The Archaeology of Britain: An introduction from ... - waughfamily.ca
The Archaeology of Britain: An introduction from ... - waughfamily.ca The Archaeology of Britain: An introduction from ... - waughfamily.ca
Middle Ages: towns • 225 • dark earth, the deposit normally associated with the Saxon centuries. Some towns, like Torksey in Lincolnshire, declined to almost nothing; now they are largely fields (Figure 12.8). Archaeological and historical work is beginning to suggest that the period from 1350 to 1500 can be divided further. At first, up to about 1420, urban populations reproduced themselves and made up for the plague losses. Towns went through a period of self-selection, where one might decline, but a local rival rose (Wallingford overtaken by Reading, Torksey overtaken by Boston). The larger centres such as York, Norwich and King’s Lynn went through a good period. After 1420, more general decay set in, and even the larger towns declined. By the early sixteenth century, to take an extreme case, it was reported that a quarter of all the houses in Coventry were empty. At the same time, there was a fundamental change in the trading patterns around the south of Britain. The fifteenth century opened in a phase of prosperity for foreign commerce, which had slumped to less than half of its former value by the middle of the century, and then rose to new heights. The area of trading swung away from Gascony and Normandy, and withdrew from the Baltic, to a more concentrated North Sea axis centred on the Netherlands. These changes are evident in the character of imported objects on British sites. It was the port towns, some of them growing new functions for the first time, that survived in good shape into the sixteenth century— not only London and Bristol, but Newcastle, Colchester, Ipswich, Exeter and Chester. We are at present only dimly aware of all the factors at play here, and regional archaeological studies will show which areas retained vitality or exploited new markets. Even greater changes, to the topography of towns and to the lifestyles of townspeople, were about to follow in the 1530s with the dissolution of the monasteries and the religious changes collectively known as the Reformation. THE BRITISH EVIDENCE IN ITS WIDER SETTING Although the rescue archaeology movement, in Britain and other European countries, has brought about the excavation and interpretation of sites of all periods from Palaeolithic to the modern, it has a special relevance for towns in Britain and for medieval archaeology. Urban archaeology as a discipline has grown up almost totally since 1945. Medieval archaeology as a subject has only a slightly longer history: in Britain, the first discussions of the concept date from about 1940. Rescue archaeology has also been active in medieval towns all over Europe (for examples of national reviews, see those for Germany and Sweden, in Fehring 1991 and Esgard et al. 1992). Though archaeologists in European countries, like their British counterparts, are now digesting the evidence of the last five decades, some common questions and answers are appearing. A critical question concerns whether archaeologists in medieval towns should try to apply theoretical models to their results, and whether these models should be derived from historical sources and deal with historical problems, or should be constructed totally by archaeologists themselves. Did medieval towns advance the economic development of Britain or Europe? Some scholars think that towns were irritants in the basically rural feudal system of life-control, and that towns were instrumental in the campaigns for individual rights (first for men, and later for women). Braudel (1979) distinguished between three sorts of town: the open town, which is still attached to its parent agricultural world; the subject town, which is shaped by an external political authority (a bishop, prince or king); and the closed town, where those within the town take over power for themselves. Western European economic growth is seen to be pushed forward by the attempts of some closed towns to increase and maintain their fortunes. This three-part grouping, which could be applied to British towns, underlines clearly that British towns are part of a larger European
• 226 • John Schofield phenomenon. Though small towns in England, Wales or Scotland were largely the built expressions of local interests, they were part of a larger European picture with many regional variations. This historical model (and there are several others) is, however, ultimately unsatisfactory. Towns refuse to be pinned down and categorized simply, and other scholars have argued that there is nothing special about towns, no independent city variable: towns are sites where more general structures of power and struggles for power are dramatically expressed. It is true that the town can be profitably discussed as a social form in which larger systems of social relations are concentrated and intensified. What is fascinating is to see how this intensification brings out specialized forms of housing, ways of coping with density of settlement and its problems, and the consequences of variety in occupations or ethnic groups. Some archaeologists (Carver 1987; Schofield and Vince 1994) have begun to construct a model that starts with the mountain of data now dug up from British towns. Let the data speak; see what it has to say. The extraordinary value of waterfront archaeology, the most important product of post-war excavations in European towns, has revolutionized the study of material medieval culture. It has shown how archaeology, aided by spectacular preservation of artefacts and the development of dendrochronology, has constructed a whole new area of study and debate with historians, and on its own terms. Acknowledgements I am grateful to my students Vicky Snelling, Tom Dodd and Graham Cushmay for criticism of this chapter in draft. KEY TEXTS Aston, M. and Bond, J., 1974. The landscape of towns. London: Dent. Clarke, H., 1984. The archaeology of medieval England. London: British Museum. Dyer, C., 1989. Standards of living in the later Middle Ages: social change in England c 1200–1520. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Platt, C., 1976. The English medieval town. London: Secker and Warburg. Schofield, J. and Vince, A., 1994. Medieval towns. London: Pinter Press. Steane, J.M., 1985. The archaeology of medieval England and Wales. Beckenham: Croom Helm. Bibliography Atkin, M., 1985. ‘Excavations on Alms Lane’, in Atkin, M., Carter, A. and Evans, D.H., Excavations in Norwich 1971–78, Part II. Gressenhall: East Anglian Archaeology 26, 144–260. Biddle, M. (ed.) 1990. Object and economy in medieval Winchester. Oxford: Winchester Studies 7.ii. Blair, J. and Ramsay, N. (eds) 1991. English medieval industries. London: Hambledon Press. Braudel, F., 1979. Capitalism and material life 1400–1800. London: Fontana. Carver, M.O.H., 1980. ‘Medieval Worcester: an archaeological framework’, Transactions of the Worcestershire Archaeological Society 7. Carver, M.O.H., 1987. ‘The nature of urban deposits’, in Schofield, J. and Leech, R. (eds) Urban archaeology in Britain. London: Council for British Archaeology Research Report 61, 9–26. Clarke, H.B. and Simms, A. (eds) 1985. The comparative history of urban origins in non-Roman Europe, Oxford: British Archaeological Reports 255. Crowfoot, E., Pritchard, F. and Staniland, K., 1992. Textiles and clothing c 1150-c 1450, =Medieval finds from excavations in London 4. London: HMSO. Daniels, R., 1990. ‘The development of medieval Hartlepool: excavations at Church Close, 1984–5’, Archaeological Journal 147, 337–410. Egan, G. and Pritchard, F., 1991. Dress accessories =Medieval finds from excavations in London 3. London: HMSO.
- Page 189 and 190: • 174 • Simon Esmonde Cleary th
- Page 191 and 192: Chapter Ten Early Historic Britain
- Page 193 and 194: • 178 • Catherine Hills retrosp
- Page 195 and 196: • 180 • Catherine Hills and the
- Page 197 and 198: • 182 • Catherine Hills Early m
- Page 199 and 200: • 184 • Catherine Hills but the
- Page 201 and 202: • 186 • Catherine Hills Attenti
- Page 203 and 204: • 188 • Catherine Hills are har
- Page 205 and 206: • 190 • Catherine Hills grave a
- Page 207 and 208: • 192 • Catherine Hills Figure
- Page 209 and 210: Chapter Eleven The Scandinavian pre
- Page 211 and 212: • 196 • Julian D.Richards There
- Page 213 and 214: • 198 • Julian D.Richards the A
- Page 215 and 216: • 200 • Julian D.Richards and a
- Page 217 and 218: • 202 • Julian D.Richards by an
- Page 219 and 220: • 204 • Julian D.Richards Figur
- Page 221 and 222: • 206 • Julian D.Richards avail
- Page 223 and 224: • 208 • Julian D.Richards stage
- Page 225 and 226: Chapter Twelve Landscapes of the Mi
- Page 227 and 228: • 212 • John Schofield Other to
- Page 229 and 230: • 214 • John Schofield A second
- Page 231 and 232: • 216 • John Schofield Suburbs
- Page 233 and 234: • 218 • John Schofield archaeol
- Page 235 and 236: • 220 • John Schofield continuo
- Page 237 and 238: • 222 • John Schofield environm
- Page 239: • 224 • John Schofield particul
- Page 243 and 244: Chapter Thirteen Landscapes of the
- Page 245 and 246: • 230 • Roberta Gilchrist until
- Page 247 and 248: • 232 • Roberta Gilchrist multi
- Page 249 and 250: • 234 • Roberta Gilchrist house
- Page 251 and 252: • 236 • Roberta Gilchrist Figur
- Page 253 and 254: • 238 • Roberta Gilchrist Welsh
- Page 255 and 256: • 240 • Roberta Gilchrist The a
- Page 257 and 258: • 242 • Roberta Gilchrist refer
- Page 259 and 260: • 244 • Roberta Gilchrist bowl,
- Page 261 and 262: • 246 • Roberta Gilchrist Aston
- Page 263 and 264: • 248 • Paul Stamper peasants.
- Page 265 and 266: • 250 • Paul Stamper The first
- Page 267 and 268: • 252 • Paul Stamper Astill 198
- Page 269 and 270: • 254 • Paul Stamper Figure 14.
- Page 271 and 272: • 256 • Paul Stamper carpenters
- Page 273 and 274: • 258 • Paul Stamper ‘open’
- Page 275 and 276: • 260 • Paul Stamper replanning
- Page 277 and 278: • 262 • Paul Stamper projects (
- Page 279 and 280: Chapter Fifteen The historical geog
- Page 281 and 282: • 266 • Ian Whyte villages—te
- Page 283 and 284: • 268 • Ian Whyte Figure 15.2 M
- Page 285 and 286: • 270 • Ian Whyte LANDSCAPE App
- Page 287 and 288: • 272 • Ian Whyte gardens had b
- Page 289 and 290: • 274 • Ian Whyte The need of i
• 226 • John Sch<strong>of</strong>ield<br />
phenomenon. Though small towns in England, Wales or Scotland were largely the built expressions<br />
<strong>of</strong> lo<strong>ca</strong>l interests, they were part <strong>of</strong> a larger European picture with many regional variations.<br />
This histori<strong>ca</strong>l model (and there are several others) is, however, ultimately unsatisfactory. Towns<br />
refuse to be pinned down and <strong>ca</strong>tegorized simply, and other scholars have argued that there is<br />
nothing special about towns, no independent city variable: towns are sites where more general<br />
structures <strong>of</strong> power and struggles for power are dramati<strong>ca</strong>lly expressed. It is true that the town<br />
<strong>ca</strong>n be pr<strong>of</strong>itably discussed as a social form in which larger systems <strong>of</strong> social relations are<br />
concentrated and intensified. What is fascinating is to see how this intensifi<strong>ca</strong>tion brings out<br />
specialized forms <strong>of</strong> housing, ways <strong>of</strong> coping with density <strong>of</strong> settlement and its problems, and<br />
the consequences <strong>of</strong> variety in occupations or ethnic groups.<br />
Some archaeologists (Carver 1987; Sch<strong>of</strong>ield and Vince 1994) have begun to construct a model<br />
that starts with the mountain <strong>of</strong> data now dug up <strong>from</strong> British towns. Let the data speak; see what<br />
it has to say. <strong>The</strong> extraordinary value <strong>of</strong> waterfront archaeology, the most important product <strong>of</strong><br />
post-war ex<strong>ca</strong>vations in European towns, has revolutionized the study <strong>of</strong> material medieval culture.<br />
It has shown how archaeology, aided by spectacular preservation <strong>of</strong> artefacts and the development<br />
<strong>of</strong> dendrochronology, has constructed a whole new area <strong>of</strong> study and debate with historians, and<br />
on its own terms.<br />
Acknowledgements<br />
I am grateful to my students Vicky Snelling, Tom Dodd and Graham Cushmay for criticism <strong>of</strong><br />
this chapter in draft.<br />
KEY TEXTS<br />
Aston, M. and Bond, J., 1974. <strong>The</strong> lands<strong>ca</strong>pe <strong>of</strong> towns. London: Dent.<br />
Clarke, H., 1984. <strong>The</strong> archaeology <strong>of</strong> medieval England. London: British Museum.<br />
Dyer, C., 1989. Standards <strong>of</strong> living in the later Middle Ages: social change in England c 1200–1520. Cambridge:<br />
Cambridge University Press.<br />
Platt, C., 1976. <strong>The</strong> English medieval town. London: Secker and Warburg.<br />
Sch<strong>of</strong>ield, J. and Vince, A., 1994. Medieval towns. London: Pinter Press.<br />
Steane, J.M., 1985. <strong>The</strong> archaeology <strong>of</strong> medieval England and Wales. Beckenham: Croom Helm.<br />
Bibliography<br />
Atkin, M., 1985. ‘Ex<strong>ca</strong>vations on Alms Lane’, in Atkin, M., Carter, A. and Evans, D.H., Ex<strong>ca</strong>vations in<br />
Norwich 1971–78, Part II. Gressenhall: East <strong>An</strong>glian <strong>Archaeology</strong> 26, 144–260.<br />
Biddle, M. (ed.) 1990. Object and economy in medieval Winchester. Oxford: Winchester Studies 7.ii.<br />
Blair, J. and Ramsay, N. (eds) 1991. English medieval industries. London: Hambledon Press.<br />
Braudel, F., 1979. Capitalism and material life 1400–1800. London: Fontana.<br />
Carver, M.O.H., 1980. ‘Medieval Worcester: an archaeologi<strong>ca</strong>l framework’, Transactions <strong>of</strong> the Worcestershire<br />
Archaeologi<strong>ca</strong>l Society 7.<br />
Carver, M.O.H., 1987. ‘<strong>The</strong> nature <strong>of</strong> urban deposits’, in Sch<strong>of</strong>ield, J. and Leech, R. (eds) Urban archaeology<br />
in <strong>Britain</strong>. London: Council for British <strong>Archaeology</strong> Research Report 61, 9–26.<br />
Clarke, H.B. and Simms, A. (eds) 1985. <strong>The</strong> comparative history <strong>of</strong> urban origins in non-Roman Europe, Oxford:<br />
British Archaeologi<strong>ca</strong>l Reports 255.<br />
Crowfoot, E., Pritchard, F. and Staniland, K., 1992. Textiles and clothing c 1150-c 1450, =Medieval finds <strong>from</strong><br />
ex<strong>ca</strong>vations in London 4. London: HMSO.<br />
Daniels, R., 1990. ‘<strong>The</strong> development <strong>of</strong> medieval Hartlepool: ex<strong>ca</strong>vations at Church Close, 1984–5’,<br />
Archaeologi<strong>ca</strong>l Journal 147, 337–410.<br />
Egan, G. and Pritchard, F., 1991. Dress accessories =Medieval finds <strong>from</strong> ex<strong>ca</strong>vations in London 3. London:<br />
HMSO.