The Archaeology of Britain: An introduction from ... - waughfamily.ca

The Archaeology of Britain: An introduction from ... - waughfamily.ca The Archaeology of Britain: An introduction from ... - waughfamily.ca

waughfamily.ca
from waughfamily.ca More from this publisher
03.05.2015 Views

The industrial revolution • 289 • the Coventry Canal. Such portability makes it very difficult to interpret the archaeological evidence for steam engines on the basis of site remains alone. The vast majority of engines do not survive in situ, and those engine bases that do survive may have been modified either as their engines were adapted, or replaced, and as engines became smaller and less dependent upon built features such as engine houses. By contrast, engine houses do tend to survive. The Cornish pumping engine was a higher pressure, single acting engine developed specifically for mining. An archaeological survey of such engine houses in Cornwall has produced a methodology for classifying them as a single building type within the wider context of crushers, waste heaps and mines that survive in the Cornish landscape (Johnson et al. 1995) (Figure 16.5). Cornish mining technology was very distinctive, and was exported to other parts of the world in the nineteenth century, including South Australia, where Cornish-style engine houses may still be seen today. In contrast to steam, remains of the gas and electricity industries survive somewhat better, although they are increasingly under threat, and should also be seen as relevant to the study of the industrial revolution. The way in which the Ironbridge power stations, opened respectively in 1932 and 1969, were designed, built, and altered through Figure 16.5 Engine house, Cornwall. Source: Kate Clark time, and the associated impact on the local landscape, which already had a long history of industrialization, are explored by Stratton (1994). The application of power to industrial processes provides a context for the development of the factory system whereby production became highly organized, and labour specialized. Textiles The most potent symbol of the factory system is the multistorey textile mill, with its steam engine or waterwheel powering several floors of spinning machinery. The spinning and weaving of woollen cloth and the production of lace and hosiery were common amongst the textile industries in Britain in the early part of the eighteenth century. However, major innovations in textile machinery for spinning yarn, culminating in spinning mules of over 1,000 spindles, revolutionized the scale of yarn production. Weaving remained hand operated, often in association with spinning mills, until the development of an effective power loom in the early nineteenth century. It was the displacement of once highly skilled hand loom workers that generated the Luddite machine smashing, exacerbated by the depression following the Napoleonic wars. Many of these developments applied to cotton, but were extended to woollen production, hosiery and lace. The textile mill buildings provide a graphic illustration of the changing nature of textile production, and stand as one of the most visible reminders of the industrial revolution. Early

• 290 • Kate Clark production took place in the home, assisted by factors who purchased materials in bulk, and ‘put out’ work. Large windows on the top storeys of buildings in many small towns, such as Newtown, Powys, indicate that lofts were used for weaving. The earliest purpose-built mills, such as Lombe’s factory in Derby, were well lit, five storeys high, long and narrow, with line shafting to carry power from an engine, and lots of repetitive spaces supported by brick or cast iron columns. Because they were vulnerable to fire, most of the earliest mills have now been burnt down or altered almost beyond recognition. Most were simple, brick structures, and although largely functional, the use of classical detailing such as pediments and clock towers became common. Such buildings were generally located on streams, and thus concentrated in areas where water power was available. In the 1780s a form of fireproof construction, involving cast-iron beams and shallow brick jack arches, was developed. This was used at Stanley Mill in Gloucestershire, a ‘fire proof ’ woollen mill, where the use of Palladian windows and decorative cast iron also illustrates the architectural pretension of the mill complex. Steam was applied to spinning in 1785, making possible factory buildings in towns, close to sources of labour and materials. The mill buildings of the Ancoats area in Manchester exemplify the way in which urban areas became transformed by concentrations of multistorey textile complexes, although there is plentiful evidence to show that ‘out-working’ persisted as a mode of operation (by the mid-nineteenth century only half the textile workers operated in factories). A survey of Yorkshire textile mills places rural water-powered mills in their landscape context, and demonstrates the importance of looking at where and how mills were built as well as studying the buildings themselves (Giles and Goodall 1992). It is easy to forget that mills were usually only one element in a large industrial complex that might include single-storey weaving sheds, dye houses, engine houses, carding buildings, offices and a multitude of other small structures needed for the factory’s operation. In Manchester, the huge textile warehouses represent the role of marketing and distribution in the industry. At Saltaire in Bradford, West Yorkshire, the mill became part of a social experiment where the mill owner, Titus Salt, built rows of houses for employees, adding a church, hospital, baths and schools. Such structures are usually very vulnerable, and archaeology can play a role in ensuring that the more obvious structures are placed in their context. Building technology Textile mills are only one of a wide range of new building types that began to appear in the late eighteenth century as a result of industrialization. Some categories were very specific and a direct reflection of the process they housed, such as iron furnaces or gas holders, whilst other buildings depended upon a vocabulary of features that were designed to provide light, shelter, access, fireproofing and perhaps power for industrial processes. Building technology evolved rapidly as early building types were found to be unsuitable for industrial processes, and often burnt down or were shaken to bits. The introduction of iron to support buildings, fire-proofing, and new construction techniques involving the use of concrete and rolled steel, zig-zag north light roofs to bring in more light, and the use of steel framing all created extraordinarily innovative buildings. It should not be assumed that all such buildings were purely functional and without pretension. The earliest eighteenth-century factories made use of the Palladian idiom in their deployment of pediments and ornate roofs, and the industrial buildings of the Victorian period—such as the Egyptian style Temple Mill—illustrate all of the major themes in the architecture of the period. Workers’ housing Industries depended upon people, and many historians have commented upon the population changes in Britain during the period of industrialization. The population grew, and the centres of

• 290 • Kate Clark<br />

production took place in the home, assisted by factors who purchased materials in bulk, and ‘put<br />

out’ work. Large windows on the top storeys <strong>of</strong> buildings in many small towns, such as Newtown,<br />

Powys, indi<strong>ca</strong>te that l<strong>of</strong>ts were used for weaving. <strong>The</strong> earliest purpose-built mills, such as Lombe’s<br />

factory in Derby, were well lit, five storeys high, long and narrow, with line shafting to <strong>ca</strong>rry<br />

power <strong>from</strong> an engine, and lots <strong>of</strong> repetitive spaces supported by brick or <strong>ca</strong>st iron columns.<br />

Be<strong>ca</strong>use they were vulnerable to fire, most <strong>of</strong> the earliest mills have now been burnt down or<br />

altered almost beyond recognition. Most were simple, brick structures, and although largely<br />

functional, the use <strong>of</strong> classi<strong>ca</strong>l detailing such as pediments and clock towers be<strong>ca</strong>me common.<br />

Such buildings were generally lo<strong>ca</strong>ted on streams, and thus concentrated in areas where water<br />

power was available. In the 1780s a form <strong>of</strong> firepro<strong>of</strong> construction, involving <strong>ca</strong>st-iron beams<br />

and shallow brick jack arches, was developed. This was used at Stanley Mill in Gloucestershire, a<br />

‘fire pro<strong>of</strong> ’ woollen mill, where the use <strong>of</strong> Palladian windows and decorative <strong>ca</strong>st iron also illustrates<br />

the architectural pretension <strong>of</strong> the mill complex.<br />

Steam was applied to spinning in 1785, making possible factory buildings in towns, close to<br />

sources <strong>of</strong> labour and materials. <strong>The</strong> mill buildings <strong>of</strong> the <strong>An</strong>coats area in Manchester exemplify<br />

the way in which urban areas be<strong>ca</strong>me transformed by concentrations <strong>of</strong> multistorey textile<br />

complexes, although there is plentiful evidence to show that ‘out-working’ persisted as a mode <strong>of</strong><br />

operation (by the mid-nineteenth century only half the textile workers operated in factories). A<br />

survey <strong>of</strong> Yorkshire textile mills places rural water-powered mills in their lands<strong>ca</strong>pe context, and<br />

demonstrates the importance <strong>of</strong> looking at where and how mills were built as well as studying the<br />

buildings themselves (Giles and Goodall 1992).<br />

It is easy to forget that mills were usually only one element in a large industrial complex that<br />

might include single-storey weaving sheds, dye houses, engine houses, <strong>ca</strong>rding buildings, <strong>of</strong>fices<br />

and a multitude <strong>of</strong> other small structures needed for the factory’s operation. In Manchester, the<br />

huge textile warehouses represent the role <strong>of</strong> marketing and distribution in the industry. At<br />

Saltaire in Bradford, West Yorkshire, the mill be<strong>ca</strong>me part <strong>of</strong> a social experiment where the mill<br />

owner, Titus Salt, built rows <strong>of</strong> houses for employees, adding a church, hospital, baths and schools.<br />

Such structures are usually very vulnerable, and archaeology <strong>ca</strong>n play a role in ensuring that the<br />

more obvious structures are placed in their context.<br />

Building technology<br />

Textile mills are only one <strong>of</strong> a wide range <strong>of</strong> new building types that began to appear in the late<br />

eighteenth century as a result <strong>of</strong> industrialization. Some <strong>ca</strong>tegories were very specific and a direct<br />

reflection <strong>of</strong> the process they housed, such as iron furnaces or gas holders, whilst other buildings<br />

depended upon a vo<strong>ca</strong>bulary <strong>of</strong> features that were designed to provide light, shelter, access, firepro<strong>of</strong>ing<br />

and perhaps power for industrial processes. Building technology evolved rapidly as<br />

early building types were found to be unsuitable for industrial processes, and <strong>of</strong>ten burnt down<br />

or were shaken to bits. <strong>The</strong> <strong>introduction</strong> <strong>of</strong> iron to support buildings, fire-pro<strong>of</strong>ing, and new<br />

construction techniques involving the use <strong>of</strong> concrete and rolled steel, zig-zag north light ro<strong>of</strong>s<br />

to bring in more light, and the use <strong>of</strong> steel framing all created extraordinarily innovative buildings.<br />

It should not be assumed that all such buildings were purely functional and without pretension.<br />

<strong>The</strong> earliest eighteenth-century factories made use <strong>of</strong> the Palladian idiom in their deployment <strong>of</strong><br />

pediments and ornate ro<strong>of</strong>s, and the industrial buildings <strong>of</strong> the Victorian period—such as the<br />

Egyptian style Temple Mill—illustrate all <strong>of</strong> the major themes in the architecture <strong>of</strong> the period.<br />

Workers’ housing<br />

Industries depended upon people, and many historians have commented upon the population<br />

changes in <strong>Britain</strong> during the period <strong>of</strong> industrialization. <strong>The</strong> population grew, and the centres <strong>of</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!