The Archaeology of Britain: An introduction from ... - waughfamily.ca

The Archaeology of Britain: An introduction from ... - waughfamily.ca The Archaeology of Britain: An introduction from ... - waughfamily.ca

waughfamily.ca
from waughfamily.ca More from this publisher
03.05.2015 Views

Roman Britain: military dimension • 143 • KEY DATA Inchtuthil, Perthshire It is ironic that the most extensively known legionary fortress in Britain is that at Inchtuthil, which is both the most northerly and briefest occupied of all of the fortresses. A combination of aerial photography and limited excavation has recovered virtually the complete plan of the timberbuilt fortress (Figure 8.4a) (Pitts and St Joseph 1985). It covered an area of some 20 ha and was clearly intended to house a full legion. All of the barrack blocks had been built, along with the headquarters building, hospital, workshop, some of the granaries, and the houses for most of the junior officers. However, construction of the commanding officer’s house had not commenced when the fortress was abandoned and dismantled as part of the Roman withdrawal from northern Scotland, probably in AD 87. The location of the fortress on the extreme northern frontier represents the consolidation of the conquests achieved by Agricola, but placing a legion in this exposed position also indicates the Roman intention to continue to advance. Red House, Corbridge, Northumberland The full size of the fort at Red House is unknown, but its east-west dimension suggests that it should be interpreted as a vexillation fortress of some 10 ha. Excavation ahead of road building recovered traces of timber buildings, including a workshop, a large barrack block and several openended storage buildings (Hanson et al. 1979), while earlier work had identified the remains of a large bath building close by (Figure 8.4b). Occupation of the site was short-lived and seems to have been linked to the campaigns of Agricola, after which it was replaced by an auxiliary fort nearby. Elginhaugh, Midlothian This timber-built auxiliary fort is the only example for which we have the complete plan recovered by excavation. Eleven barrack blocks, two of them probably for cavalry, are crammed into a space of only 1.2 ha, providing accommodation for some 780 men (Figure 8.5a). More limited examination of the annexe to the west indicated a complex development of ovens and storage buildings alongside the road, with perhaps open spaces for the tethering of horses elsewhere in its interior. Situated at the northern end of Dere Street, the main route into Scotland up the eastern side of the country, the fort was occupied as part of the consolidation of Lowland Scotland from probably c.AD 80 and, like Inchtuthil, it was demolished and abandoned in AD 87. Immediately thereafter, however, the fort enclosure seems to have been reused by the Romans as a collection point for livestock, perhaps linked to the continuing extraction of tribute from the local tribe, the Votadini (Hanson forthcoming). Housesteads, Northumberland The auxiliary fort at Housesteads is perhaps one of the most famous in Roman Britain. It was attached to the rear of Hadrian’s Wall when garrisons were moved up to the line of the Wall as part of the reassessment of its operation during the course of its construction. The fort covered an area of 2 ha and probably contained some 800–1,000 men. The original plan is not known in its entirety, and the apparently ‘full’ plan as often published is a composite of different periods derived from excavations at the end of last century. The fort was occupied almost continuously from the reign of Hadrian in the second century AD through to the end of the fourth century, or the beginning of the fifth. Its garrison in the third and fourth centuries, the first cohort of Tungrians, an infantry unit originally from modern-day Belgium, is attested epigraphically. By the third century, an extensive civilian settlement had grown up around the fort, with some of the buildings encroaching

• 144 • W.S.Hanson Figure 8.5 Site plans: forts: a. Elginhaugh; b. Housesteads; c. Vindolanda; d. Richborough. right up to its walls (Crow 1995). The stone walls of the fort, with associated gates and towers, as well as the headquarters building, commanding officer’s house, granaries, hospital, latrine and some barrack blocks within it, have been consolidated and put on public display (see Figure 8.5b), along with some of the buildings of the civil settlement (‘vicus’) outside the south gate. Vindolanda (Chesterholm), Northumberland The Roman fort at Vindolanda, situated only some 3 km south of Housesteads, has a complex history. It was founded in the Late Flavian period (later first century AD), presumably as part of the military consolidation in northern England, but some years after its initial conquest. In the second century AD, the fort continued in use as one of the garrison posts along the Trajanic Stanegate frontier, and, like Corbridge, occupation appears to have continued even with the construction of Hadrian’s Wall and the moving of garrisons up to its line. The original timberbuilt fort was replaced in stone on a slightly different alignment probably in the later second century, and continued to be occupied through until the late fourth or early fifth (Figure 8.5c). The rampart walls and headquarters building of this stone fort have also been consolidated for public display, along with the external bath house and buildings of a civil settlement. The major importance of this site, however, derives from the excavation of the deeply buried earlier timber fort: its waterlogged state has preserved an exciting range of environmental evidence and organic artefacts, including writing tablets. These include elements of the fort’s administrative archive and copies of private letters (Bowman 1994).

• 144 • W.S.Hanson<br />

Figure 8.5 Site plans: forts: a. Elginhaugh; b. Housesteads; c. Vindolanda; d. Richborough.<br />

right up to its walls (Crow 1995). <strong>The</strong> stone walls <strong>of</strong> the fort, with associated gates and towers, as<br />

well as the headquarters building, commanding <strong>of</strong>ficer’s house, granaries, hospital, latrine and<br />

some barrack blocks within it, have been consolidated and put on public display (see Figure<br />

8.5b), along with some <strong>of</strong> the buildings <strong>of</strong> the civil settlement (‘vicus’) outside the south gate.<br />

Vindolanda (Chesterholm), Northumberland<br />

<strong>The</strong> Roman fort at Vindolanda, situated only some 3 km south <strong>of</strong> Housesteads, has a complex<br />

history. It was founded in the Late Flavian period (later first century AD), presumably as part <strong>of</strong><br />

the military consolidation in northern England, but some years after its initial conquest. In the<br />

second century AD, the fort continued in use as one <strong>of</strong> the garrison posts along the Trajanic<br />

Stanegate frontier, and, like Corbridge, occupation appears to have continued even with the<br />

construction <strong>of</strong> Hadrian’s Wall and the moving <strong>of</strong> garrisons up to its line. <strong>The</strong> original timberbuilt<br />

fort was replaced in stone on a slightly different alignment probably in the later second<br />

century, and continued to be occupied through until the late fourth or early fifth (Figure 8.5c).<br />

<strong>The</strong> rampart walls and headquarters building <strong>of</strong> this stone fort have also been consolidated for<br />

public display, along with the external bath house and buildings <strong>of</strong> a civil settlement. <strong>The</strong> major<br />

importance <strong>of</strong> this site, however, derives <strong>from</strong> the ex<strong>ca</strong>vation <strong>of</strong> the deeply buried earlier timber<br />

fort: its waterlogged state has preserved an exciting range <strong>of</strong> environmental evidence and organic<br />

artefacts, including writing tablets. <strong>The</strong>se include elements <strong>of</strong> the fort’s administrative archive<br />

and copies <strong>of</strong> private letters (Bowman 1994).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!