The Archaeology of Britain: An introduction from ... - waughfamily.ca
The Archaeology of Britain: An introduction from ... - waughfamily.ca The Archaeology of Britain: An introduction from ... - waughfamily.ca
The Iron Age • 127 • Lodsworth (West Sussex) were distributed over much greater areas than earlier saddle querns. The latter, variable in shape and size, suggest that an activity once undertaken by individual communities had become more centralized. In northern England, however, the changeover to rotary querns saw greater reliance on local sources, at the expense of high quality products from further afield. Iron Age production thus does not conform to a simple model of increasing centralization through time. The existing Late Bronze Age fine wares set the tone for Earlier Iron Age ceramic developments in southern Britain (Cunliffe 1991). Alongside coarse wares, most early assemblages contain a significant proportion of decorated forms such as situlate jars with finger-tip impressions, or furrowed bowls, often with a glossy red haematite coating, presumably intended to replicate the metal vessels from which they were copied (Figure 7.10). From the late sixth century BC, partly under continental influence, new forms appeared, including vessels with markedly angular profiles and pedestal bases. The Western Isles too developed distinctive decorated Figure 7.10 Selected Iron Age pottery: 1–3. Early Iron Age types; 4. scratchcordoned bowl; 5–7. angular and pedestal forms; 8. Middle Iron Age decorated pottery, which was used for most of the later first millennium BC. While bowl; 9–10. saucepan pottery; 11. Glastonbury ware; 12. Western Isles jar; most wares were locally produced, a 13. Poole Harbour ware; 14–15. Late Iron Age forms; 16. buttbeaker copy. few fine wares, like the distinctive Sources: 1–10, 12 and 14—Cunliffe 1991; 11—Coles, J.M., 1987. Meare Village scratch-cordoned bowls of Wessex, East: the excavations of A.Bulleid and H. St George Gray 1932–56. Exeter: Somerset Levels Papers 13; 13—Cunliffe, B.W., 1987. Hengistbury Head, Dorset, Vol. 1. were exchanged more widely. Oxford: Oxford University Committee for Archaeology Monograph; 15— During the Later Iron Age, the Fitzpatrick 1997; 16—Stead, I.M. and Rigby, V, 1989. Verulamium: the King character of pottery production Harry Lane site. London: English Heritage Archaeology Report 12 altered significantly. Over much of southern England, distinctive regional traditions dominated by new forms of decorated jars or bowls emerged, including a distinctive form known as ‘saucepan pots’. In some areas, such as the Welsh Marches and south-west England, local workshops all but disappeared in favour of production concentrated at a few locations, wares from which were then exchanged over considerable distances (Morris 1994). Wessex shows evidence for both local and regional
• 128 • Colin Haselgrove distribution, although by the end of the period potters in the Wareham-Poole Harbour (Dorset) area were supplying highly standardized wares to most of the surrounding region. In much of Britain, however, localized manufacture remained the norm until the Roman conquest. The introduction of the fast potter’s wheel in the late second century BC led to the appearance in eastern and southern England of curvaceous new ceramic forms with horizontal grooves or raised cordons. Not all areas adopted the new technology, and traditional handmade vessels often continued in use alongside finer, wheel-thrown forms. When Roman pottery began to be imported in quantity after c.20 BC, the new shapes—beakers, cups, dishes, flagons, lids and platters—were quickly copied. Although domestic ovens are common on settlements, there is no firm evidence for pre-Roman pottery kilns in Britain, and even wheel-thrown vessels were probably fired in simple bonfire-clamps. Bronze luxury goods were probably made by a small number of highly skilled and possibly itinerant metalworkers, adept in working both sheet and cast metal, and conversant with continental fashions. At Gussage All Saints (Dorset), a single pit yielded enough casting moulds for 50 sets of horse gear and vehicle fittings, although the context of this operation remains uncertain (Wainwright 1979). Another relatively small settlement, at Weelsby Avenue, Grimsby (Humberside), yielded debris, including failed castings, from the manufacture of horse harness, although here the evidence suggests a longer timespan for production. The main sources of copper, tin and lead seem to have been in the west and south-west, although some metal may have been imported. From the late first century BC onward, imported Roman brass (an alloy of copper and zinc) was often used for decorative metalwork in place of tin bronze. The categories of decorative metalwork found reflect the same social and ritual preoccupations —feasting, warfare and driving vehicles—as in the Later Bronze Age. Sheet bronze was employed for cauldrons, shields and scabbards, and to clad wooden objects like buckets and tankards, while lost-wax casting was used for chariot fittings and horse harness, and to make components of composite artefacts like mirrors and torcs. A range of decorative techniques such as engraving and repoussé work, adding coloured ornament such as coral and enamel, and plating were all used. Based on the evolving form and decoration of the objects, insular art is divided into five stages (I–V), starting in the fifth century BC and lasting to the early centuries AD (Stead 1996). Gold and silver objects were rare until the later second century BC, when imported Gallo- Belgic gold coinage began to circulate in south-east England and hoards containing torcs were buried in some numbers. The presence at Snettisham of older torcs indicates that such objects may have been less uncommon in earlier centuries than the archaeological record now suggests. By the later first century BC, most areas of lowland Britain were striking gold and silver coinages (De Jersey 1996). Copper-alloy coinage is, however, confined to south-east England, where struck types replaced cast issues at about this time. Most later coinages bear the name of the issuing ruler in Roman letters (Figure 7.11). No British coin dies have yet been found, but several oppida have yielded baked-clay slab moulds, evidently used for minting or other forms of high status metalworking. ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL CHANGES Climatic and environmental deterioration persisted well into the Iron Age. Continued retreat from upland areas and competition for land in favoured lowlands are likely to have been factors behind the construction of many early hillforts. The prominence of storage facilities confirms the importance of food supplies to such sites, many of which are in areas like southern Scotland
- Page 91 and 92: • 76 • Alasdair Whittle Moffett
- Page 93 and 94: • 78 • Mike Parker Pearson diff
- Page 95 and 96: • 80 • Mike Parker Pearson Figu
- Page 97 and 98: • 82 • Mike Parker Pearson argu
- Page 99 and 100: • 84 • Mike Parker Pearson Late
- Page 101 and 102: • 86 • Mike Parker Pearson been
- Page 103 and 104: • 88 • Mike Parker Pearson Figu
- Page 105 and 106: • 90 • Mike Parker Pearson are
- Page 107 and 108: • 92 • Mike Parker Pearson Bron
- Page 109 and 110: • 94 • Mike Parker Pearson Elli
- Page 111 and 112: • 96 • Timothy Champion For the
- Page 113 and 114: • 98 • Timothy Champion Perhaps
- Page 115 and 116: • 100 • Timothy Champion Figure
- Page 117 and 118: • 102 • Timothy Champion Little
- Page 119 and 120: • 104 • Timothy Champion CRAFT,
- Page 121 and 122: • 106 • Timothy Champion solely
- Page 123 and 124: • 108 • Timothy Champion and re
- Page 125 and 126: • 110 • Timothy Champion range
- Page 127 and 128: • 112 • Timothy Champion Coles,
- Page 129 and 130: • 114 • Colin Haselgrove votive
- Page 131 and 132: • 116 • Colin Haselgrove Figure
- Page 133 and 134: • 118 • Colin Haselgrove Figure
- Page 135 and 136: • 120 • Colin Haselgrove ancill
- Page 137 and 138: • 122 • Colin Haselgrove East A
- Page 139 and 140: • 124 • Colin Haselgrove France
- Page 141: • 126 • Colin Haselgrove As in
- Page 145 and 146: • 130 • Colin Haselgrove From 1
- Page 147 and 148: • 132 • Colin Haselgrove throug
- Page 149 and 150: • 134 • Colin Haselgrove Stead,
- Page 151 and 152: • 136 • W.S.Hanson Table 8.1 Ev
- Page 153 and 154: • 138 • W.S.Hanson country are
- Page 155 and 156: • 140 • W.S.Hanson eventually s
- Page 157 and 158: • 142 • W.S.Hanson Figure 8.4 S
- Page 159 and 160: • 144 • W.S.Hanson Figure 8.5 S
- Page 161 and 162: • 146 • W.S.Hanson Westerton, P
- Page 163 and 164: • 148 • W.S.Hanson Figure 8.8 A
- Page 165 and 166: • 150 • W.S.Hanson around 1900,
- Page 167 and 168: • 152 • W.S.Hanson provision of
- Page 169 and 170: • 154 • W.S.Hanson Figure 8.11
- Page 171 and 172: • 156 • W.S.Hanson Bibliography
- Page 173 and 174: • 158 • Simon Esmonde Cleary th
- Page 175 and 176: • 160 • Simon Esmonde Cleary pe
- Page 177 and 178: • 162 • Simon Esmonde Cleary Fi
- Page 179 and 180: • 164 • Simon Esmonde Cleary li
- Page 181 and 182: • 166 • Simon Esmonde Cleary Ot
- Page 183 and 184: • 168 • Simon Esmonde Cleary si
- Page 185 and 186: • 170 • Simon Esmonde Cleary ra
- Page 187 and 188: • 172 • Simon Esmonde Cleary si
- Page 189 and 190: • 174 • Simon Esmonde Cleary th
- Page 191 and 192: Chapter Ten Early Historic Britain
<strong>The</strong> Iron Age<br />
• 127 •<br />
Lodsworth (West Sussex) were<br />
distributed over much greater areas<br />
than earlier saddle querns. <strong>The</strong> latter,<br />
variable in shape and size, suggest<br />
that an activity once undertaken by<br />
individual communities had become<br />
more centralized. In northern<br />
England, however, the changeover to<br />
rotary querns saw greater reliance on<br />
lo<strong>ca</strong>l sources, at the expense <strong>of</strong> high<br />
quality products <strong>from</strong> further afield.<br />
Iron Age production thus does not<br />
conform to a simple model <strong>of</strong><br />
increasing centralization through<br />
time.<br />
<strong>The</strong> existing Late Bronze Age fine<br />
wares set the tone for Earlier Iron<br />
Age ceramic developments in<br />
southern <strong>Britain</strong> (Cunliffe 1991).<br />
Alongside coarse wares, most early<br />
assemblages contain a signifi<strong>ca</strong>nt<br />
proportion <strong>of</strong> decorated forms such<br />
as situlate jars with finger-tip<br />
impressions, or furrowed bowls,<br />
<strong>of</strong>ten with a glossy red haematite<br />
coating, presumably intended to<br />
repli<strong>ca</strong>te the metal vessels <strong>from</strong><br />
which they were copied (Figure 7.10).<br />
From the late sixth century BC, partly<br />
under continental influence, new<br />
forms appeared, including vessels<br />
with markedly angular pr<strong>of</strong>iles and<br />
pedestal bases. <strong>The</strong> Western Isles too<br />
developed distinctive decorated<br />
Figure 7.10 Selected Iron Age pottery: 1–3. Early Iron Age types; 4. scratchcordoned<br />
bowl; 5–7. angular and pedestal forms; 8. Middle Iron Age decorated<br />
pottery, which was used for most <strong>of</strong><br />
the later first millennium BC. While bowl; 9–10. saucepan pottery; 11. Glastonbury ware; 12. Western Isles jar;<br />
most wares were lo<strong>ca</strong>lly produced, a 13. Poole Harbour ware; 14–15. Late Iron Age forms; 16. buttbeaker copy.<br />
few fine wares, like the distinctive Sources: 1–10, 12 and 14—Cunliffe 1991; 11—Coles, J.M., 1987. Meare Village<br />
scratch-cordoned bowls <strong>of</strong> Wessex, East: the ex<strong>ca</strong>vations <strong>of</strong> A.Bulleid and H. St George Gray 1932–56. Exeter: Somerset<br />
Levels Papers 13; 13—Cunliffe, B.W., 1987. Hengistbury Head, Dorset, Vol. 1.<br />
were exchanged more widely.<br />
Oxford: Oxford University Committee for <strong>Archaeology</strong> Monograph; 15—<br />
During the Later Iron Age, the Fitzpatrick 1997; 16—Stead, I.M. and Rigby, V, 1989. Verulamium: the King<br />
character <strong>of</strong> pottery production Harry Lane site. London: English Heritage <strong>Archaeology</strong> Report 12<br />
altered signifi<strong>ca</strong>ntly. Over much <strong>of</strong><br />
southern England, distinctive regional traditions dominated by new forms <strong>of</strong> decorated jars or<br />
bowls emerged, including a distinctive form known as ‘saucepan pots’. In some areas, such as<br />
the Welsh Marches and south-west England, lo<strong>ca</strong>l workshops all but disappeared in favour <strong>of</strong><br />
production concentrated at a few lo<strong>ca</strong>tions, wares <strong>from</strong> which were then exchanged over<br />
considerable distances (Morris 1994). Wessex shows evidence for both lo<strong>ca</strong>l and regional