03.05.2015 Views

The Archaeology of Britain: An introduction from ... - waughfamily.ca

The Archaeology of Britain: An introduction from ... - waughfamily.ca

The Archaeology of Britain: An introduction from ... - waughfamily.ca

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

• 182 • Catherine Hills<br />

Early maps show field boundaries, some still in existence, that underlie, and were therefore<br />

earlier than, Roman roads, but which must have continued in use through <strong>An</strong>glo-Saxon, medieval<br />

and early modern centuries (Williamson 1993, Fig 2.1). If fields, plants and animals survived, so<br />

must some <strong>of</strong> the people.<br />

<strong>The</strong> question now is not whether any Britons remained to form part <strong>of</strong> the population <strong>of</strong><br />

‘<strong>An</strong>glo-Saxon’ England, but whether immigrants arrived in signifi<strong>ca</strong>nt numbers or just as small<br />

groups <strong>of</strong> invading warriors who took over at the top, but did not replace the basic population<br />

(Higham 1992). In the west, it was never thought that the Britons disappeared, but there were<br />

Irish settlers in the south-west, and also the Scoti in Dalriada, more <strong>of</strong>ten interpreted as invading<br />

war leaders than as a folk migration.<br />

Cemeteries<br />

Early medieval cemeteries have not been discovered in large numbers in western and northern<br />

<strong>Britain</strong> (Edwards and Lane 1992). Known burials in those regions are mostly unfurnished<br />

inhumations dated, <strong>of</strong>ten very approximately, by stratigraphy or radio<strong>ca</strong>rbon. <strong>The</strong>re is a variety<br />

<strong>of</strong> associated structures: round or square ditched enclosures, stone cists or <strong>ca</strong>irns, and some<br />

evidence for reuse <strong>of</strong> prehistoric burial monuments. In as much as the limited evidence allows<br />

for argument, it suggests long-term continuity <strong>of</strong> practice <strong>from</strong> prehistoric and Roman-period<br />

burial ritual, consistent with continuity <strong>of</strong> population, and the gradual <strong>introduction</strong> <strong>of</strong> features<br />

connected with Christianity, such as enclosed graveyards and churches.<br />

<strong>An</strong>glo-Saxon cemeteries (e.g. Scull 1992) are numerous, highly visible and apparently intrusive,<br />

be<strong>ca</strong>use they do not appear to be a development <strong>from</strong> past indigenous practice, but instead<br />

resemble burials found on the other side <strong>of</strong> the North Sea where they form part <strong>of</strong> a long lo<strong>ca</strong>l<br />

tradition <strong>of</strong> burial ritual. This has always seemed to be evidence for the immigration <strong>of</strong> large<br />

numbers <strong>of</strong> Germanic peoples across the North Sea to <strong>Britain</strong>. However, it is not clear what the<br />

native British burial practice was, since relatively few Iron Age or Roman burials have been<br />

ex<strong>ca</strong>vated in <strong>Britain</strong>, except for a few urban Roman cemeteries. <strong>The</strong> change may not have been so<br />

complete. Many <strong>An</strong>glo-Saxon cemeteries, especially in Yorkshire, are associated with prehistoric<br />

monuments such as Bronze Age barrows, and may represent newcomers laying claim to the<br />

ancestors <strong>of</strong> the lands they had taken over. <strong>The</strong> phenomenon might also represent a continuing<br />

veneration <strong>of</strong> monuments by people on lands that had always been occupied. All the same, there<br />

are such similarities between English and continental burials that there must have been a close<br />

connection between the respective peoples involved, and migration <strong>ca</strong>nnot be discounted as a<br />

partial explanation. This need not mean that all the occupants <strong>of</strong> ‘<strong>An</strong>glo-Saxon’ burials were <strong>of</strong><br />

Germanic ancestry. Britons might have adopted foreign customs through social or politi<strong>ca</strong>l<br />

expediency, or religious conversion.<br />

In the east, the majority <strong>of</strong> the earliest burials were cremations. One <strong>of</strong> the largest cremation<br />

cemeteries ex<strong>ca</strong>vated in England is Spong Hill, North Elmham, Norfolk (e.g. Hills 1976; McKinley<br />

1994), where more than 2,000 cremations and 56 inhumations were ex<strong>ca</strong>vated <strong>from</strong> a cemetery<br />

used in the fifth and sixth centuries AD (Figure 10.3). <strong>The</strong> bones were contained in hand-made<br />

pots, <strong>of</strong>ten elaborately decorated with incised, stamped or plastic decoration. It was possible to<br />

identify groups <strong>of</strong> pots decorated with the same tool, and therefore made at the same time,<br />

probably by the same person. Adults <strong>of</strong> both sexes and children had been buried there. Many <strong>of</strong><br />

the graves also contained cremated animal bones, some <strong>of</strong> which might have been food <strong>of</strong>ferings,<br />

but in many <strong>ca</strong>ses it seems that a whole animal, usually a horse, had been burnt on the pyre. <strong>The</strong>se<br />

were young adult animals which must have been valuable, so that their sacrifice was a signifi<strong>ca</strong>nt<br />

<strong>of</strong>fering <strong>of</strong> wealth. <strong>The</strong> women buried had been laid out wearing their jewellery, glass beads and<br />

bronze brooches, the melted remains <strong>of</strong> which were then put in the pot with the bones. Men were not

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!