A Users' Guide to Measuring Local Governance
A Users' Guide to Measuring Local Governance
A Users' Guide to Measuring Local Governance
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Box 6:<br />
Preliminary research in four municipalities <strong>to</strong> support the development of the Social Audit<br />
on <strong>Local</strong> <strong>Governance</strong> for Bosnia and Herzegovina<br />
This qualitative research was conducted by Prism Research in 2006 and involved 4 municipalities in BiH. The goal was<br />
<strong>to</strong> obtain information about specific characteristics of services financed by the local municipality and <strong>to</strong> generate<br />
indica<strong>to</strong>rs that measure citizens’ satisfaction with the quality of services, along with providers’ self-evaluation of<br />
service provision. In each municipality a different sec<strong>to</strong>r was investigated:<br />
• <strong>Local</strong> governance (satisfaction with local government, its quality and reliability; transparency; access <strong>to</strong> decision<br />
making processes and participation; responsiveness of local government; social capital; public finances)<br />
• <strong>Local</strong> roads (local road building; local road maintenance; winter road maintenance; signalization and drainage; work<br />
and communal inspection services)<br />
• Services of day-care centres (infrastructure; personnel; educational program; hygiene; medical services; evaluation<br />
of the quality of services; collection of charges and financing)<br />
• Waste collection and removal (work of the service provider and its infrastructure; municipal coverage; frequency of<br />
solid waste removal; unregulated rubbish dumping; financing of solid waste collection services<br />
The information was collected from citizens, civil society organizations, local governments, community representatives,<br />
and local service providers. Data collection was done through focus group discussion and face-<strong>to</strong>-face in-depth<br />
interviews. The table below shows the indica<strong>to</strong>rs generated by users and providers during the research in the<br />
Municipality of Donji Vakuf, on the theme of local governance, and the results from the community performance scorecard<br />
and providers’ self-evaluation scorecard.<br />
Indica<strong>to</strong>r<br />
Group Grade<br />
No. Users Providers Users Providers<br />
1 Satisfaction with the work of the local authorities<br />
and municipal agencies<br />
Satisfaction with the work of the local authorities<br />
and municipal agencies<br />
2 5<br />
2 Engagement by local community representatives Engagement by local community representatives 1 2<br />
3 Citizens’ participation in MZ (Neighbourhood<br />
council - Mjesna zajednica) sessions<br />
Citizens’ participation in MZ sessions 2 2<br />
4 - Citizens’ Participation in NGOs 2 4<br />
5 Dispersion of municipal councillors (their place of<br />
residence) throughout the municipality<br />
Dispersion of municipal councillors (their place of<br />
residence) throughout the municipality<br />
2 5<br />
6 - Proportion of those who receive and who are<br />
(concerned with information MEANING?)<br />
2 5<br />
7 Number of formal requests for information Number of formal requests for information 1 1<br />
Source: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTSOCACCDEMSIDEGOV/Resources/Prism_SocialAudi<strong>to</strong>fLGinBiH_QualitativeReport.pdf<br />
108 UNDP Oslo <strong>Governance</strong> Centre