03.05.2015 Views

o_19kdfsn0q18e31dfraas1esh19vta.pdf

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Rational, I have very high standards and don't give praise readily. Go ahead and have fun; I much prefer<br />

the company of my own thoughts over tedious small talk.]<br />

So here we see a number of interesting INTJ characteristics.<br />

The NT tendency to set high standards and not be easily impressed is in evidence when Darcy<br />

describes Elizabeth merely as "tolerant, but not handsome enough to tempt me." (As you can<br />

imagine, Elizabeth wasn't exactly thrilled about this assessment of her person.) Compare this to Mr.<br />

Bingley's glowing ESFP description of the women in the room.<br />

Darcy preferred to dance (and socialize) only with partners whom he was particularly acquainted<br />

with; he saw no point in joining in otherwise. Choiniere & Keirsey (1992) have noted that<br />

Rationals aren't keen on dancing, and INTJs are quite happy to ruminate internally as a way to pass<br />

the time. If the real world can't compete with what's going on inside, then they'll just stand around<br />

enjoying the contents of their own skull. Again, compare this to the attitude of Mr. Bingley, who<br />

seemed to be enjoying the party to the full. This is why people say INTJs are "anti-social."<br />

When we compare the ESFP and INTJ attitudes, we see why INTJs tend to be chary of social<br />

gatherings:<br />

The manner in which they [Darcy and Bingley] spoke of the Meryton assembly was sufficiently<br />

characteristic. Bingley had never met with more pleasant people or prettier girls in his life; everybody<br />

had been most kind and attentive to him; there had been no formality, no stiffness; he had soon felt<br />

acquainted with all the room; and, as to Miss [Jane] Bennet, he could not conceive an angel more<br />

beautiful. Darcy, on the contrary, had seen a collection of people in whom there was little beauty and no<br />

fashion, for none of whom he had felt the smallest interest, and from none received either attention or<br />

pleasure. Miss [Jane] Bennet he acknowledged to be pretty, but she smiled too much.<br />

A very different outlook, no?<br />

What Did Darcy and Elizabeth See in Each Other?<br />

Since the ENFP/INTJ pairing has been featured so prominently in MBTI circles, it may be<br />

interesting to take a closer look at what Darcy and Elizabeth saw in each other.<br />

After Elizabeth realized she had been wrong in her grudge against Darcy, she began to take note of<br />

his good side. She quickly perceived that an ENFP/INTJ match could be a growth experience for<br />

both partners:<br />

She began now to comprehend that he was exactly the man who, in disposition and talents, would most<br />

suit her. His understanding and temper, though unlike her own, would have answered all her wishes. It<br />

was an union that must have been to the advantage of both; by her ease and liveliness, his mind might<br />

have been softened, his manners improved; and from his judgment, information, and knowledge of the<br />

world, she must have received benefit of greater importance.<br />

A commentator also described the mutual benefits of the match: 118<br />

Elizabeth and Darcy find what is difficult to find in a relationship—they share a love of conversation with<br />

each other and while they are very different, each completes the other. He offers her stability and<br />

strength, she helps him to laugh at himself and the world. He offers her passion and loyalty, she offers<br />

him devotion and a lively wit.<br />

The mutual satisfaction in conversation is often associated with the intuitive preference in a<br />

relationship. The INTJ provides inner strength and a deep, loyal love, while the ENFP provides<br />

fun, joy and warm affection.<br />

118 Why Women Love Mr. Darcy, 2012

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!