The Archaeology of Britain: An introduction from ... - waughfamily.ca
The Archaeology of Britain: An introduction from ... - waughfamily.ca The Archaeology of Britain: An introduction from ... - waughfamily.ca
Chapter Nine Roman Britain Civil and rural society Simon Esmonde Cleary INTRODUCTION One of the briefest of the epochs of Britain’s past, the Roman period is also one of the most recognizable. To the archaeologist, this is because it saw the introduction of important and distinctive new classes of site, monument and artefact. More generally, it is also the period that bequeathed legacies such as roads and towns that still shape the map of Britain. It also marks the intrusion into Britain of Classical culture, the intellectual, literary and architectural vocabulary of which are embedded in modern European idioms. It can therefore seem comfortingly familiar, perhaps dangerously so for those whose business it is to investigate the ‘otherness’ of the past. The distinctive dataset, links with the wider Classical world and some long-standing intellectual traditions mean that the study of Roman Britain has often been rather self-contained. At both the beginning and the end of the Roman period, however, an incoming group imposed itself on a numerically far superior indigenous population. The archaeological distinctiveness of Roman and of Anglo-Saxon material culture (Chapter 10) has meant that perhaps disproportionate effort has been expended on the minority at the expense of the less archaeologically obvious majority. One of the longest standing approaches to the analysis and explanation of the archaeology of the Roman period has been the concept of ‘Romanization’, analysing the nature and process of the interaction of Roman and indigenous culture to produce the synthesis known as ‘Romano- British’ (Millett 1990; see also Chapter 8 here). This was not a process whereby the imperial power imposed its culture, but one where the British population made choices about its relationship to that power and about how to display those choices through the adoption (or not) of Romanstyle behaviour and its physical expressions. This approach can be undertaken only with an understanding of the Later Iron Age (Chapter 7 here) in order to identify and assess the changes resulting from the Roman conquest. The links between the two periods and the transition from one to the other are visible in the archaeological record, and currently the increasing emphasis on the role of the indigenous population can lead to the earlier part of the Roman period at least being seen almost as a continuation of the Iron Age by other means. At the end of the Roman period, the interface between Roman Britain and Early Anglo-Saxon England is much less well studied and understood, for the two material cultures seem to have nothing in common, reinforcing the impression of ethnic, cultural and religious separateness gained from the written sources. More recent research and excavation are suggesting, however,
• 158 • Simon Esmonde Cleary that again the relationship between the incomers and the indigenous population may not have been as adversarial as literary convention likes to portray. Even so, the study of the beginning of the Roman period is dominated by models of continuity, and that of its end by models of discontinuity. FRAMEWORKS Sub-divisions of the period Though Roman Britain lasted for only some 400 years, its study has tended to fall into two parts: an earlier period running from the Claudian invasion of AD 43 down to the end of the second century, and a later comprising the third and fourth centuries through to the disappearance of Roman rule and material culture in the first half of the fifth century. Initially, this division and the concentration on the earlier period reflected a wider perspective of the Early Roman Empire (the Principate) as a period of military expansion and cultural vigour, with the later Empire as a period of military decline and cultural decadence. Nowadays, both the wider perspective and the more particular British expression of it are viewed somewhat differently. The earlier period sees the impact of Rome on the native populations and systems Figure 9.1 Map of Roman Britain showing distribution of long-term military sites compared with civilian towns. Villas, temples and burials show through military conquest and the same overall distribution as the towns. cultural adaptation. The later period Source: Jones and Mattingly 1990 traces the trajectory of Romano- British culture under the influence of internal factors and in response to wider changes in the Roman world during the period now known as Late Antiquity (c.AD 300–700). Geographical scope Until recently, the archaeological study of the civil population of Roman Britain was largely concerned with the area south and east of a line from the Humber to the Devon Exe (cf. Jones
- Page 121 and 122: • 106 • Timothy Champion solely
- Page 123 and 124: • 108 • Timothy Champion and re
- Page 125 and 126: • 110 • Timothy Champion range
- Page 127 and 128: • 112 • Timothy Champion Coles,
- Page 129 and 130: • 114 • Colin Haselgrove votive
- Page 131 and 132: • 116 • Colin Haselgrove Figure
- Page 133 and 134: • 118 • Colin Haselgrove Figure
- Page 135 and 136: • 120 • Colin Haselgrove ancill
- Page 137 and 138: • 122 • Colin Haselgrove East A
- Page 139 and 140: • 124 • Colin Haselgrove France
- Page 141 and 142: • 126 • Colin Haselgrove As in
- Page 143 and 144: • 128 • Colin Haselgrove distri
- Page 145 and 146: • 130 • Colin Haselgrove From 1
- Page 147 and 148: • 132 • Colin Haselgrove throug
- Page 149 and 150: • 134 • Colin Haselgrove Stead,
- Page 151 and 152: • 136 • W.S.Hanson Table 8.1 Ev
- Page 153 and 154: • 138 • W.S.Hanson country are
- Page 155 and 156: • 140 • W.S.Hanson eventually s
- Page 157 and 158: • 142 • W.S.Hanson Figure 8.4 S
- Page 159 and 160: • 144 • W.S.Hanson Figure 8.5 S
- Page 161 and 162: • 146 • W.S.Hanson Westerton, P
- Page 163 and 164: • 148 • W.S.Hanson Figure 8.8 A
- Page 165 and 166: • 150 • W.S.Hanson around 1900,
- Page 167 and 168: • 152 • W.S.Hanson provision of
- Page 169 and 170: • 154 • W.S.Hanson Figure 8.11
- Page 171: • 156 • W.S.Hanson Bibliography
- Page 175 and 176: • 160 • Simon Esmonde Cleary pe
- Page 177 and 178: • 162 • Simon Esmonde Cleary Fi
- Page 179 and 180: • 164 • Simon Esmonde Cleary li
- Page 181 and 182: • 166 • Simon Esmonde Cleary Ot
- Page 183 and 184: • 168 • Simon Esmonde Cleary si
- Page 185 and 186: • 170 • Simon Esmonde Cleary ra
- Page 187 and 188: • 172 • Simon Esmonde Cleary si
- Page 189 and 190: • 174 • Simon Esmonde Cleary th
- Page 191 and 192: Chapter Ten Early Historic Britain
- Page 193 and 194: • 178 • Catherine Hills retrosp
- Page 195 and 196: • 180 • Catherine Hills and the
- Page 197 and 198: • 182 • Catherine Hills Early m
- Page 199 and 200: • 184 • Catherine Hills but the
- Page 201 and 202: • 186 • Catherine Hills Attenti
- Page 203 and 204: • 188 • Catherine Hills are har
- Page 205 and 206: • 190 • Catherine Hills grave a
- Page 207 and 208: • 192 • Catherine Hills Figure
- Page 209 and 210: Chapter Eleven The Scandinavian pre
- Page 211 and 212: • 196 • Julian D.Richards There
- Page 213 and 214: • 198 • Julian D.Richards the A
- Page 215 and 216: • 200 • Julian D.Richards and a
- Page 217 and 218: • 202 • Julian D.Richards by an
- Page 219 and 220: • 204 • Julian D.Richards Figur
- Page 221 and 222: • 206 • Julian D.Richards avail
Chapter Nine<br />
Roman <strong>Britain</strong><br />
Civil and rural society<br />
Simon Esmonde Cleary<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
One <strong>of</strong> the briefest <strong>of</strong> the epochs <strong>of</strong> <strong>Britain</strong>’s past, the Roman period is also one <strong>of</strong> the most<br />
recognizable. To the archaeologist, this is be<strong>ca</strong>use it saw the <strong>introduction</strong> <strong>of</strong> important and<br />
distinctive new classes <strong>of</strong> site, monument and artefact. More generally, it is also the period that<br />
bequeathed legacies such as roads and towns that still shape the map <strong>of</strong> <strong>Britain</strong>. It also marks the<br />
intrusion into <strong>Britain</strong> <strong>of</strong> Classi<strong>ca</strong>l culture, the intellectual, literary and architectural vo<strong>ca</strong>bulary <strong>of</strong><br />
which are embedded in modern European idioms. It <strong>ca</strong>n therefore seem comfortingly familiar,<br />
perhaps dangerously so for those whose business it is to investigate the ‘otherness’ <strong>of</strong> the past.<br />
<strong>The</strong> distinctive dataset, links with the wider Classi<strong>ca</strong>l world and some long-standing intellectual<br />
traditions mean that the study <strong>of</strong> Roman <strong>Britain</strong> has <strong>of</strong>ten been rather self-contained. At both<br />
the beginning and the end <strong>of</strong> the Roman period, however, an incoming group imposed itself on<br />
a numeri<strong>ca</strong>lly far superior indigenous population. <strong>The</strong> archaeologi<strong>ca</strong>l distinctiveness <strong>of</strong> Roman<br />
and <strong>of</strong> <strong>An</strong>glo-Saxon material culture (Chapter 10) has meant that perhaps disproportionate effort<br />
has been expended on the minority at the expense <strong>of</strong> the less archaeologi<strong>ca</strong>lly obvious majority.<br />
One <strong>of</strong> the longest standing approaches to the analysis and explanation <strong>of</strong> the archaeology <strong>of</strong><br />
the Roman period has been the concept <strong>of</strong> ‘Romanization’, analysing the nature and process <strong>of</strong><br />
the interaction <strong>of</strong> Roman and indigenous culture to produce the synthesis known as ‘Romano-<br />
British’ (Millett 1990; see also Chapter 8 here). This was not a process whereby the imperial<br />
power imposed its culture, but one where the British population made choices about its relationship<br />
to that power and about how to display those choices through the adoption (or not) <strong>of</strong> Romanstyle<br />
behaviour and its physi<strong>ca</strong>l expressions. This approach <strong>ca</strong>n be undertaken only with an<br />
understanding <strong>of</strong> the Later Iron Age (Chapter 7 here) in order to identify and assess the changes<br />
resulting <strong>from</strong> the Roman conquest. <strong>The</strong> links between the two periods and the transition <strong>from</strong><br />
one to the other are visible in the archaeologi<strong>ca</strong>l record, and currently the increasing emphasis on<br />
the role <strong>of</strong> the indigenous population <strong>ca</strong>n lead to the earlier part <strong>of</strong> the Roman period at least<br />
being seen almost as a continuation <strong>of</strong> the Iron Age by other means.<br />
At the end <strong>of</strong> the Roman period, the interface between Roman <strong>Britain</strong> and Early <strong>An</strong>glo-Saxon<br />
England is much less well studied and understood, for the two material cultures seem to have<br />
nothing in common, reinforcing the impression <strong>of</strong> ethnic, cultural and religious separateness<br />
gained <strong>from</strong> the written sources. More recent research and ex<strong>ca</strong>vation are suggesting, however,