03.05.2015 Views

Wedderburn book; a history of the Wedderburns in ... - waughfamily.ca

Wedderburn book; a history of the Wedderburns in ... - waughfamily.ca

Wedderburn book; a history of the Wedderburns in ... - waughfamily.ca

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

180 THE WEDDERBURN BOOK.<br />

Part II.<br />

Chap. V,<br />

8 Feb. 1821)1; but at length, 2 July 1821, <strong>the</strong> Privy Council, while <strong>the</strong>y postponed<br />

without decision his right to appear at <strong>the</strong> coronation, approved his hereditary title to <strong>the</strong><br />

Office he claimed and he w;xs presented a.s royal standard bearer at <strong>the</strong> K<strong>in</strong>g's levee at Ed<strong>in</strong>burgh<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g year. The <strong>of</strong>fice is now held bv his grandson and successor, whose<br />

attendance as Hereditary Royal Standard Bearer <strong>of</strong> Scotland, toge<strong>the</strong>r with that <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r great Scottish <strong>of</strong>ficers <strong>of</strong> state, was commanded by <strong>the</strong> (jueen when Her<br />

Majesty unveiled <strong>the</strong> statue <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Pr<strong>in</strong>ce Consort iu Charlotte Square. Ed<strong>in</strong>burgh,<br />

17 Aug. 18/ C- '<br />

^ '<br />

Like his bro<strong>the</strong>r Alexander, he at one time contemplated establish<strong>in</strong>g his ri'dit to <strong>the</strong><br />

Earldom <strong>of</strong> Dundee and Viscountcy <strong>of</strong> Dudhopo before <strong>the</strong> Houvc <strong>of</strong> Lords, and "cont<strong>in</strong>ued<br />

to some extent <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestigation begun by his bro<strong>the</strong>r, with <strong>the</strong> assist^uice <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> em<strong>in</strong>ent<br />

bcotch peerage lawyer, Mr. J. Riddell, but beyond this took no active ste[)s.^<br />

He took much <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> ihe preparation by J.W. <strong>of</strong> his pr<strong>in</strong>ted memoir <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Wedderbums<br />

and gave him every opportunity and <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong> his power, but <strong>the</strong> mass <strong>of</strong> documents<br />

<strong>in</strong> his possession relat<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> ^Vedderburns seems to have rema<strong>in</strong>ed practi<strong>ca</strong>lly<br />

unexam<strong>in</strong>ed.* Several letters passed between <strong>the</strong>m on <strong>the</strong> subject (S.W. 70.5. TOG ; J.W.<br />

12, 13), and <strong>the</strong>re are also some letters to Henry Scryni-eour-Weddc'rburn' from<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r members <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> family, <strong>in</strong>cidentally conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g notes <strong>of</strong> family matters,* which I<br />

have made use <strong>of</strong> iu <strong>the</strong> accounts <strong>of</strong> those to whom <strong>the</strong>y refer. At one time, 17 Feb. 1835<br />

(S.W. 721), <strong>the</strong>re was talk between him and my grandfa<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong>n at Auchterhouse, near<br />

Dundee, <strong>of</strong> his restor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Weddcrburn monuments <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Howff', but noth<strong>in</strong>g was done,<br />

and we <strong>ca</strong>n only regret that this work was left untouched till nearly sixty "v<strong>ca</strong>rs later<br />

(1892-93), when <strong>the</strong> condition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> so long neglected stones had become hopelessly bad<br />

(see post, s. <strong>the</strong> Chapter on <strong>the</strong> Howll).<br />

Mr. Scryrageour-<strong>Wedderburn</strong> died at Ed<strong>in</strong>burgh 20 Eec. 1841 (Gent. Mar/, vol. xvii.,<br />

p. 228). There is a f<strong>in</strong>e portrait <strong>of</strong> him at Birkhill, pa<strong>in</strong>ted by Raeburu <strong>in</strong> ]S22,« as well<br />

as one <strong>of</strong> his wife by George Watson, and a group by <strong>the</strong> latter artist <strong>of</strong> three <strong>of</strong> liis'childreii<br />

(Frederick, JIatilda, and Euphemia) when young. There are also m<strong>in</strong>iatures <strong>of</strong> most <strong>of</strong><br />

his daughters at Birkhill. A facsimile <strong>of</strong> his signature is given opposite p. 72 <strong>of</strong> vol. ii.<br />

He had married at Ed<strong>in</strong>burgh, 5 April 1793,' Mary Turner Maitland,* eldest<br />

daughter to Capta<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Hou. Frederick Lewis Maitlaud, R.N., sixth son <strong>of</strong> Charles, sistli<br />

' This and o<strong>the</strong>r letters on <strong>the</strong> subject are iu <strong>the</strong> Scrymgeoiir-WedJerburn Charter Chest, vi., xii., 128-38,<br />

anil see J.W. 15.<br />

= See letters to him frona <strong>the</strong> Secretary <strong>of</strong> .St.^te, 23 July, 1, 2 Aug. 1876, now at Birkhill. Among <strong>the</strong>o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

<strong>of</strong>iBcera <strong>of</strong> state who attended with him were <strong>the</strong> Lord Keeper <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Privy Seal (Marquis ut Lothian),<br />

<strong>the</strong> Keeper <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Great Seal (E«rl <strong>of</strong> Selkirk), <strong>the</strong> I,. .rd Justice Clerk. Lord Clerk Register, Lord<br />

Justice General, and Lord Advo<strong>ca</strong>te ;<br />

<strong>the</strong> hereditary Standard Bearer (Earl <strong>of</strong> Lauderdale) and <strong>the</strong><br />

hereditary Armour Bearer (Sir H. J. Setou-Stewart, Bart.).<br />

* When I <strong>ca</strong>me to exaniiue <strong>the</strong> Charter Chest and collect toge<strong>the</strong>r all <strong>the</strong> material Scrymgeour and W'edderburn<br />

documents, ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong> it or at Birkhill, I found that Mr. Kiddell had <strong>in</strong>ventoried barely one<br />

sixth <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> documents cow <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> chest. See vol. ii., pp. 3 and 84-83, where it appears that <strong>the</strong>re<br />

are now some 2 500 jiapers, out <strong>of</strong> which Mr. Riddell <strong>in</strong>ventoried 371.<br />

* Alexander Scrymgeour- Wedderburu had made a cursory exam<strong>in</strong>ation for Lord Loughborough <strong>in</strong> 1782,<br />

and had <strong>the</strong>n drawn up a list <strong>of</strong> some twenty-five VVedderburu documeuts (S.W. 669), which J. W.<br />

seems also to have exam<strong>in</strong>ed ; but <strong>the</strong> greater mass, if looked at. were nut dealt with.<br />

5 See S.W. 702, 703, 707-9, 711, 714, 7!5, 716, 718, 721 ; and J.W. 11-20 ; for letters to him from J.W.<br />

and Charles <strong>Wedderburn</strong> <strong>of</strong> Pearsie. There are also some lettei-s from Sir James Webster-<br />

Wedderburu, viz., 6 March 1824, ask<strong>in</strong>g him to be a trustee <strong>of</strong> his marriage settlement which H.S.W.<br />

decl<strong>in</strong>ed (S.W. 712-13) : 16 Dec. 1S29, to give evidence as to Sir James' (supposed) claim to <strong>the</strong><br />

Blackness baronetcy (post, Part III , chap, ix.) and also <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 'Wedderbura suit (see post, ibid.),<br />

but H.S.W. does not seem to have encouraged <strong>the</strong> correspondence.<br />

* The receipt for this picture is at Birkhill. It is dated 24 April 1822, and <strong>the</strong> price <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> picture was<br />

eighty gu<strong>in</strong>eas.<br />

^ There is a family register <strong>in</strong> his hand <strong>in</strong> an old ('1762) Bible at Birkhill. beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g " Henry Scrymgeour and<br />

Mary Turner .Maitland were married at Ed<strong>in</strong>burgh on <strong>the</strong> fifth day <strong>of</strong> .\pril 1793," after which <strong>the</strong>re<br />

follows a list <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir children iu <strong>the</strong> above account <strong>of</strong> whom <strong>the</strong> entries reUt<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong>m are quoted.<br />

The numbers after each name give <strong>the</strong> priority <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> children irrespective <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir sex. The<br />

iLd<strong>in</strong>burjh Faritik Rcjixtcr not ha\<strong>in</strong>g beeu searched for <strong>the</strong> name <strong>of</strong> Scrymgeour, <strong>the</strong> entries <strong>of</strong><br />

H.S.W.'s marriage and his children's births, are not given <strong>in</strong> vol- ii., pp. 499 set/.<br />

' Her fa<strong>the</strong>r died 16 Dec. 1786 (S.W. 698), Iiav<strong>in</strong>g married 2S Aug. 1767. Her mo<strong>the</strong>r was Margaret Dick<br />

MakgiU, heiress <strong>of</strong> Raukeillour and Liudores. co. Fife, a descendant <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> same family as Jean<br />

McGill, who married John Scrymgeour <strong>of</strong> Kirktoun <strong>in</strong> 1624 (ante, p. 170). It appears that James<br />

McGill <strong>of</strong> Rankeillour who had made a settlement <strong>of</strong> his property <strong>in</strong> 1738, d.s.p,, and was<br />

fiucceeded by his sister Isobel McGill wlio m. <strong>the</strong> Rev. William Dick <strong>of</strong> Cupar and d. 13 Jan. 1787<br />

(S.W. 69S), and w.is succeeded by her grand-daughter Margaret 3Iaitland-Makgill, wlio d. 17 March<br />

1825 [ilaUland- .Mahjill Papers, S.W., yii., ii., B. 1-5).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!