The Archaeology of Britain: An introduction from ... - waughfamily.ca
The Archaeology of Britain: An introduction from ... - waughfamily.ca The Archaeology of Britain: An introduction from ... - waughfamily.ca
Chapter Seven The Iron Age Colin Haselgrove INTRODUCTION The Iron Age is usually taken as spanning the period from the later eighth century BC until the first century AD. No single archaeological horizon clearly marks the transition from the Late Bronze Age, however, while the Roman conquest took three generations to complete and affected only part of the island. Many attributes once used to define the Iron Age—including the construction of hillforts and the development of a new repertoire of domestic pottery—can now be traced back into the Late Bronze Age. The adoption of iron technology was itself a lengthy process, difficult to follow in its earlier stages due to a lack of relevant evidence. Although the new metal was certainly worked from early in the first millennium BC, it initially seems to have had only limited impact, and it was not until the Later Iron Age that major social and economic changes occurred. The period is characterized above all by its plentiful and diverse settlement evidence. Over 3,000 dwelling sites survive as upstanding monuments, while almost as many again are recorded as cropmarks. They range from individual farmsteads occupied by a single household to hillforts holding communities of several hundred. The imposing drystone towers (brochs) of Atlantic Scotland are architecturally amongst the most sophisticated structures in Iron Age Europe, while the linear earthwork complexes (‘territorial oppida’) of south-east England are among the largest. Significant spatial and temporal variations exist: open settlements of village size are characteristic of eastern England, while large hillforts occur primarily in Wessex, the Welsh Marches and eastern Scotland. Many settlement types in western coastal regions are extremely long-lived and so cannot be considered characteristic solely of the Iron Age; these include small defended enclosures called raths and duns and the artificial lake dwellings known as crannogs. Iron Age landscapes also included field systems, trackways and linear boundaries. Unless directly associated with settlements, these are difficult to distinguish from their Bronze Age and Roman counterparts. An important recent advance has been the recognition in the English-Scottish borders of extensive traces of upland cultivation, termed cord rig. Non-habitation sites are rare, but include Later Iron Age religious sites, as well as production sites for salt, shale and quernstones. Throughout the Iron Age, most of the dead were disposed of in ways that leave no archaeological traces; visible burial rites are restricted to a few regions. The lack of burials, coupled with the sudden decline in hoarding from the eighth century BC, has significantly affected the nature of surviving Iron Age material culture, most of which comes from settlements, where diagnostic metalwork is relatively rare. Most such objects are isolated
• 114 • Colin Haselgrove votive finds from east-flowing rivers like the Thames and Witham, or come from hoards of late date. Even small items like brooches (Figure 7.1) —useful for dating due to their affinities with the continental Hallstatt and La Tène cultures—do not become common until the very end of the period. By default, pottery generally forms the basis of settlement chronology, but outside southern and eastern England and the Scottish islands, it, too, is scarce and shows little typological change over several centuries. Its place was presumably taken by organic Figure 7.1 Selected Iron Age brooch types: 1. Early La Tène; 2. Involuted: containers which survive only in 3. Penannular; 4. Nauheim; 5. Boss-on-bow; 6. Aucissa. exceptional conditions. Because of soil acidity, sizeable assemblages of animal bone are similarly missing from sites in northern and western Britain. A further contrast with the south and east is the near-total absence of grain storage pits, common in chalk and limestone areas, where they form a major source of artefactual and environmental data. Based on changes in decorated pottery styles, the Iron Age to the south and east of a line drawn from the Bristol Channel to the Humber is often sub-divided into three phases: Early (c.800/700–300 BC), Middle (c.300–100 BC) and Late (c.100 BC-AD 43/84). To the north and west, the period is difficult to divide into meaningful phases, except at purely local levels. It is sufficient here to distinguish between an Earlier Iron Age, lasting until the fourth century BC, which shares many attributes with the Later Bronze Age, and a Later Iron Age, starting c.300 BC, when insular societies entered a new period of transition. This reached its climax in the first century AD, after Julius Caesar’s conquest of northern France and invasions of Britain had brought the south into direct contact with the Roman world. THE RECENT DEVELOPMENT OF IRON AGE STUDIES Until the 1960s, perceptions of the period were shaped by Fox’s (1932) classic division of Britain into Highland and Lowland zones. With its poorer soils and climate, the Highland zone was thought to have been sparsely occupied by pastoralists, in contrast to the Lowland zone which was densely populated by mixed farmers. This latter region, nearer the Continent, was also seen as relatively open to externally induced cultural change, unlike the conservative Highland zone where innovations were taken up at best gradually. This emphasis on continental influence accorded with Caesar’s mention of Belgic immigrants from northern France, whom archaeologists like Hawkes (1960) saw as responsible for introducing coinage, cremation and wheel-made pottery in the first century BC (during Hawkes’ Iron Age C). Earlier invaders were similarly credited with the introduction of iron and of hillforts (Iron Age A), and with the subsequent imposition of continental Early La Tène culture in certain regions (Iron Age B). In the 1960s, this model was challenged as intellectual fashions changed. In a seminal study, Hodson (1964) argued that few of the supposed invasions were represented by clear-cut
- Page 77 and 78: • 62 • Alasdair Whittle resourc
- Page 79 and 80: • 64 • Alasdair Whittle Figure
- Page 81 and 82: • 66 • Alasdair Whittle other s
- Page 83 and 84: • 68 • Alasdair Whittle Figure
- Page 85 and 86: • 70 • Alasdair Whittle inter-
- Page 87 and 88: • 72 • Alasdair Whittle hundred
- Page 89 and 90: • 74 • Alasdair Whittle and els
- Page 91 and 92: • 76 • Alasdair Whittle Moffett
- Page 93 and 94: • 78 • Mike Parker Pearson diff
- Page 95 and 96: • 80 • Mike Parker Pearson Figu
- Page 97 and 98: • 82 • Mike Parker Pearson argu
- Page 99 and 100: • 84 • Mike Parker Pearson Late
- Page 101 and 102: • 86 • Mike Parker Pearson been
- Page 103 and 104: • 88 • Mike Parker Pearson Figu
- Page 105 and 106: • 90 • Mike Parker Pearson are
- Page 107 and 108: • 92 • Mike Parker Pearson Bron
- Page 109 and 110: • 94 • Mike Parker Pearson Elli
- Page 111 and 112: • 96 • Timothy Champion For the
- Page 113 and 114: • 98 • Timothy Champion Perhaps
- Page 115 and 116: • 100 • Timothy Champion Figure
- Page 117 and 118: • 102 • Timothy Champion Little
- Page 119 and 120: • 104 • Timothy Champion CRAFT,
- Page 121 and 122: • 106 • Timothy Champion solely
- Page 123 and 124: • 108 • Timothy Champion and re
- Page 125 and 126: • 110 • Timothy Champion range
- Page 127: • 112 • Timothy Champion Coles,
- Page 131 and 132: • 116 • Colin Haselgrove Figure
- Page 133 and 134: • 118 • Colin Haselgrove Figure
- Page 135 and 136: • 120 • Colin Haselgrove ancill
- Page 137 and 138: • 122 • Colin Haselgrove East A
- Page 139 and 140: • 124 • Colin Haselgrove France
- Page 141 and 142: • 126 • Colin Haselgrove As in
- Page 143 and 144: • 128 • Colin Haselgrove distri
- Page 145 and 146: • 130 • Colin Haselgrove From 1
- Page 147 and 148: • 132 • Colin Haselgrove throug
- Page 149 and 150: • 134 • Colin Haselgrove Stead,
- Page 151 and 152: • 136 • W.S.Hanson Table 8.1 Ev
- Page 153 and 154: • 138 • W.S.Hanson country are
- Page 155 and 156: • 140 • W.S.Hanson eventually s
- Page 157 and 158: • 142 • W.S.Hanson Figure 8.4 S
- Page 159 and 160: • 144 • W.S.Hanson Figure 8.5 S
- Page 161 and 162: • 146 • W.S.Hanson Westerton, P
- Page 163 and 164: • 148 • W.S.Hanson Figure 8.8 A
- Page 165 and 166: • 150 • W.S.Hanson around 1900,
- Page 167 and 168: • 152 • W.S.Hanson provision of
- Page 169 and 170: • 154 • W.S.Hanson Figure 8.11
- Page 171 and 172: • 156 • W.S.Hanson Bibliography
- Page 173 and 174: • 158 • Simon Esmonde Cleary th
- Page 175 and 176: • 160 • Simon Esmonde Cleary pe
- Page 177 and 178: • 162 • Simon Esmonde Cleary Fi
Chapter Seven<br />
<strong>The</strong> Iron Age<br />
Colin Haselgrove<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
<strong>The</strong> Iron Age is usually taken as spanning the period <strong>from</strong> the later eighth century BC until the<br />
first century AD. No single archaeologi<strong>ca</strong>l horizon clearly marks the transition <strong>from</strong> the Late<br />
Bronze Age, however, while the Roman conquest took three generations to complete and affected<br />
only part <strong>of</strong> the island. Many attributes once used to define the Iron Age—including the<br />
construction <strong>of</strong> hillforts and the development <strong>of</strong> a new repertoire <strong>of</strong> domestic pottery—<strong>ca</strong>n<br />
now be traced back into the Late Bronze Age. <strong>The</strong> adoption <strong>of</strong> iron technology was itself a<br />
lengthy process, difficult to follow in its earlier stages due to a lack <strong>of</strong> relevant evidence. Although<br />
the new metal was certainly worked <strong>from</strong> early in the first millennium BC, it initially seems to<br />
have had only limited impact, and it was not until the Later Iron Age that major social and<br />
economic changes occurred.<br />
<strong>The</strong> period is characterized above all by its plentiful and diverse settlement evidence. Over<br />
3,000 dwelling sites survive as upstanding monuments, while almost as many again are recorded<br />
as cropmarks. <strong>The</strong>y range <strong>from</strong> individual farmsteads occupied by a single household to hillforts<br />
holding communities <strong>of</strong> several hundred. <strong>The</strong> imposing drystone towers (brochs) <strong>of</strong> Atlantic<br />
Scotland are architecturally amongst the most sophisti<strong>ca</strong>ted structures in Iron Age Europe, while<br />
the linear earthwork complexes (‘territorial oppida’) <strong>of</strong> south-east England are among the largest.<br />
Signifi<strong>ca</strong>nt spatial and temporal variations exist: open settlements <strong>of</strong> village size are characteristic<br />
<strong>of</strong> eastern England, while large hillforts occur primarily in Wessex, the Welsh Marches and eastern<br />
Scotland. Many settlement types in western coastal regions are extremely long-lived and so <strong>ca</strong>nnot<br />
be considered characteristic solely <strong>of</strong> the Iron Age; these include small defended enclosures<br />
<strong>ca</strong>lled raths and duns and the artificial lake dwellings known as crannogs.<br />
Iron Age lands<strong>ca</strong>pes also included field systems, trackways and linear boundaries. Unless directly<br />
associated with settlements, these are difficult to distinguish <strong>from</strong> their Bronze Age and Roman<br />
counterparts. <strong>An</strong> important recent advance has been the recognition in the English-Scottish borders<br />
<strong>of</strong> extensive traces <strong>of</strong> upland cultivation, termed cord rig. Non-habitation sites are rare, but<br />
include Later Iron Age religious sites, as well as production sites for salt, shale and quernstones.<br />
Throughout the Iron Age, most <strong>of</strong> the dead were disposed <strong>of</strong> in ways that leave no archaeologi<strong>ca</strong>l<br />
traces; visible burial rites are restricted to a few regions.<br />
<strong>The</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> burials, coupled with the sudden decline in hoarding <strong>from</strong> the eighth century BC,<br />
has signifi<strong>ca</strong>ntly affected the nature <strong>of</strong> surviving Iron Age material culture, most <strong>of</strong> which comes<br />
<strong>from</strong> settlements, where diagnostic metalwork is relatively rare. Most such objects are isolated