A Users' Guide to Measuring Local Governance
A Users' Guide to Measuring Local Governance
A Users' Guide to Measuring Local Governance
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
12<br />
Citizen Report Cards (CRC)<br />
Producer<br />
PAC – Public Affairs Centre (Bangalore, India)<br />
His<strong>to</strong>ry<br />
Citizen Report Cards were first developed in 1994<br />
by the Public Affairs Centre, a Bangalore-based<br />
not-for-profit organisation. The first report card on<br />
Bangalore’s public agencies covered municipal<br />
services, water supply, electricity, telecom, and<br />
transport. Since then, PAC has brought out report<br />
cards on several other cities, rural services and also<br />
on social services such as health care.With support<br />
from the Asian Development Bank, it has also<br />
prepared a self-learning web-based course<br />
through which interested organisations could<br />
learn how <strong>to</strong> apply the Citizen Report Cards and<br />
develop their own questionnaires.<br />
Objectives<br />
The Citizen Report Cards aim <strong>to</strong>:<br />
• Collect citizen feedback on public services<br />
from actual users of a service (and not opinions<br />
from the general public) such as drinking<br />
water, health, transportation and education;<br />
• Assess the performance of individual service<br />
providers and/or compare performance across<br />
service providers;<br />
• Generate a database of feedback on services<br />
that is placed in the public domain.<br />
Applicability<br />
The CRC is usually used by civil society organizations<br />
<strong>to</strong> moni<strong>to</strong>r the performance of service delivery<br />
agencies in cities such as the municipal water<br />
supply company, the police department, and the<br />
electricity provider. Although it can be applied in<br />
any urban context and <strong>to</strong> any service-providing<br />
organisation, it appears <strong>to</strong> be more effective in<br />
influencing policy and improving performance in<br />
those situations where there is a tradition of civil<br />
society activism. In other words, it works best when<br />
governmental bodies are more willing <strong>to</strong> accept<br />
feedback from citizens as well as <strong>to</strong> take action,<br />
and where respondents are already familiar with<br />
survey exercises.<br />
Types and sources of data used<br />
Information is subjective as data are usually<br />
collected through household surveys, or, if more<br />
appropriate, through surveys of individuals,<br />
organisations or groups. Respondents are<br />
normally selected using a probability random<br />
sample. The focus of the survey remains the<br />
experience of different groups of users with<br />
particular service providers.<br />
Methodology<br />
Citizen Report Cards are a means <strong>to</strong> assess the<br />
public services of a city from the perspective of<br />
users. It is possible <strong>to</strong> focus the CRC on one or more<br />
services, as well as on one or more aspects of<br />
service delivery (such as availability, access, quality<br />
of service, incidence and resolution of problems<br />
and complaints, interaction with staff, corruption).<br />
A focus group discussion involving both service<br />
providers and users is organised in order <strong>to</strong> help in<br />
identifying the services and aspects of service<br />
delivery that should be included in the CRC. Data is<br />
collected through a random, representative<br />
sample of respondents. However, it is also<br />
recommended <strong>to</strong> include respondents from<br />
various sub-groups, for instance, both slum and<br />
non-slum households, in order <strong>to</strong> capture the<br />
experiences of both the poor and better-off<br />
sections of society. Therefore, stratified sampling is<br />
also used <strong>to</strong> some extent. Typically, respondents<br />
give information on aspects of government<br />
services on a numeric scale (e.g. –5 <strong>to</strong> +5, or 1 <strong>to</strong> 7).<br />
These ratings are then aggregated and averaged,<br />
and a summary measure is produced. The exercise<br />
is repeated regularly. Results are disseminated<br />
through the media and a follow-up meeting<br />
between the citizens and service providers.<br />
A Users’ <strong>Guide</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Measuring</strong> <strong>Local</strong> <strong>Governance</strong> 103