of the net profits<br />

under the cost method, which was in accordance with the <strong>Co</strong>mpany’s policy of rates of dividend payment, at least<br />

one-third of the net profits under the cost method.<br />

4.2.3 Short-Term Liabilities Repayment Period which affects the <strong>Co</strong>mpany’s Liquidity<br />

The <strong>Co</strong>mpany and its subsidiaries had the short-term loans amounted to Baht 449.59 million and some portions of<br />

long-term loans, which shall be payable within 1 year, amounted to Baht 226.71 million; and some portions of liabilities<br />

under the finance lease agreements, which shall be payable within 1 year, amounted to Baht 60.82 million; deposit from<br />

related parties amounted to Baht 40.74 million; income tax payable amounted to Baht 45.19 million; and other current<br />

liabilities amounted to Baht 57.73 million, totaling Baht 880.78 million which may be payable within 1 year; however,<br />

when comparing the liquid assets, cash and cash equivalent, and the instant temporary investments, amounted to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!