03.05.2015 Views

The Archaeology of Britain: An introduction from ... - waughfamily.ca

The Archaeology of Britain: An introduction from ... - waughfamily.ca

The Archaeology of Britain: An introduction from ... - waughfamily.ca

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

British archaeology since 1945<br />

• 11 •<br />

framework through radio<strong>ca</strong>rbon dating, and new perspectives derived <strong>from</strong> archaeologi<strong>ca</strong>l<br />

approaches to, for example, social change might have permitted a radi<strong>ca</strong>l alternative framework<br />

to be devised, this <strong>ca</strong>n be left to others, on another oc<strong>ca</strong>sion. <strong>The</strong> primary purpose here is to<br />

present a guide to current archaeologi<strong>ca</strong>l interpretations <strong>of</strong> the sites in <strong>Britain</strong>’s lands<strong>ca</strong>pes, and<br />

the artefacts in its museums.<br />

Despite the breadth <strong>of</strong> coverage, each chapter has been deliberately restricted in its bibliography.<br />

Each has two levels <strong>of</strong> bibliography: a set <strong>of</strong> some five key titles that en<strong>ca</strong>psulate the evidence <strong>of</strong>,<br />

and approaches to, the period under consideration; and a further set <strong>of</strong> about 25 titles that allows<br />

for greater detail or specialization. <strong>The</strong> criteria set were that all citations should be to works likely<br />

to be readily accessible in university libraries. This, it is anticipated, should assist students to<br />

embark on their own research for essay writing and other practi<strong>ca</strong>l course requirements. It will<br />

also give more highly motivated students opportunities to begin to consider particular approaches<br />

or periods that are absent or less stressed in the particular a<strong>ca</strong>demic environments in which they<br />

are studying.<br />

In another context, John Updike wrote that ‘the fate <strong>of</strong> all monuments is to become…a<br />

riddle’. Whilst their interpretation undoubtedly poses challenges, the following chapters represent<br />

something <strong>of</strong> the range <strong>of</strong> archaeologi<strong>ca</strong>l approaches to the physi<strong>ca</strong>l fabric left by earlier societies<br />

that is now being attempted. Medieval monasteries, for example, once viewed primarily as building<br />

layouts and as repositories for the study <strong>of</strong> the development <strong>of</strong> architectural styles, are now<br />

frequently approached as constituent parts <strong>of</strong> economic lands<strong>ca</strong>pes and as arenas for evolving<br />

ritual practices. Similarly, <strong>ca</strong>stles, formerly considered essentially as fortifi<strong>ca</strong>tions and as keys to<br />

changing military tactics and equipment, may now be viewed as symbols <strong>of</strong> elite power and as<br />

central elements in organized economic hinterlands <strong>from</strong> which they drew resources. Comparable<br />

changes are evident for artefactual study, where some archaeologists are now much more readily<br />

prepared to hypothesize on social and ritual roles than was the <strong>ca</strong>se in the years immediately after<br />

the Second World War. Medieval artefacts, for example, viewed solely as fodder for art histori<strong>ca</strong>l<br />

studies, have in recent de<strong>ca</strong>des been increasingly studied as keys to technology, as products <strong>of</strong><br />

exchange and trade, and as indi<strong>ca</strong>tors <strong>of</strong> social relations and stratifi<strong>ca</strong>tion.<br />

As archaeologi<strong>ca</strong>l evidence accumulates, the very diverse characteristics <strong>of</strong> different places,<br />

sites and objects, conventionally described in the same way, are writ large. This is a book that<br />

en<strong>ca</strong>psulates archaeologi<strong>ca</strong>l change in many forms—a ‘snapshot’ <strong>of</strong> how we have been thinking,<br />

ex<strong>ca</strong>vating and learning in the late 1990s.<br />

Bibliography<br />

Ashmore, P.J., 1996. Neolithic and Bronze Age Scotland. London: Batsford/Historic Scotland.<br />

Atkinson, J.A., Banks, I. and O’Sullivan, J. (eds) 1996. Nationalism and archaeology. Glasgow: Cruithne<br />

Press.<br />

Barrett, J.C., 1995. Some challenges in contemporary archaeology. Oxford: Oxbow=Oxbow Lecture 2.<br />

Bell, M. and Walker, M.J.C., 1992. Late Quaternary environmental change: human and physi<strong>ca</strong>l perspectives. Harlow:<br />

Longman Scientific and Techni<strong>ca</strong>l.<br />

Bewley, R., 1994. English Heritage Book <strong>of</strong> prehistoric settlements. London: Batsford/English Heritage.<br />

Biddle, M., 1994. What future for British archaeology? Oxford: Oxbow=Oxbow Lecture 1.<br />

Bradley, R.J., 1984. <strong>The</strong> social foundations <strong>of</strong> prehistoric <strong>Britain</strong>: themes and variations in the archaeology <strong>of</strong> power.<br />

London: Longman.<br />

Brown, I., Burridge, D., Clarke, D., Guy, J., Hellis, J., Lowry, B., Ruckley, N. and Thomas, R., 1995. 20th<br />

century defences in <strong>Britain</strong>; an introductory guide. York: Council for British <strong>Archaeology</strong>=Practi<strong>ca</strong>l Handbooks<br />

in <strong>Archaeology</strong> 12.<br />

Champion, T.C., 1996. ‘Three nations or one? <strong>Britain</strong> and the national use <strong>of</strong> the past’, in Díaz-<strong>An</strong>dreu, M.<br />

and Champion, T.C. (eds) Nationalism and archaeology in Europe. London: UCL Press, 119–145.<br />

Clark, A., 1996. Seeing beneath the soil. London: Routledge.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!