03.05.2015 Views

o_19kdfsn0q18e31dfraas1esh19vta.pdf

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

• Was leader of the vampire hunting group (TJ leadership favored)<br />

• Few friendships (INTJs favored most, alas) 140<br />

"My life is a barren and lonely one, and so full of work that I have not had much time for<br />

friendships, but since I have been summoned to here by my friend John Seward I have<br />

known so many good people and seen such nobility that I feel more than ever, and it has<br />

grown with my advancing years, the loneliness of my life."<br />

• An observer commented on Van Helsing's style of speech, "His reply was in a way<br />

characteristic of him, for it was logical (T favored over F) and forceful (NTJ favored over<br />

NTP) and mysterious (I favored over E)." (This description fits INTJ best.)<br />

• Described as solemn, grave, stern, grim (INTJ favored) 141<br />

Van Helsing was one of the "soft" INTJs, and like Hercule Poirot (a detective who we will meet<br />

later), he had a knack for drawing people out. For instance, one young woman was worried about<br />

her husband's vampire-horror-induced mental problems, but was initially reluctant to confide them<br />

to Van Helsing. She quickly changed her mind, however: "But he was so sweet and kind, and he<br />

had promised to help, and I trusted him." She also recalled about him, "I feel from having seen him<br />

that he is good and kind and of a noble nature." At other points in the book, Van Helsing was<br />

described as tender, earnest, pitying and gentle. One might be tempted to explain these traits by<br />

suggesting that he was a Feeler. However, as we have noted, Van Helsing fits many Rational traits<br />

and was metaphorically compared on various occasions to marble, iron and ice—frozen, hard, and<br />

unyielding substances. No, Van Helsing is no Feeler, but rather a nice Thinker. This sort of thing<br />

tends to fly in the face of the INTJ stereotype that floats around on the web, but it is fairly typical.<br />

Vampire Hunting Style<br />

Van Helsing unique INTJ traits made him well suited to killing vampires. His specialized<br />

knowledge and open-mindedness made him the first person to recognize the symptoms of vampiric<br />

feeding; he also equipped, organized, and directed the team effort to kill Dracula. Let's look at<br />

some of the skills that INTJs bring to the projects they take part in, as applied to the context of<br />

vampire hunting.<br />

First to Believe the Impossible<br />

One distinctive trait that characterized Van Helsing was open mindedness. He did not shrink from<br />

entertaining unlikely hypotheses just because they were widely considered impossible. Rationals<br />

have an instinctive understanding that just because everyone agrees unanimously on a fact doesn't<br />

make it true. However, this NT skepticism usually takes the form of refusing to buy into mass<br />

superstitions. This was reversed in Van Helsing's case; he refused to buy into the scientific<br />

community's unanimous insistence that if something couldn't be positively proved—such as a<br />

superstition—then it must not be true at all. We cannot prove that either aliens or God exist, but<br />

neither can we prove they don't; Van Helsing reasoned that vampires might exist for much the same<br />

reasons. He explained his position as follows, "I heard once of an American who so defined faith,<br />

'that faculty which enables us to believe things which we know to be untrue.' For one, I follow that<br />

man. He meant that we shall have an open mind, and not let a little bit of truth check the rush of the<br />

big truth, like a small rock does a railway truck. We get the small truth first. Good! We keep him,<br />

and we value him, but all the same we must not let him think himself all the truth in the universe."<br />

This is more of an INTP position than an INTJ position, but there are plenty of INTJ agnostics.<br />

140 Myers, McCaulley, Quenk & Hammer, 1998<br />

141 Thorne & Gough, 1991

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!