03.05.2015 Views

o_19kdfsn0q18e31dfraas1esh19vta.pdf

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Over the course of their lives, Rationals accumulate many such "powers." Occasionally they find<br />

unexpected uses for their talents: "Oh, you need someone who knows how to scuba dive?" "Oh,<br />

you need an expert in acupuncture?" "Oh, you need someone who can speak Esperanto?" Usually<br />

these announcements are greeted with surprise by the INT's acquaintances, who had never<br />

suspected that their colleague had such a strange card hidden up their sleeve. People<br />

subconsciously recognize this NT tendency to accumulate knowledge and abilities, and therefore<br />

the archetypal elderly, powerful, magical, male character is a Rational. Van Helsing is an example<br />

of this archetype. He exhibited a wide range of special knowledge and abilities, and the best<br />

example of his modern wizardry was his power of hypnosis.<br />

One of Van Helsing's duties was to repeatedly hypnotize a team member who had been partially—<br />

but not completely—transformed into a vampire. By this means, he was able to gain brief glimpses<br />

into Dracula's mind and track his movements. So here we have an example of how an unusual<br />

ability, held in reserve, can ultimately benefit an INTJ's group. Though not widely recognized or<br />

appreciated for all their skills, an INTJ may be able to make surprising contributions to a group.<br />

And now you have a reason to learn hypnotism.<br />

Leadership and Organization<br />

Van Helsing became the team leader by unofficial group consent. Nobody ever elected him; they<br />

simply recognized that he was the most qualified person and looked to him to direct their efforts.<br />

Here are some of the INTJ traits that made him a qualified leader:<br />

• Calmness and coolheadedness. By remaining steadfast in the face of setbacks and danger,<br />

Van Helsing kept everyone thinking clearly and even created a sense of group optimism.<br />

His self possession helped give his team members others a feeling of control over the<br />

situation that prevented despair.<br />

• Foresight. Van Helsing was able to predict long term consequences and guard against them.<br />

On more than one occasion, a team member pointed out the immediate benefits of taking a<br />

particular action, only to have Van Helsing point out the disastrous future consequences such<br />

a decision would have. For instance, after a major defeat Dracula decided to flee back to<br />

Transylvania. One of the team members wondered if they shouldn't just let him go and let<br />

the whole thing drop. But Van Helsing pointed out that one member of the group had been<br />

half-transformed into a vampire. Though she was still alive and human, she would become<br />

a true vampire if she died—even of old age. Van Helsing foresaw that even if this team<br />

member lived a happy, normal life for the next 60 years, she would inevitably become a<br />

member of the Undead when she died. That's taking the long view of the situation. Van<br />

Helsing also foresaw the larger consequences of failing to kill Dracula: "if we fail, [he may<br />

yet become] the father or furtherer of a new order of beings, whose road must lead through<br />

Death, not Life." INTJs, with their future orientation and big picture view of situations,<br />

often see the larger consequences of an action that others miss. This is a significant<br />

component of their leadership abilities.<br />

• Organization. Van Helsing was able to set up tasks for the group, taking into account<br />

potential sources of delay. He also personally made many of the travel arrangements for<br />

their journey to Transylvania to hunt down Dracula. One author has suggested that if an<br />

INTJ travels with an ITP, the INTJ will probably end up filling this role. 143 Although INTJs<br />

may not like "international opportunities" as much as the other Rationals, 144 they seem to be<br />

143 Jones & Sherman, 1997<br />

144 Myers, McCaulley, Quenk & Hammer, 1998

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!