03.05.2015 Views

o_19kdfsn0q18e31dfraas1esh19vta.pdf

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Virgins.” Whether this idea is true or not is questionable; INTPs have a similar stereotype, but are<br />

actually more likely to get married than average. 216 At any rate, INTs do seem more content to lead<br />

single lives than most types. Remember how INTs were the only types not to give “Home and<br />

family” the top rating? 217<br />

There is no particularly convincing evidence that Newton was ever in love. His biographers make<br />

much of this, seemingly unable to comprehend how a human being could go through life without<br />

even one romantic attachment. It is less difficult for me to understand, since I have never been in<br />

love myself. From my perspective, people appear rather fixated on the subject; not a day goes by<br />

where I do not encounter a human extolling or bewailing their love life in a conversation, song,<br />

movie, book etc. This is the equivalent of going to a modern art museum and encountering a group<br />

of people staring at a canvas with some random-looking lines smeared across it. They're weeping<br />

with emotion. “It's so beautiful. I-I've never seen anything more beautiful in my life! Now I can<br />

die happy. Isn't this the most wonderful thing you've ever seen?” I shrug and smile politely. “I'll<br />

take your word for it.” Theoretically I understand why they are so happy, but it is something that I<br />

do not relate to from personal experience.<br />

Though it is easy for me to see how Newton could have gotten by fine without a relationship, I'm<br />

not sure whether his feelings were similar to my own. There is a little bit of evidence that suggests<br />

that he had an actively suspicious attitude towards the opposite sex rather than just a meh neutral.<br />

Whatever the case may be, I expect that he didn't suffer from the lack of romance as much as one<br />

might expect.<br />

Organizations<br />

Newton ended up in charge of two organizations as president of the Royal Society and Warden<br />

(later, Master) of the Royal Mint. If you're wondering how he got to be in charge of the Mint, it<br />

basically went like this: Newton had been trying to get a job as anything but a professor at<br />

Cambridge for some time; his friends were helping him out by passing his name around. When the<br />

current Warden resigned, one of the people in his network said, “Hey, Newton's smart, right? Let's<br />

make him Warden.” So they did.<br />

Both organizations were in trouble when he arrived. The Royal Society was teetering on the verge<br />

of bankrupcy, and the Mint was far behind on a project of national importance.<br />

Newton fixed the Royal Society's problem by instituting a membership fee, selling some of the<br />

society's stock, and various other means. Such decisive moves were a hallmark of his leadership<br />

style, but they could also grate those who ended up feeling left out of the decision-making process.<br />

Considering his tendency to be suspicious and oversensitive to perceived rejection, it was perhaps<br />

only to be expected that he stifled debate as much as he could and ran the society with monarchical<br />

authority.<br />

One example of his heavyhanded approach occurred when Newton wanted to move the society's<br />

HQ to a new location. He called together the council, and basically told them, “We should move to<br />

a new location. I have reasons, but I'm not going to tell them to you. If you disagree, tough.<br />

Meeting adjourned.” The lack of discussion angered some council members, who wanted time to<br />

think the idea over. But the move was swiftly accomplished. Remember how the TJ group built the<br />

Lego man fastest, but also managed to alienate one member? Newton wasn't good at making<br />

people want to do what he said. He led by external force, not by inward motivation. That said, he<br />

216 Otis & Louks, 1997<br />

217 Myers, McCaulley, Quenk & Hammer, 1998

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!