Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Stress, Sickness, Bad Habits<br />
• INTJs don’t get (mis)diagnosed with personality disorders as often as INTPs. 57<br />
• INTJs are much less likely to smoke than INTPs. 58<br />
• INTJs have more coping mechanisms than INTPs. 59<br />
• As a result of combat, INTJs are more likely to develop major depression, while INTPs are<br />
more likely to develop Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. 60<br />
Jobs<br />
• If you are typically dissatisfied with your job and tend to job hop a lot, then you are<br />
probably an INTP. INTPs are much less satisfied with their jobs than INTJs. 61<br />
• If you like and are confident in your ability to work with your hands, do outdoor work, do<br />
maintenance, perform construction, etc., then you are more likely to be an INTP than an<br />
INTJ. 62<br />
• If you are performing a job that entails the appreciation, consumption, or critique of art,<br />
literature, dance, poetry, etc., then you are more likely to be an INTP than an INTJ. If you<br />
are performing a job that involves analysis, problem solving, and research, then you are<br />
more likely to be an INTJ than an INTP. 63<br />
• INTJs are much more likely to be found in a leadership role than INTPs.<br />
Values<br />
• INTPs place a higher value on autonomy than INTJs. INTJs place a higher value on<br />
achievement than INTPs. 64<br />
• INTPs place a higher value on friendships than INTJs and tend to enjoy their friends more. 65<br />
School 66<br />
• INTJs enjoy school more than INTPs.<br />
• INTJs get better grades than INTPs.<br />
• INTJs tend to find school highly unstressful; INTPs tend to find school highly stressful.<br />
Recreation 67<br />
• INTPs tend to view writing as a fun leisure pastime; INTJs do not.<br />
• INTPs are slightly more likely to enjoy appreciating art than INTJs.<br />
57 Coolidge, Segal, Hook, Yamazaki & Ellet, 2001<br />
58 O'Toole, 1999<br />
59 Hammer in Myers, McCaulley, Quenk & Hammer, 1998<br />
60 Otis and Louks, 1997. This study did not have many INTJs, so the results should be treated with caution.<br />
61 Myers, McCaulley, Quenk & Hammer, 1998<br />
62 Myers, McCaulley, Quenk & Hammer, 1998<br />
63 Myers, McCaulley, Quenk & Hammer, 1998<br />
64 Myers, McCaulley, Quenk & Hammer, 1998<br />
65 Myers, McCaulley, Quenk & Hammer, 1998<br />
66 Myers, McCaulley, Quenk & Hammer, 1998<br />
67 Myers, McCaulley, Quenk & Hammer, 1998
Change language