The Archaeology of Britain: An introduction from ... - waughfamily.ca

The Archaeology of Britain: An introduction from ... - waughfamily.ca The Archaeology of Britain: An introduction from ... - waughfamily.ca

waughfamily.ca
from waughfamily.ca More from this publisher
03.05.2015 Views

Chapter Nine Roman Britain Civil and rural society Simon Esmonde Cleary INTRODUCTION One of the briefest of the epochs of Britain’s past, the Roman period is also one of the most recognizable. To the archaeologist, this is because it saw the introduction of important and distinctive new classes of site, monument and artefact. More generally, it is also the period that bequeathed legacies such as roads and towns that still shape the map of Britain. It also marks the intrusion into Britain of Classical culture, the intellectual, literary and architectural vocabulary of which are embedded in modern European idioms. It can therefore seem comfortingly familiar, perhaps dangerously so for those whose business it is to investigate the ‘otherness’ of the past. The distinctive dataset, links with the wider Classical world and some long-standing intellectual traditions mean that the study of Roman Britain has often been rather self-contained. At both the beginning and the end of the Roman period, however, an incoming group imposed itself on a numerically far superior indigenous population. The archaeological distinctiveness of Roman and of Anglo-Saxon material culture (Chapter 10) has meant that perhaps disproportionate effort has been expended on the minority at the expense of the less archaeologically obvious majority. One of the longest standing approaches to the analysis and explanation of the archaeology of the Roman period has been the concept of ‘Romanization’, analysing the nature and process of the interaction of Roman and indigenous culture to produce the synthesis known as ‘Romano- British’ (Millett 1990; see also Chapter 8 here). This was not a process whereby the imperial power imposed its culture, but one where the British population made choices about its relationship to that power and about how to display those choices through the adoption (or not) of Romanstyle behaviour and its physical expressions. This approach can be undertaken only with an understanding of the Later Iron Age (Chapter 7 here) in order to identify and assess the changes resulting from the Roman conquest. The links between the two periods and the transition from one to the other are visible in the archaeological record, and currently the increasing emphasis on the role of the indigenous population can lead to the earlier part of the Roman period at least being seen almost as a continuation of the Iron Age by other means. At the end of the Roman period, the interface between Roman Britain and Early Anglo-Saxon England is much less well studied and understood, for the two material cultures seem to have nothing in common, reinforcing the impression of ethnic, cultural and religious separateness gained from the written sources. More recent research and excavation are suggesting, however,

• 158 • Simon Esmonde Cleary that again the relationship between the incomers and the indigenous population may not have been as adversarial as literary convention likes to portray. Even so, the study of the beginning of the Roman period is dominated by models of continuity, and that of its end by models of discontinuity. FRAMEWORKS Sub-divisions of the period Though Roman Britain lasted for only some 400 years, its study has tended to fall into two parts: an earlier period running from the Claudian invasion of AD 43 down to the end of the second century, and a later comprising the third and fourth centuries through to the disappearance of Roman rule and material culture in the first half of the fifth century. Initially, this division and the concentration on the earlier period reflected a wider perspective of the Early Roman Empire (the Principate) as a period of military expansion and cultural vigour, with the later Empire as a period of military decline and cultural decadence. Nowadays, both the wider perspective and the more particular British expression of it are viewed somewhat differently. The earlier period sees the impact of Rome on the native populations and systems Figure 9.1 Map of Roman Britain showing distribution of long-term military sites compared with civilian towns. Villas, temples and burials show through military conquest and the same overall distribution as the towns. cultural adaptation. The later period Source: Jones and Mattingly 1990 traces the trajectory of Romano- British culture under the influence of internal factors and in response to wider changes in the Roman world during the period now known as Late Antiquity (c.AD 300–700). Geographical scope Until recently, the archaeological study of the civil population of Roman Britain was largely concerned with the area south and east of a line from the Humber to the Devon Exe (cf. Jones

Chapter Nine<br />

Roman <strong>Britain</strong><br />

Civil and rural society<br />

Simon Esmonde Cleary<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

One <strong>of</strong> the briefest <strong>of</strong> the epochs <strong>of</strong> <strong>Britain</strong>’s past, the Roman period is also one <strong>of</strong> the most<br />

recognizable. To the archaeologist, this is be<strong>ca</strong>use it saw the <strong>introduction</strong> <strong>of</strong> important and<br />

distinctive new classes <strong>of</strong> site, monument and artefact. More generally, it is also the period that<br />

bequeathed legacies such as roads and towns that still shape the map <strong>of</strong> <strong>Britain</strong>. It also marks the<br />

intrusion into <strong>Britain</strong> <strong>of</strong> Classi<strong>ca</strong>l culture, the intellectual, literary and architectural vo<strong>ca</strong>bulary <strong>of</strong><br />

which are embedded in modern European idioms. It <strong>ca</strong>n therefore seem comfortingly familiar,<br />

perhaps dangerously so for those whose business it is to investigate the ‘otherness’ <strong>of</strong> the past.<br />

<strong>The</strong> distinctive dataset, links with the wider Classi<strong>ca</strong>l world and some long-standing intellectual<br />

traditions mean that the study <strong>of</strong> Roman <strong>Britain</strong> has <strong>of</strong>ten been rather self-contained. At both<br />

the beginning and the end <strong>of</strong> the Roman period, however, an incoming group imposed itself on<br />

a numeri<strong>ca</strong>lly far superior indigenous population. <strong>The</strong> archaeologi<strong>ca</strong>l distinctiveness <strong>of</strong> Roman<br />

and <strong>of</strong> <strong>An</strong>glo-Saxon material culture (Chapter 10) has meant that perhaps disproportionate effort<br />

has been expended on the minority at the expense <strong>of</strong> the less archaeologi<strong>ca</strong>lly obvious majority.<br />

One <strong>of</strong> the longest standing approaches to the analysis and explanation <strong>of</strong> the archaeology <strong>of</strong><br />

the Roman period has been the concept <strong>of</strong> ‘Romanization’, analysing the nature and process <strong>of</strong><br />

the interaction <strong>of</strong> Roman and indigenous culture to produce the synthesis known as ‘Romano-<br />

British’ (Millett 1990; see also Chapter 8 here). This was not a process whereby the imperial<br />

power imposed its culture, but one where the British population made choices about its relationship<br />

to that power and about how to display those choices through the adoption (or not) <strong>of</strong> Romanstyle<br />

behaviour and its physi<strong>ca</strong>l expressions. This approach <strong>ca</strong>n be undertaken only with an<br />

understanding <strong>of</strong> the Later Iron Age (Chapter 7 here) in order to identify and assess the changes<br />

resulting <strong>from</strong> the Roman conquest. <strong>The</strong> links between the two periods and the transition <strong>from</strong><br />

one to the other are visible in the archaeologi<strong>ca</strong>l record, and currently the increasing emphasis on<br />

the role <strong>of</strong> the indigenous population <strong>ca</strong>n lead to the earlier part <strong>of</strong> the Roman period at least<br />

being seen almost as a continuation <strong>of</strong> the Iron Age by other means.<br />

At the end <strong>of</strong> the Roman period, the interface between Roman <strong>Britain</strong> and Early <strong>An</strong>glo-Saxon<br />

England is much less well studied and understood, for the two material cultures seem to have<br />

nothing in common, reinforcing the impression <strong>of</strong> ethnic, cultural and religious separateness<br />

gained <strong>from</strong> the written sources. More recent research and ex<strong>ca</strong>vation are suggesting, however,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!