The Archaeology of Britain: An introduction from ... - waughfamily.ca

The Archaeology of Britain: An introduction from ... - waughfamily.ca The Archaeology of Britain: An introduction from ... - waughfamily.ca

waughfamily.ca
from waughfamily.ca More from this publisher
03.05.2015 Views

Early historic Britain • 185 • Figure 10.4 Anglo-Saxon grave from Kent. Source: Canterbury Archaeological Trust coins, and probably for the burial, early in the seventh century. This would be too early for the most popular contender for occupancy of mound I, King Redwald of East Anglia, known to us from Bede as a lapsed Christian king who died in the 620s. Perhaps one of the other mounds did contain Redwald, but mound I is more likely to have been the grave of a predecessor. Another grave, excavated in 1991, contained a young man buried in a coffin with weapons, bronze and wooden vessels, and horse harness. In a grave beside him lay his horse. The status of others buried at Sutton Hoo was less exalted. A series of graves was found in the recent excavation campaign that contained the remains of Figure 10.5 Sutton Hoo from the air. Source: C.Hoppit individuals who seemed to have been executed. Some of these were contemporary with the rich burials, others probably belong to a later Saxon use of the site as a place of execution.

• 186 • Catherine Hills Attention has also been devoted to more subtle variations in status. Some graves contained sword, shield and spear, others spears only. Some had five brooches, others one or none. It is possible to use this variation to reconstruct pyramidal gradations of rank that compare well with those recorded in later law codes. However, some of the variation is regional or chronological, and some may be due to varying religious beliefs or the ancestral burial traditions of different families. Age and gender seem to structure some differences: the attribution of weapons to men and jewellery to women has been broadly confirmed by osteological sexing of the bones, and relatively few grave goods were buried with children. But not all men had weapons nor all women brooches, and each cemetery has practices different from its neighbour, displaying a wide variety of local preferences within a standard range, and making it very difficult to produce any but the most general patterns. Settlements In western Britain and Scotland, a number of fortified sites have been identified on historical or archaeological grounds as being of early medieval date (Figure 10.6), including Dinas Powys in Wales, Tintagel in Cornwall, and Dunadd and Dundurn in Scotland (e.g. Campbell and Lane 1993). These sites are most often on hill tops or steep promontories, or on crannogs. They have produced imported Mediterranean pottery and glass, decorated metalwork, and evidence for the manufacture of similar metalwork. The nature of the sites as fortified strongholds and the presence of high-status objects makes it clear that these are elite residences, although they have not produced elaborate structural remains. They cannot yet be put in the wider context of the network of contemporary lower status farms and villages that must have existed, because these are still proving difficult to distinguish from similar settlements of much earlier or later date. Figure 10.6 Aerial view of fort at Dundurn, Perthshire. Source: Ian Ralston

• 186 • Catherine Hills<br />

Attention has also been devoted to more subtle variations in status. Some graves contained<br />

sword, shield and spear, others spears only. Some had five brooches, others one or none. It is<br />

possible to use this variation to reconstruct pyramidal gradations <strong>of</strong> rank that compare well with<br />

those recorded in later law codes. However, some <strong>of</strong> the variation is regional or chronologi<strong>ca</strong>l,<br />

and some may be due to varying religious beliefs or the ancestral burial traditions <strong>of</strong> different<br />

families. Age and gender seem to structure some differences: the attribution <strong>of</strong> weapons to men<br />

and jewellery to women has been broadly confirmed by osteologi<strong>ca</strong>l sexing <strong>of</strong> the bones, and<br />

relatively few grave goods were buried with children. But not all men had weapons nor all women<br />

brooches, and each cemetery has practices different <strong>from</strong> its neighbour, displaying a wide variety<br />

<strong>of</strong> lo<strong>ca</strong>l preferences within a standard range, and making it very difficult to produce any but the<br />

most general patterns.<br />

Settlements<br />

In western <strong>Britain</strong> and Scotland, a number <strong>of</strong> fortified sites have been identified on histori<strong>ca</strong>l or<br />

archaeologi<strong>ca</strong>l grounds as being <strong>of</strong> early medieval date (Figure 10.6), including Dinas Powys in<br />

Wales, Tintagel in Cornwall, and Dunadd and Dundurn in Scotland (e.g. Campbell and Lane<br />

1993). <strong>The</strong>se sites are most <strong>of</strong>ten on hill tops or steep promontories, or on crannogs. <strong>The</strong>y have<br />

produced imported Mediterranean pottery and glass, decorated metalwork, and evidence for the<br />

manufacture <strong>of</strong> similar metalwork. <strong>The</strong> nature <strong>of</strong> the sites as fortified strongholds and the presence<br />

<strong>of</strong> high-status objects makes it clear that these are elite residences, although they have not produced<br />

elaborate structural remains. <strong>The</strong>y <strong>ca</strong>nnot yet be put in the wider context <strong>of</strong> the network <strong>of</strong><br />

contemporary lower status farms and villages that must have existed, be<strong>ca</strong>use these are still proving<br />

difficult to distinguish <strong>from</strong> similar settlements <strong>of</strong> much earlier or later date.<br />

Figure 10.6 Aerial view <strong>of</strong> fort at Dundurn, Perthshire.<br />

Source: Ian Ralston

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!