The Archaeology of Britain: An introduction from ... - waughfamily.ca

The Archaeology of Britain: An introduction from ... - waughfamily.ca The Archaeology of Britain: An introduction from ... - waughfamily.ca

waughfamily.ca
from waughfamily.ca More from this publisher
03.05.2015 Views

Roman Britain: civil and rural society • 165 • Bignor (West Sussex) or Woodchester (Gloucestershire), which stand comparison with the great continental villas, though there were also some much more modest establishments of this date, such as Barnack (Cambridgeshire). In the first spate of the provision of mosaics at the end of the second century, they were almost all laid in the new mansions in the ‘large’ towns. The main phase of mosaic laying in Britain, however, was not until the first half of the fourth century, and now the majority of these were laid at villas, with some also at residences in the ‘large’ towns, reflecting the shift in display to the private sphere and the growing importance of rural seats visà-vis the main towns. Many of these mosaics showed divine figures or mythical scenes, all of which were taken from Graeco-Roman, not Celtic, culture and religion (including Christianity). Until recently, it was assumed that a villa was the residence of a land-owning male aristocrat, his family and dependants. This accorded with the picture derived from the Roman agrarian writers and also unconsciously reflected the pattern of the modern British land-owning aristocracy: the villa seen as protocountry-house. More recently, it has been argued that some villa plans are more amenable to dissection as a series of units of differing size and status, and thus rather than reflecting the picture outlined above, might in fact show multiple occupancy of a single villa, perhaps by different branches of a descent group in a ‘Celtic’ fashion (Smith 1978). Though this suggestion is not universally accepted, it does illustrate how unstated preconceptions can influence interpretation, and how new approaches can be applied to old evidence. Figure 9.5 Gorhambury, Hertfordshire. (A) The Late Iron Age settlement; (B) the Early Roman period settlement; (C) the second-century villa; (D) the villa in the third century. Source: Neal, D.S. et al., 1990. Excavation of the Iron Age, Roman and Medieval Settlement at Gorhambury, St Albans. London: English Heritage Archaeological Report 14.

• 166 • Simon Esmonde Cleary Other rural settlements One of the many benefits of aerial and other survey techniques has been to end dependence on villas for our view of the Romano-British countryside and its society. Instead of a number of isolated sites, archaeologists can now discern a landscape articulated into fieldsystems, and crossed by tracks and boundaries (Fulford 1990). It is now clear that the great majority of settlements were of the ‘native farmstead’ type, that is enclosed groups of structures, usually of the prehistoric roundhouse tradition and yielding relatively little Romanized artefactual material (Hingley 1989). Alongside these dispersed, small settlements, perhaps the homes of extended family groups, there are also nucleated linear settlements, somewhat reminiscent of medieval village plans. These are best known in Somerset (Catsgore), Wiltshire (Chisenbury Warren, Nook) and Hampshire (Chalton) (Figure 9.6). Many non-villa settlements continue on the same site from the Late Iron Age, but there is increasing evidence Figure 9.6 Settlement and landscape of the Roman period in the vicinity that through the 400 years of Roman of Chalton, Hampshire. Britain, there was much settlement Source: Cunliffe, B.W., 1976, ‘A Romano-British village at Chalton, Hants’, shift, boundary redrawing and the Proceedings of the Hampshire Field Club 33. creation of new field-systems, so that the agrarian landscape of the fourth century would often have been markedly different from that of the first. Large-scale modern excavations in advance of gravel-extraction in the river valleys of lowland Britain at sites in the upper Thames Valley such as Claydon Pike, Lechlade (Gloucestershire), the Warwickshire Avon at Beckford (Hereford and Worcestershire) and Wasperton (Warwickshire) have enabled detailed studies of the shifting pattern of settlements within their contemporary landscapes. It can seem at first sight that the majority of the rural population was little touched by the Roman way of doing things, though archaeologists should not slide too easily into thinking that there was no contact. Towns ‘large’ and ‘small’ would make available new products and new ideas. Links up the social hierarchy to Romanized landowners would also introduce new ways. Moreover, the ubiquitous demands of taxation, military supply and possibly military service would make these people aware of the imperial system. Though in their day-to-day lives there might be little direct evidence of Rome, the social, economic and mental frameworks within which those lives were conducted would have changed.

Roman <strong>Britain</strong>: civil and rural society<br />

• 165 •<br />

Bignor (West Sussex) or Woodchester<br />

(Gloucestershire), which stand<br />

comparison with the great<br />

continental villas, though there were<br />

also some much more modest<br />

establishments <strong>of</strong> this date, such as<br />

Barnack (Cambridgeshire).<br />

In the first spate <strong>of</strong> the provision<br />

<strong>of</strong> mosaics at the end <strong>of</strong> the second<br />

century, they were almost all laid in<br />

the new mansions in the ‘large’ towns.<br />

<strong>The</strong> main phase <strong>of</strong> mosaic laying in<br />

<strong>Britain</strong>, however, was not until the first<br />

half <strong>of</strong> the fourth century, and now<br />

the majority <strong>of</strong> these were laid at villas,<br />

with some also at residences in the<br />

‘large’ towns, reflecting the shift in<br />

display to the private sphere and the<br />

growing importance <strong>of</strong> rural seats visà-vis<br />

the main towns. Many <strong>of</strong> these<br />

mosaics showed divine figures or<br />

mythi<strong>ca</strong>l scenes, all <strong>of</strong> which were<br />

taken <strong>from</strong> Graeco-Roman, not Celtic,<br />

culture and religion (including<br />

Christianity). Until recently, it was<br />

assumed that a villa was the residence<br />

<strong>of</strong> a land-owning male aristocrat, his<br />

family and dependants. This accorded<br />

with the picture derived <strong>from</strong> the<br />

Roman agrarian writers and also<br />

unconsciously reflected the pattern <strong>of</strong><br />

the modern British land-owning<br />

aristocracy: the villa seen as protocountry-house.<br />

More recently, it has<br />

been argued that some villa plans are<br />

more amenable to dissection as a series<br />

<strong>of</strong> units <strong>of</strong> differing size and status,<br />

and thus rather than reflecting the<br />

picture outlined above, might in fact<br />

show multiple occupancy <strong>of</strong> a single<br />

villa, perhaps by different branches <strong>of</strong><br />

a descent group in a ‘Celtic’ fashion<br />

(Smith 1978). Though this suggestion<br />

is not universally accepted, it does<br />

illustrate how unstated preconceptions<br />

<strong>ca</strong>n influence interpretation, and how<br />

new approaches <strong>ca</strong>n be applied to old<br />

evidence.<br />

Figure 9.5 Gorhambury, Hertfordshire. (A) <strong>The</strong> Late Iron Age settlement;<br />

(B) the Early Roman period settlement; (C) the second-century villa; (D) the<br />

villa in the third century.<br />

Source: Neal, D.S. et al., 1990. Ex<strong>ca</strong>vation <strong>of</strong> the Iron Age, Roman and Medieval<br />

Settlement at Gorhambury, St Albans. London: English Heritage Archaeologi<strong>ca</strong>l<br />

Report 14.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!