The Archaeology of Britain: An introduction from ... - waughfamily.ca
The Archaeology of Britain: An introduction from ... - waughfamily.ca The Archaeology of Britain: An introduction from ... - waughfamily.ca
Roman Britain: military dimension • 143 • KEY DATA Inchtuthil, Perthshire It is ironic that the most extensively known legionary fortress in Britain is that at Inchtuthil, which is both the most northerly and briefest occupied of all of the fortresses. A combination of aerial photography and limited excavation has recovered virtually the complete plan of the timberbuilt fortress (Figure 8.4a) (Pitts and St Joseph 1985). It covered an area of some 20 ha and was clearly intended to house a full legion. All of the barrack blocks had been built, along with the headquarters building, hospital, workshop, some of the granaries, and the houses for most of the junior officers. However, construction of the commanding officer’s house had not commenced when the fortress was abandoned and dismantled as part of the Roman withdrawal from northern Scotland, probably in AD 87. The location of the fortress on the extreme northern frontier represents the consolidation of the conquests achieved by Agricola, but placing a legion in this exposed position also indicates the Roman intention to continue to advance. Red House, Corbridge, Northumberland The full size of the fort at Red House is unknown, but its east-west dimension suggests that it should be interpreted as a vexillation fortress of some 10 ha. Excavation ahead of road building recovered traces of timber buildings, including a workshop, a large barrack block and several openended storage buildings (Hanson et al. 1979), while earlier work had identified the remains of a large bath building close by (Figure 8.4b). Occupation of the site was short-lived and seems to have been linked to the campaigns of Agricola, after which it was replaced by an auxiliary fort nearby. Elginhaugh, Midlothian This timber-built auxiliary fort is the only example for which we have the complete plan recovered by excavation. Eleven barrack blocks, two of them probably for cavalry, are crammed into a space of only 1.2 ha, providing accommodation for some 780 men (Figure 8.5a). More limited examination of the annexe to the west indicated a complex development of ovens and storage buildings alongside the road, with perhaps open spaces for the tethering of horses elsewhere in its interior. Situated at the northern end of Dere Street, the main route into Scotland up the eastern side of the country, the fort was occupied as part of the consolidation of Lowland Scotland from probably c.AD 80 and, like Inchtuthil, it was demolished and abandoned in AD 87. Immediately thereafter, however, the fort enclosure seems to have been reused by the Romans as a collection point for livestock, perhaps linked to the continuing extraction of tribute from the local tribe, the Votadini (Hanson forthcoming). Housesteads, Northumberland The auxiliary fort at Housesteads is perhaps one of the most famous in Roman Britain. It was attached to the rear of Hadrian’s Wall when garrisons were moved up to the line of the Wall as part of the reassessment of its operation during the course of its construction. The fort covered an area of 2 ha and probably contained some 800–1,000 men. The original plan is not known in its entirety, and the apparently ‘full’ plan as often published is a composite of different periods derived from excavations at the end of last century. The fort was occupied almost continuously from the reign of Hadrian in the second century AD through to the end of the fourth century, or the beginning of the fifth. Its garrison in the third and fourth centuries, the first cohort of Tungrians, an infantry unit originally from modern-day Belgium, is attested epigraphically. By the third century, an extensive civilian settlement had grown up around the fort, with some of the buildings encroaching
• 144 • W.S.Hanson Figure 8.5 Site plans: forts: a. Elginhaugh; b. Housesteads; c. Vindolanda; d. Richborough. right up to its walls (Crow 1995). The stone walls of the fort, with associated gates and towers, as well as the headquarters building, commanding officer’s house, granaries, hospital, latrine and some barrack blocks within it, have been consolidated and put on public display (see Figure 8.5b), along with some of the buildings of the civil settlement (‘vicus’) outside the south gate. Vindolanda (Chesterholm), Northumberland The Roman fort at Vindolanda, situated only some 3 km south of Housesteads, has a complex history. It was founded in the Late Flavian period (later first century AD), presumably as part of the military consolidation in northern England, but some years after its initial conquest. In the second century AD, the fort continued in use as one of the garrison posts along the Trajanic Stanegate frontier, and, like Corbridge, occupation appears to have continued even with the construction of Hadrian’s Wall and the moving of garrisons up to its line. The original timberbuilt fort was replaced in stone on a slightly different alignment probably in the later second century, and continued to be occupied through until the late fourth or early fifth (Figure 8.5c). The rampart walls and headquarters building of this stone fort have also been consolidated for public display, along with the external bath house and buildings of a civil settlement. The major importance of this site, however, derives from the excavation of the deeply buried earlier timber fort: its waterlogged state has preserved an exciting range of environmental evidence and organic artefacts, including writing tablets. These include elements of the fort’s administrative archive and copies of private letters (Bowman 1994).
- Page 107 and 108: • 92 • Mike Parker Pearson Bron
- Page 109 and 110: • 94 • Mike Parker Pearson Elli
- Page 111 and 112: • 96 • Timothy Champion For the
- Page 113 and 114: • 98 • Timothy Champion Perhaps
- Page 115 and 116: • 100 • Timothy Champion Figure
- Page 117 and 118: • 102 • Timothy Champion Little
- Page 119 and 120: • 104 • Timothy Champion CRAFT,
- Page 121 and 122: • 106 • Timothy Champion solely
- Page 123 and 124: • 108 • Timothy Champion and re
- Page 125 and 126: • 110 • Timothy Champion range
- Page 127 and 128: • 112 • Timothy Champion Coles,
- Page 129 and 130: • 114 • Colin Haselgrove votive
- Page 131 and 132: • 116 • Colin Haselgrove Figure
- Page 133 and 134: • 118 • Colin Haselgrove Figure
- Page 135 and 136: • 120 • Colin Haselgrove ancill
- Page 137 and 138: • 122 • Colin Haselgrove East A
- Page 139 and 140: • 124 • Colin Haselgrove France
- Page 141 and 142: • 126 • Colin Haselgrove As in
- Page 143 and 144: • 128 • Colin Haselgrove distri
- Page 145 and 146: • 130 • Colin Haselgrove From 1
- Page 147 and 148: • 132 • Colin Haselgrove throug
- Page 149 and 150: • 134 • Colin Haselgrove Stead,
- Page 151 and 152: • 136 • W.S.Hanson Table 8.1 Ev
- Page 153 and 154: • 138 • W.S.Hanson country are
- Page 155 and 156: • 140 • W.S.Hanson eventually s
- Page 157: • 142 • W.S.Hanson Figure 8.4 S
- Page 161 and 162: • 146 • W.S.Hanson Westerton, P
- Page 163 and 164: • 148 • W.S.Hanson Figure 8.8 A
- Page 165 and 166: • 150 • W.S.Hanson around 1900,
- Page 167 and 168: • 152 • W.S.Hanson provision of
- Page 169 and 170: • 154 • W.S.Hanson Figure 8.11
- Page 171 and 172: • 156 • W.S.Hanson Bibliography
- Page 173 and 174: • 158 • Simon Esmonde Cleary th
- Page 175 and 176: • 160 • Simon Esmonde Cleary pe
- Page 177 and 178: • 162 • Simon Esmonde Cleary Fi
- Page 179 and 180: • 164 • Simon Esmonde Cleary li
- Page 181 and 182: • 166 • Simon Esmonde Cleary Ot
- Page 183 and 184: • 168 • Simon Esmonde Cleary si
- Page 185 and 186: • 170 • Simon Esmonde Cleary ra
- Page 187 and 188: • 172 • Simon Esmonde Cleary si
- Page 189 and 190: • 174 • Simon Esmonde Cleary th
- Page 191 and 192: Chapter Ten Early Historic Britain
- Page 193 and 194: • 178 • Catherine Hills retrosp
- Page 195 and 196: • 180 • Catherine Hills and the
- Page 197 and 198: • 182 • Catherine Hills Early m
- Page 199 and 200: • 184 • Catherine Hills but the
- Page 201 and 202: • 186 • Catherine Hills Attenti
- Page 203 and 204: • 188 • Catherine Hills are har
- Page 205 and 206: • 190 • Catherine Hills grave a
- Page 207 and 208: • 192 • Catherine Hills Figure
• 144 • W.S.Hanson<br />
Figure 8.5 Site plans: forts: a. Elginhaugh; b. Housesteads; c. Vindolanda; d. Richborough.<br />
right up to its walls (Crow 1995). <strong>The</strong> stone walls <strong>of</strong> the fort, with associated gates and towers, as<br />
well as the headquarters building, commanding <strong>of</strong>ficer’s house, granaries, hospital, latrine and<br />
some barrack blocks within it, have been consolidated and put on public display (see Figure<br />
8.5b), along with some <strong>of</strong> the buildings <strong>of</strong> the civil settlement (‘vicus’) outside the south gate.<br />
Vindolanda (Chesterholm), Northumberland<br />
<strong>The</strong> Roman fort at Vindolanda, situated only some 3 km south <strong>of</strong> Housesteads, has a complex<br />
history. It was founded in the Late Flavian period (later first century AD), presumably as part <strong>of</strong><br />
the military consolidation in northern England, but some years after its initial conquest. In the<br />
second century AD, the fort continued in use as one <strong>of</strong> the garrison posts along the Trajanic<br />
Stanegate frontier, and, like Corbridge, occupation appears to have continued even with the<br />
construction <strong>of</strong> Hadrian’s Wall and the moving <strong>of</strong> garrisons up to its line. <strong>The</strong> original timberbuilt<br />
fort was replaced in stone on a slightly different alignment probably in the later second<br />
century, and continued to be occupied through until the late fourth or early fifth (Figure 8.5c).<br />
<strong>The</strong> rampart walls and headquarters building <strong>of</strong> this stone fort have also been consolidated for<br />
public display, along with the external bath house and buildings <strong>of</strong> a civil settlement. <strong>The</strong> major<br />
importance <strong>of</strong> this site, however, derives <strong>from</strong> the ex<strong>ca</strong>vation <strong>of</strong> the deeply buried earlier timber<br />
fort: its waterlogged state has preserved an exciting range <strong>of</strong> environmental evidence and organic<br />
artefacts, including writing tablets. <strong>The</strong>se include elements <strong>of</strong> the fort’s administrative archive<br />
and copies <strong>of</strong> private letters (Bowman 1994).