Minutes UIPM Congress 2010 Riga FINAL 6 12 2010

More documents

Recommendations

Info

As accepted at the 2008 UIPM Congress the Executive Board submitted motions to allow further changes due to the impact of the Combined Event on the overall competition as described in STATUTES rule 6.1: Within the competences of the General Assembly as defined by Art 14 and 17 of the Statutes of the UIPM lie in particular: k) to decide on Competition Rules in the year of the Olympic Games, in other years only in cases of force majeure; several motions are proposed because of force majeure. General aspects MOTION 5: Rule 1.6.Order of the Events: Reason: Concerning minimum warm up period affecting the combined event and the other ones 1.6.3 i) The LOC must provide pentathletes with a minimum warm-up period before each event as follows: Fencing: 30 mins, Swimming: 20 mins, Riding: 20 mins, Combined event: 20 minutes running and shooting. The warm-up period is considered to be an integral part of the competition. In the competition Finals, the warm-up areas are only at the disposal of those participants that have qualified for the Finals. ii) Coaches can assist the athletes in the warming up periods, but they must leave the FOP directly after the end of the warm up and before the start of the events and go to the designated areas (in Riding they can assist until the entrance to the competition arena). YES NO ABS 41 Motion passed. MOTION 6: Rule 1.20.2 Competition Results: Reason: Necessity to rule on this matter as it is an ORIS requirement (force majeure) 1.20.2 If there is a tie in the total score or it is impossible to determine who crossed the finish line first, the winner is the pentathlete or team who has gained more first places in the five events. If there is still a tie, the pentathletes or team that won the Combined event will be declared the winner. 1.20.2 i) If there is a tie in the total score or it is impossible to determine who crossed the finish line first, the athlete who is placed higher is the pentathlete or team who has gained more first places in the five events. If there is still a tie, the pentathlete or team that was best placed on the Combined event will be placed in the higher position ii) If there is a tie between 2 or more athletes after 2 events, and in order to establish the start order for Riding, the best placed in Fencing will be placed in the higher position; if there is still a tie, iii) The athlete with the best Swimming time will be placed higher; if the tie remains, the PWR position will decide. 1.20.4 Teams with 3 athletes competing in the Final are placed ahead of teams with 2 athletes in the final; teams with 2 athletes competing in the final are placed before teams with only 1 athlete in the final; teams with no athletes in final are placed last. (Old1.20.4 becomes 1.20.5 and old 1.20.5 becomes 1.20.6) YES NO ABS 41 2010 UIPM Congress Page 10
Motion passed. MOTION 7: Rule 1.21.2 Levels of UIPM competitions Reason: To make the PWR position clearer when athletes have equal points. Tie-Breaker Applied to PWR The UIPM publisheds PWR list at the end of each international competition will normally only break ties of PWR points for the first 64 positions; however, upon specific request by a National Federation, for valid reason, the UIPM shall apply the tie-breaker rule for any position held by an pentathlete of that National Federation and report the results to that National Federation. the updated PWR at the end of each month. - In the PWR, if two or more pentathletes have accumulated an equal amount of PWR points, the pentathlete who is placed ahead higher is the one who collected more PWR points in the most recent World Championships Finals - If the amount of PWR points still remains equal, the pentathlete who is placed ahead higher is the one who collected more PWR points in the most recent World Championship qualification round. Semifinals. - If the amount of PWR still remains equal (the concerned athletes didn’t participate in the last WCh), the pentathlete who is placed ahead higher is the one that participated in the highest number of competitions included in the current ranking PWR. - If the amount of PWR still remains equal, the pentathlete placed higher is the one with the best result in the last competition included in the current PWR. YES NO ABS 41 Motion passed. MOTION 8: Rule 2.14.2 The Second group of offences Reason: The rule need to be updated according to FIE rules 2.14.2 The second group of offences in the first and any further infringement is penalised by indicating a Red Card (deduction of 12 MP points each). Second Gr. OFFENCE Article First Offence Interruption of bout by claimed injury not confirmed by Doctor on duty 2.10.10 iv Absence of weapon check marks (*) 2.6.2 iv Red Use a non-sword hand / arm (*) 2.10.8 i Card Deliberate hit not on opponent (*) 2.11.3 i Dangerous, violent or vindictive action, blow with guard or pommel or mask 2.10.5 ix Second Offence Red Card Third& Subseq Red Card 2010 UIPM Congress Page 11
Page 1 and 2: MINUTES 6 November 2010 - SESSION 1
Page 3 and 4: 4. Approval of the minutes of the 2
Page 5 and 6: 9. Adoption of the budget plan 2010
Page 7 and 8: further. Ms. Georgina Harland refer
Page 9: MOTION 4: Rule B.5.21 Laser System
Page 13 and 14: Motion passed. Riding MOTION 10: Ru
Page 15 and 16: Handicap start, approx. 20m run, 5
Page 17 and 18: YES NO ABS 41 Motion passed. MOTION
Page 19 and 20: PENALTY TABLE COMBINED EVENT Append
Page 21 and 22: B 4.12 Obstacles B.4.12.13 A double
Page 23 and 24: Starting before the signal is given
Page 25 and 26: 15. Elections Further to the candid

Minutes UIPM Congress 2010 Riga FINAL 6 12 2010

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?