Cyclone and Storm Surge - Iczmpwb.org
Cyclone and Storm Surge - Iczmpwb.org Cyclone and Storm Surge - Iczmpwb.org
6.11 (b) Medium rivers to armour the riverside slope (3:1) of embankments by providing 20 cm thick dry brick pitching over a layer of 10.0 cm to 12.5 cm thick jhama khoa filter with provision of brick sausage toe wall. (c) Embankments facing Bay of Bengal to armour riverside slope (5:1) by providing (2.0 m x 1.0 m x 0.3 m) C.C. Block over 15 cm thick layer of jhama khoa filter with provision of brick sausage toe wall. Data (a) For Embankments along Major & Medium Rivers (i) Average Ground Level = R.L. 2.00 m (GTS) (ii) Highest High Tide Level = R.L. 4.50 m (GTS) (considering flood season of 1976) (iii) Average High Tide Level = R.L. 3.80 m (GTS) to 3.00 m (GTS) (iv) Lowest Low Tide Level = R.L. (-) 1.80 m (GTS) to (-) 1.20 m (GTS) (b) For Embankments facing Bay of Bengal (i) Average Ground Level = R.L. 2.00 m (GTS) (ii) Highest High Tide Level = R.L. (+) 5.40 m (GTS) (iii) Average High Tide Level = R.L. (+) 4.50 m (GTS) (iv) Lowest Low Tide Level = R.L. (-) 2.00 m (GTS) Crest Level (a) For Major & Medium Rivers From the scheme "Urgent Development Works of Sundarban", the height of wave of major rivers has been taken as 1.60 m. Allowing free board of 0.6 m above wave, the actual free board measured from H.H.T.L. comes to (1.60 + 0.60) or 2.20 m. Hence the crest level of the embankment along major rivers = 4.50 m + 2.20 m = 6.70 m However, for major rivers under Kakdwip Irrigation Division the crest level has been fixed at 7.10 m (considering the locations of the embankments which are mostly nearer to Bay of Bengal). The crest level for all the medium rivers has been fixed at 6.40 m (considering the free board above wave as 0.3 m). (b) For Embankments facing Bay of Bengal As per guidelines of the "National Coastal Area Protection Project" (NCAPP), the height of wave has been taken as 2.20 m. Allowing free board of 0.60 m above wave, the actual free board measured from H.H.T.L. comes to (2.20 + 0.60) or 2.80 m.
6.12 Hence, the crest level of the embankment facing of Bay of Bengal or the sea dyke = 5.40 m + 2.80 m = 8.20 m Crest Width (a) For Major & Medium Rivers Based on "Urgent Development Works of Sundarban" the crest width of the proposed revetted embankment has been chosen as 3.00 m instead of 1.50 m (for only earthen embankment). (b) For Embankments facing Bay of Bengal As per the provision made in the "National Coastal Area Protection" Scheme, the crest width has been taken as 5.00 m. Riverside & Countryside Slope (a) For Major & Medium Rivers As per "Urgent Development of Sundarban Works Scheme, For major rivers the R.S. Slope is 4:1 For medium rivers the R.S. Slope is 3:1 However, in this scheme for major rivers the R.S. Slope has been taken as 3:1 barring some embankments near Bay of Bengal where 4:1 slope has been adopted. In all the above cases, the countryside slope has been provided as 2:1. (b) For Embankments facing Bay of Bengal As per suggestion made in the "National Coastal Area Protection " Scheme, the riverside slope should be 6:1. However, for all practical purposes the same has been kept in this scheme as 5:1. Of course, the countryside slope will be 2:1 as usual. Revetment on Riverside Slope (a) For Major & Medium Rivers In all the embankments along major rivers the revetment work has been proposed to be done by 32.5 cm thick dry brick pitching / 25 Cm thick brick pitching to be laid over 12.5 cm to 15.0 cm thick jhama khoa filter as has been provisioned in "Urgent Development Works of Sundarban Scheme executed earlier and the function of which has proved satisfactory.
- Page 120 and 121: 4.20 formulation. However, the rete
- Page 122 and 123: 4.22 ∂u ~ ∂ ~ ~ ∂ ~ ~ ∂ζ 1
- Page 124 and 125: 4.24 Δ p p(r) = p( ∞) − [1+ (r
- Page 126 and 127: 4.26 maximum surge for this event w
- Page 128 and 129: 4.28 U-Component of Velocity (Surfa
- Page 130 and 131: 4.30 ## ## ## #### ### ## ########
- Page 132 and 133: 4.32 V-component of Velocity (Surfa
- Page 134 and 135: 4.34 U-component of Velocity (Surfa
- Page 136 and 137: ## ################################
- Page 138 and 139: 4.38 V-Component of velocity (Surfa
- Page 140 and 141: 5.2 particular human settlement to
- Page 142 and 143: 5.4 The Composite Vulnerability Ind
- Page 144 and 145: 5.6 (2004 prices) prevalent in dist
- Page 146 and 147: 5.8 Moyna 0.6280 0.1592 0.542286 0.
- Page 148 and 149: 5.10 5.4.2. Social infrastructure H
- Page 150 and 151: 5.12 Budge-Budge(Part-II) 0.0000 0.
- Page 152 and 153: 5.14 secondary and tertiary activit
- Page 154 and 155: 5.16 F i Fˆ i ⎛ Total no. of =
- Page 156 and 157: 5.18 Table 5-4: Composite Index of
- Page 158 and 159: 5.20 M ′ = H M ′′ = I . S whe
- Page 160 and 161: Chapter Six Mitigation Strategies a
- Page 162 and 163: 6.3 Beside these differences in lev
- Page 164 and 165: 6.5 • to reduce the destructive f
- Page 166 and 167: 6.7 6.2.4. Methods of Construction
- Page 168 and 169: 6.9 is attached to the structure. T
- Page 172 and 173: 6.13 Likewise, in all the embankmen
- Page 174 and 175: 6.15 Figure 6 -5 Figure 6 -6 Figure
- Page 176 and 177: 6.17 Benefit cost ratio Area benefi
- Page 178 and 179: 6.19 Location and cost of proposed
- Page 180 and 181: 6.21 Swaraupnagar Swaraupnagar 100
- Page 182 and 183: 6.23 Gobadia Kakdwip Dk Kasiabad &
- Page 184 and 185: 6.25 Location and cost of proposed
- Page 186 and 187: 6.27 " Jagaddal " 800 6400000 " Jag
- Page 188 and 189: 6.29
- Page 190 and 191: 6.31
- Page 192 and 193: 6.33
- Page 194 and 195: 6.35 Figure 6 -11 Figure 6 -12
- Page 196 and 197: 6.37 Figure 6 -15 Figure 6 -16
- Page 198 and 199: 6.39 Figure 6 -19 6.2.7. Recommenda
- Page 200 and 201: 6.41 4. Rajraj Swarup & Ramnagar Ab
- Page 202 and 203: 6.43 project. Such sediment deficit
- Page 204 and 205: 6.45 paludosa, Rhizophora apiculata
- Page 206 and 207: 6.47 15. Ceriops tagal 0.22 0.40 0.
- Page 208 and 209: 6.49 shelterbelt (average 100 m wid
- Page 210 and 211: 6.51 (assuming land acquisition cos
- Page 212 and 213: 6.53 location are missing reducing
- Page 214 and 215: 7.2 resulted in large scale waterlo
- Page 216 and 217: 7.4 5. No adverse effect in drainin
- Page 218 and 219: 7.6 15 LT Panel L.S. 2,200,000 16 I
6.11<br />
(b) Medium rivers to armour the riverside slope (3:1) of embankments by providing 20 cm thick<br />
dry brick pitching over a layer of 10.0 cm to 12.5 cm thick jhama khoa filter with provision of brick<br />
sausage toe wall.<br />
(c) Embankments facing Bay of Bengal to armour riverside slope (5:1) by providing (2.0 m x 1.0<br />
m x 0.3 m) C.C. Block over 15 cm thick layer of jhama khoa filter with provision of brick sausage toe<br />
wall.<br />
Data<br />
(a) For Embankments along Major & Medium Rivers<br />
(i) Average Ground Level = R.L. 2.00 m (GTS)<br />
(ii) Highest High Tide Level = R.L. 4.50 m (GTS) (considering flood season of 1976)<br />
(iii) Average High Tide Level = R.L. 3.80 m (GTS) to 3.00 m (GTS)<br />
(iv) Lowest Low Tide Level = R.L. (-) 1.80 m (GTS) to (-) 1.20 m (GTS)<br />
(b) For Embankments facing Bay of Bengal<br />
(i) Average Ground Level = R.L. 2.00 m (GTS)<br />
(ii) Highest High Tide Level = R.L. (+) 5.40 m (GTS)<br />
(iii) Average High Tide Level = R.L. (+) 4.50 m (GTS)<br />
(iv) Lowest Low Tide Level = R.L. (-) 2.00 m (GTS)<br />
Crest Level<br />
(a)<br />
For Major & Medium Rivers<br />
From the scheme "Urgent Development Works of Sundarban", the height of wave of major rivers has<br />
been taken as 1.60 m. Allowing free board of 0.6 m above wave, the actual free board measured<br />
from H.H.T.L. comes to (1.60 + 0.60) or 2.20 m.<br />
Hence the crest level of the embankment along major rivers = 4.50 m + 2.20 m = 6.70 m<br />
However, for major rivers under Kakdwip Irrigation Division the crest level has been fixed at 7.10 m<br />
(considering the locations of the embankments which are mostly nearer to Bay of Bengal).<br />
The crest level for all the medium rivers has been fixed at 6.40 m (considering the free board above<br />
wave as 0.3 m).<br />
(b)<br />
For Embankments facing Bay of Bengal<br />
As per guidelines of the "National Coastal Area Protection Project" (NCAPP), the height of wave has<br />
been taken as 2.20 m. Allowing free board of 0.60 m above wave, the actual free board measured<br />
from H.H.T.L. comes to (2.20 + 0.60) or 2.80 m.