A Users' Guide to Measuring Local Governance

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 37: RTA Index – Examples of “critical points” of corruption, anti-corruption mechanisms and indicators for three competence areas of local government URBAN PLANNING “critical points” of corruption anticorruption mechanisms Indicators Scoring of indicators Development, adoption and revision of a General Urban Plan (GUP) and Detailed Urban Plan (DUP) without the participation of a participative body Setting up a qualified Participative body and its direct and active participation in the development and revision of the GUP and DUP Minutes from the work of the Participative body, number of negative opinions from competent organisations on the proposed versions of GUP and DUP There are minutes confirming the active participation of the Participative body >3 points There are minutes, no confirmation of active participation of the Participative body > 2 points There are no minutes >>> 1 point FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND PROPERTY “critical points” of corruption anticorruption mechanisms Indicators Scoring of indicators Non-transparent procedure for development and adoption of the municipal budget, without the participation of the public and experts Participation of the public and experts in the process of planning and development of the municipal budget, as well as consultations with the public and experts Degree of participation of the public and experts in budget preparation and access to information regarding the budget The budget preparation is publicised, there is participation of the public >3 points The budget preparation is publicised, there is no participation of the public >2 points The budget preparation is not publicised >1 point PUBLIC PROCUREMENT “critical points” of corruption anticorruption mechanisms Indicators Scoring of indicators Defining the technical specification of the goods and services in a way that favours a certain supplier Detailed technical specification of the goods or services is defined clearly and is an integral part of the tender documentation, without specifying a specific trade name or brand Existence of a precise technical specification of the goods and services in the tender ocumentation, documentation that stated the trade name or brand There is always a precise technical specification >3 points There is a precise technical documentation in most of the cases >2 points There is a precise technical documentation in some of the cases >1 point achieve two important goals – to decrease to a minimum the possibility for critical comments on the methodology or on the data collection process, and to train the staff of the municipality for future self-evaluations. This tool being designed as a self-evaluation tool to be implemented by various actors, the intention is for trained professional agencies and mixed teams, including nongovernmental stakeholders and the municipality itself, will implement the second round of assessments. Results reporting format The RTA Index is to be created at two levels in every municipality: • a separate RTA Index for the resistance to corruption in specific areas such as urban planning, public procurement, and financial management. • An overall RTA Index for the resistance to corruption of the whole municipality, comprising all of the abovementioned areas. This level would allow comparison of the level of the resistance to corruption among the different municipalities. 136 UNDP Oslo Governance Centre
Gender focus Not explicit. Poverty focus Not explicit. Strengths Based on the first results from the field test, the methodology is proving to be very practical and simple to implement; it gives objective, indisputable results. • Instead of measuring the perceptions or prevalence of corruption as most corruption assessment methods do, the Index is pragmatically oriented towards measuring resistance to corruption. This makes it possible to take into account the sensitivities related to combating corruption by not declaring municipalities as corrupt, but rather measuring the efforts invested in preventing corruption. • Innovative use of perceptions in the design of the methodology: Corruption perceptions from citizens and local officials, instead of being used as indicators, are used to design the methodology, i.e to identify corruption hot spots and appropriate anti-corruption mechanisms in the local context.This approach ensures that people’s inputs are sought, while not compromising the objectivity of all (fact-based) indicators. Weaknesses Not explicit, given that the tool is still in a pilot phase. Coverage To date the Index has been tested in four municipalities. Timeline 2008, on going. Where to find it http://europeandcis.undp.org/governance/show/E0665B63-F203-1EE9-B2237737A3E4BC48 UNDP – Macedonia Address: 8-ma Udarna Brigada Str.2, 1000 Skopje, Macedonia Tel: + 389 - 2 - 3249 500 Fax: + 389 – 2 – 3249 505 Web Site: www.undp.org.mk E-mail: registry.mk@undp.org A Users’ Guide to Measuring Local Governance 137
Page 1:
A Users’ Guide to Measuring Local
Page 5 and 6:
Contents Acknowledgements Acronyms
Page 7 and 8:
Acknowledgements AUTHORS Alexandra
Page 9 and 10:
Introduction This Guide is intended
Page 11:
1 Assessments of Local Governance
Page 14 and 15:
Decentralized governance for develo
Page 16 and 17:
and local specificity. In order to
Page 18 and 19:
A critical step in developing an as
Page 20 and 21:
Box 5. Key phases in a governance a
Page 22 and 23:
achieve the results. These can incl
Page 24 and 25:
Gender-sensitivity in governance is
Page 26 and 27:
1.11 Key contextual factors influen
Page 28 and 29:
findings of the assessment in ways
Page 30 and 31:
for union parishads (UPs) comprise
Page 32 and 33:
Box 14. Short-, Medium- and Long-Te
Page 35 and 36:
Voices from the Trenches 2 2.1 Choo
Page 37 and 38:
governments, and representatives of
Page 39:
the assessment - in terms of social
Page 43 and 44:
Case Studies 3 The following four f
Page 45 and 46:
Case Study 2: Moving from governmen
Page 47 and 48:
Case Study 3: Balancing comparabili
Page 49 and 50:
Case Study 4: Ensuring uptake of as
Page 51 and 52:
References • Aberbach, J.D. and R
Page 53 and 54:
Source Guide
Page 55 and 56:
The summary matrix also indicates w
Page 57 and 58:
Summary matrix: Main features of to
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Table 3: UGI sub-indices and indica
Page 67 and 68:
Weaknesses • While the UGI helps
Page 69 and 70:
Table 4: Local Governance Barometer
Page 71 and 72:
Table 5: Scale to assess local gove
Page 73 and 74:
Jean-Michel Dufils, PACT (Madagasca
Page 75 and 76:
Table 6: Principles and indicators
Page 77 and 78:
Where to find it The initiative is
Page 79 and 80:
Table 7: Local Democracy Assessment
Page 81 and 82:
Poverty focus Not explicit. The onl
Page 83 and 84:
Local governance performance measur
Page 85 and 86:
Europe. They have first been used i
Page 87 and 88:
Table 9: Methodological Guidelines
Page 89 and 90:
7 Governance Index (Indonesia) Prod
Page 91 and 92:
Table 12: Example of form for colle
Page 93 and 94: Where to find it The initiative is
Page 95 and 96: Table 15: MIDAMOS’s themes, indic
Page 97 and 98: Table 17: Grading System Qualificat
Page 99 and 100: Table 18: Framework of module on
Page 101 and 102: Key actors/stakeholders The initial
Page 103 and 104: Table 20: Indicators belonging to t
Page 105 and 106: y the State and the municipality as
Page 107 and 108: 11 Council of Europe’s Guide to D
Page 109 and 110: Table 25: Evaluation and comments f
Page 111 and 112: 12 Citizen Report Cards (CRC) Produ
Page 113 and 114: Box 5: Citizen Report Card applicat
Page 115 and 116: 13 Social Audit of Local Governance
Page 117 and 118: Box 7: Sample indicators for Social
Page 119 and 120: 14 Social Audit of Governance and D
Page 121 and 122: Box 8: Report extract - The Social
Page 123 and 124: Table 26: Themes and issues analyse
Page 125 and 126: 15 Local Governance Self-Assessment
Page 127 and 128: Table 27: EXAMPLES OF KEY ISSUES FR
Page 129 and 130: 16 Governance for Local Development
Page 131 and 132: Coverage Following the pilot testin
Page 133 and 134: Table 32: PBGS in Uganda, Tanzania
Page 135 and 136: Table 34: Nepal - Summary of the st
Page 137 and 138: Manual for assessment of Minimum Co
Page 139 and 140: Table 35: LGPMS - perfofrmance them
Page 141 and 142: Coverage The LGPMS was field-tested
Page 143: 19 Index of Responsibility, Transpa
Page 147 and 148: Table 39: Dimensions for the standa
Page 149 and 150: 21 Local Integrity Initiative Produ
Page 151 and 152: Table 42: Integrity Indicator score
Page 153 and 154: Figure 6: 2008 Scorecard Summary: L
Page 155 and 156: Table 43: Two examples of questions
Page 157: Where to find it Users’ Guide & s
show all

A Users' Guide to Measuring Local Governance

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?