05.05.2015 Views

A Users' Guide to Measuring Local Governance

A Users' Guide to Measuring Local Governance

A Users' Guide to Measuring Local Governance

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Box 6:<br />

Preliminary research in four municipalities <strong>to</strong> support the development of the Social Audit<br />

on <strong>Local</strong> <strong>Governance</strong> for Bosnia and Herzegovina<br />

This qualitative research was conducted by Prism Research in 2006 and involved 4 municipalities in BiH. The goal was<br />

<strong>to</strong> obtain information about specific characteristics of services financed by the local municipality and <strong>to</strong> generate<br />

indica<strong>to</strong>rs that measure citizens’ satisfaction with the quality of services, along with providers’ self-evaluation of<br />

service provision. In each municipality a different sec<strong>to</strong>r was investigated:<br />

• <strong>Local</strong> governance (satisfaction with local government, its quality and reliability; transparency; access <strong>to</strong> decision<br />

making processes and participation; responsiveness of local government; social capital; public finances)<br />

• <strong>Local</strong> roads (local road building; local road maintenance; winter road maintenance; signalization and drainage; work<br />

and communal inspection services)<br />

• Services of day-care centres (infrastructure; personnel; educational program; hygiene; medical services; evaluation<br />

of the quality of services; collection of charges and financing)<br />

• Waste collection and removal (work of the service provider and its infrastructure; municipal coverage; frequency of<br />

solid waste removal; unregulated rubbish dumping; financing of solid waste collection services<br />

The information was collected from citizens, civil society organizations, local governments, community representatives,<br />

and local service providers. Data collection was done through focus group discussion and face-<strong>to</strong>-face in-depth<br />

interviews. The table below shows the indica<strong>to</strong>rs generated by users and providers during the research in the<br />

Municipality of Donji Vakuf, on the theme of local governance, and the results from the community performance scorecard<br />

and providers’ self-evaluation scorecard.<br />

Indica<strong>to</strong>r<br />

Group Grade<br />

No. Users Providers Users Providers<br />

1 Satisfaction with the work of the local authorities<br />

and municipal agencies<br />

Satisfaction with the work of the local authorities<br />

and municipal agencies<br />

2 5<br />

2 Engagement by local community representatives Engagement by local community representatives 1 2<br />

3 Citizens’ participation in MZ (Neighbourhood<br />

council - Mjesna zajednica) sessions<br />

Citizens’ participation in MZ sessions 2 2<br />

4 - Citizens’ Participation in NGOs 2 4<br />

5 Dispersion of municipal councillors (their place of<br />

residence) throughout the municipality<br />

Dispersion of municipal councillors (their place of<br />

residence) throughout the municipality<br />

2 5<br />

6 - Proportion of those who receive and who are<br />

(concerned with information MEANING?)<br />

2 5<br />

7 Number of formal requests for information Number of formal requests for information 1 1<br />

Source: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTSOCACCDEMSIDEGOV/Resources/Prism_SocialAudi<strong>to</strong>fLGinBiH_QualitativeReport.pdf<br />

108 UNDP Oslo <strong>Governance</strong> Centre

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!