Wedderburn book; a history of the Wedderburns in ... - waughfamily.ca

Wedderburn book; a history of the Wedderburns in ... - waughfamily.ca Wedderburn book; a history of the Wedderburns in ... - waughfamily.ca

waughfamily.ca
from waughfamily.ca More from this publisher
03.05.2015 Views

(D'B.R. DAVID, OF CRAIGIE. 57 17 May 1533, whoa ho uud his " kiusmau," lleury WcdJcrbuni, settle tlie boiiuJaries of Parti. their Murraygait lands (D.P.B. 50) ; and 2S May I 534, when he chari^es his property with Cbap. ill an annual rent (D.P.B. 51 b). On 13 March 1534 a leper of the nanie of William Bell assigned to him, "son of the late David," some Welgait land in trust for the lepei-s of the burgh (DC. 16), an entry indicative of his importance in the community. In the samo year he and his wife got a charter of the shadow half of Hiltoun of Cra'igie from John, Abbot of Lindores, 9 Oct. 153-5, confirmed to them under the (Jrcat Seal 10 Feb. 1539 (R I'.S. 6; U.S. It. iO) ; and this land is named as a boundary in the follcjwing year, 30 Aug. 1540 (D.C. 21). i They also got from Patrick, Lord Gray a charter of the mains of lluntlio, in the barony of Foulis, co Perth. 13 June 15lL', confirmed under the Great Seal 8 Aug. in that year (11 P.S. 7 ; G.S R. 30). He was at one time engaged in what seems to have been a family feud with the Rolloks (ante p. 7, n. 3), as \b April 1543 he was " fugitive from law and at the horn " for the slauirhter of David Rollok, and his sons, .lames and William, and tiie rest of his children, got a gift of the escheat of his goods (Il.P.S. lOi, while there is .-inother gift to Patrick, Lord Gray, of the escheat of his goods on G April in the same year (R.P.S. 1 1 ). The matter soon blew over, for by 25 Sept. following, he and his accomplices were all respited in respect of it {ib. \'A). The gap in the Dundee records then prevents our hearing of iiim for a time, but he can h;ive been under no ban when his name again arises. In 1550 (Feb. 1 1 ) he got a letter under the Privy Seal appointing him •' clerk of the coket " in Dundee, and " searcher of all gtMjds," an otlice which in later years was held by his son James (R.P.S. 18, 23).'' He is called " elder " 5-8 Juno 155 I 28 c), and is nominated on the Council 23 Sept. {ib 20 a). In the next month, 6 Oct , he, "elder,"' sells his mausiou to the town for i'OU, and accepts payment, 20 Oct., in the form of six burgess-ships {ib. 22 b, 32). Once more, May 1552, •') lie is called " elder," •when his payment for 420 barrels of beer is duly recorded {ib. 35). In this year he added to his Craigie propertj' by the acquisition from Patrick, Lonl Gray, of one-third of the Hiltoun of AVester Craigie, the charter to himself and his wife being confirmed under the Great Seal 8 Aug. (R.P S."20 ; G.S R. 31),3 and we find himdesigued "X'lder, of Gragy" vU.B.R. 40, 43). In the ne.xt year he got once more into trouble for violence and for having (in mixlern - • parlance) " obstructed the police in the execution of their duty."^ He and his two sons were charged with having " troubled and hurt Robert Merschell, officer of the burgh, in the execution of his duty.'' and although he, ou referring himself ' to God and a goixl as.iize " at Dundee, was acquitted 3 Xov., his sons were convicted (D.B R. 45), and he does not seem to have been quite cleared, as he thought it well to get a remission, 14 Dec, for both iiimself and his sons under the Privy Seal (R.P.S. 21 ). His property of the .Mains of Hiuitly is mentioned 13 Xov. 1554 (P.B.N. 1), and his Murravgait lands. Oct. l.'>o5, and 17 March 1558 (D.B.R. 61 « ; D.P.B. 92). He is, I think, the David Wedderimrn, co-owner of the ship James, named 25 May 1552, 16 Dec. 1555 (l).BR. 36. 58, 61 c). His |Ki>ition in Dundee is best shown, perhaps, by the fact that it was in his house of Craigie that the Council dejH^sited the Church plate of the burgh in time of war. Thus, 12 Aug. 1557, *"' the council and commuuitie hes receivit fra tlie hands of David Wedderburn of Cniii.'ie thir jewels underwritten ...which David had in keiping " {.Uaxweli's Old Dnwlcf, p. 1?S). He was defender to a suit 17 Jan. 1557 (M.B.R. 72), and lived to see his eider dan^ihter Isobcll married and provided for, 24 Dec. 1558 (U.P.B 88). His health was, however, failing. On 3 April 1559 his wife binds herself, in event of his death, to pmvido for his other daughter on her marriage (D.B.R. 86),'' and soon after " in hi-> lHX.'y hevelie weixit with inlirmitie and yit as apperit havand perfyte knowkdi^e and memoric " he made his will (K.P.B. 9.t). He died soon after, as 23 Aug. 1500 his s.^n James is named as his heir (D BR. 95) ; and 9-10 Oct., IS Nov., Helen biwson is calh-i his relict {ih. t'9, 103), while, 16 Feb 1560-61, the North Seagait land of the late D.ivid and iKe Ncrtli Murraygait land of the late Henry W'edderburn are mentioned (U.P.B. 107). (ttlur references to him may be found in connection with his son James (D.B.R. 112; IC.P.C. 25) > Mr. A. C. Lamb in his Dundee (p. 59) says that a portion of Craigie UIc.iiKf.l to n ri«viJ Wr.I.Irrl.urn in 14S0 and that in 1540 another David so held it, but I tiu.l no auU.ority f>T llie •lAtfUiciit as to 1480. , , . , . » He is not desifne.! ' el^er " or ' of Crairie," ic, in this entry, but I ni.ike no V IS. 16. * She is called '• spous " not "relict" in this entry, so that though hia "dccew" u rcfcn^l (u, ii »u contemplated only, and had not yet occurred.

(D'B.R.<br />

DAVID, OF CRAIGIE. 57<br />

17 May 1533, whoa ho uud his " kiusmau," lleury WcdJcrbuni, settle tlie boiiuJaries <strong>of</strong> Parti.<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir Murraygait lands (D.P.B. 50) ; and 2S May I 534, when he chari^es his property with<br />

Cbap. ill<br />

an annual rent (D.P.B. 51 b). On 13 March 1534 a leper <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> nanie <strong>of</strong> William Bell<br />

assigned to him, "son <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> late David," some Welgait land <strong>in</strong> trust for <strong>the</strong> lepei-s <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

burgh (DC. 16), an entry <strong>in</strong>di<strong>ca</strong>tive <strong>of</strong> his importance <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> community. In <strong>the</strong> samo<br />

year he and his wife got a charter <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> shadow half <strong>of</strong> Hiltoun <strong>of</strong> Cra'igie from John,<br />

Abbot <strong>of</strong> L<strong>in</strong>dores, 9 Oct. 153-5, confirmed to <strong>the</strong>m under <strong>the</strong> (Jr<strong>ca</strong>t Seal 10 Feb. 1539<br />

(R I'.S. 6; U.S. It. iO) ; and this land is named as a boundary <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> follcjw<strong>in</strong>g year,<br />

30 Aug. 1540 (D.C. 21). i They also got from Patrick, Lord Gray a charter <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>s<br />

<strong>of</strong> lluntlio, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> barony <strong>of</strong> Foulis, co Perth. 13 June 15lL', confirmed under <strong>the</strong><br />

Great Seal 8 Aug. <strong>in</strong> that year (11 P.S. 7 ; G.S R. 30). He was at one time engaged<br />

<strong>in</strong> what seems to have been a family feud with <strong>the</strong> Rolloks (ante p. 7, n. 3), as \b April<br />

1543 he was " fugitive from law and at <strong>the</strong> horn " for <strong>the</strong> slauirhter <strong>of</strong> David Rollok,<br />

and his sons, .lames and William, and tiie rest <strong>of</strong> his children, got a gift <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> escheat<br />

<strong>of</strong> his goods (Il.P.S. lOi, while <strong>the</strong>re is .-<strong>in</strong>o<strong>the</strong>r gift to Patrick, Lord Gray, <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> escheat<br />

<strong>of</strong> his goods on G April <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> same year (R.P.S. 1 1<br />

). The matter soon blew over, for by 25<br />

Sept. follow<strong>in</strong>g, he and his accomplices were all respited <strong>in</strong> respect <strong>of</strong> it {ib. \'A). The gap <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Dundee records <strong>the</strong>n prevents our hear<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> iiim for a time, but he <strong>ca</strong>n h;ive been under<br />

no ban when his name aga<strong>in</strong> arises. In 1550 (Feb. 1 1 ) he got a letter under <strong>the</strong> Privy Seal<br />

appo<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g him •' clerk <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> coket " <strong>in</strong> Dundee, and " searcher <strong>of</strong> all gtMjds," an otlice which<br />

<strong>in</strong> later years was held by his son James (R.P.S. 18, 23).'' He is <strong>ca</strong>lled " elder " 5-8 Juno<br />

155 I 28 c), and is nom<strong>in</strong>ated on <strong>the</strong> Council 23 Sept. {ib 20 a). In <strong>the</strong> next month,<br />

6 Oct ,<br />

he, "elder,"' sells his mausiou to <strong>the</strong> town for i'OU, and accepts payment, 20 Oct., <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> form <strong>of</strong> six burgess-ships {ib. 22 b, 32). Once more, May 1552, •') lie is <strong>ca</strong>lled " elder,"<br />

•when his payment for 420 barrels <strong>of</strong> beer is duly recorded {ib. 35). In this year he added to<br />

his Craigie propertj' by <strong>the</strong> acquisition from Patrick, Lonl Gray, <strong>of</strong> one-third <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Hiltoun<br />

<strong>of</strong> AVester Craigie, <strong>the</strong> charter to himself and his wife be<strong>in</strong>g confirmed under <strong>the</strong> Great Seal<br />

8 Aug. (R.P S."20 ; G.S R. 31),3 and we f<strong>in</strong>d himdesigued "X'lder, <strong>of</strong> Gragy" vU.B.R. 40, 43).<br />

In <strong>the</strong> ne.xt year he got once more <strong>in</strong>to trouble for violence and for hav<strong>in</strong>g (<strong>in</strong> mixlern - •<br />

parlance) " obstructed <strong>the</strong> police <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> execution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir duty."^ He and his two sons were<br />

charged with hav<strong>in</strong>g " troubled and hurt Robert Merschell, <strong>of</strong>ficer <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> burgh, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

execution <strong>of</strong> his duty.'' and although he, ou referr<strong>in</strong>g himself ' to God and a goixl as.iize " at<br />

Dundee, was acquitted 3 Xov., his sons were convicted (D.B R. 45), and he does not seem<br />

to have been quite cleared, as he thought it well to get a remission, 14 Dec, for both iiimself<br />

and his sons under <strong>the</strong> Privy Seal (R.P.S. 21 ). His property <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> .Ma<strong>in</strong>s <strong>of</strong> Hiuitly<br />

is mentioned 13 Xov. 1554 (P.B.N. 1), and his Murravgait lands. Oct. l.'>o5, and 17 March<br />

1558 (D.B.R. 61 « ; D.P.B. 92). He is, I th<strong>in</strong>k, <strong>the</strong> David Wedderimrn, co-owner <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

ship James, named 25 May 1552, 16 Dec. 1555 (l).BR. 36. 58, 61 c). His |Ki>ition <strong>in</strong><br />

Dundee is best shown, perhaps, by <strong>the</strong> fact that it was <strong>in</strong> his house <strong>of</strong> Craigie that <strong>the</strong><br />

Council dejH^sited <strong>the</strong> Church plate <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> burgh <strong>in</strong> time <strong>of</strong> war. Thus, 12 Aug. 1557, *"' <strong>the</strong><br />

council and commuuitie hes receivit fra tlie hands <strong>of</strong> David <strong>Wedderburn</strong> <strong>of</strong> Cniii.'ie thir<br />

jewels underwritten ...which David had <strong>in</strong> keip<strong>in</strong>g " {.Uaxweli's Old Dnwlcf, p. 1?S).<br />

He was defender to a suit 17 Jan. 1557 (M.B.R. 72), and lived to see his eider dan^ihter<br />

Isobcll married and provided for, 24 Dec. 1558 (U.P.B 88). His health was, however,<br />

fail<strong>in</strong>g. On 3 April 1559 his wife b<strong>in</strong>ds herself, <strong>in</strong> event <strong>of</strong> his death, to pmvido<br />

for his o<strong>the</strong>r daughter on her marriage (D.B.R. 86),'' and soon after " <strong>in</strong> hi-> lHX.'y<br />

hevelie weixit with <strong>in</strong>lirmitie and yit as apperit havand perfyte knowkdi^e and memoric "<br />

he made his will (K.P.B. 9.t). He died soon after, as 23 Aug. 1500 his s.^n James<br />

is named as his heir (D BR. 95) ; and 9-10 Oct., IS Nov., Helen biwson is <strong>ca</strong>lh-i his relict<br />

{ih. t'9, 103), while, 16 Feb 1560-61, <strong>the</strong> North Seagait land <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> late D.ivid and iKe Ncrtli<br />

Murraygait land <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> late Henry W'edderburn are mentioned (U.P.B. 107). (ttlur<br />

references to him may be found <strong>in</strong> connection with his son James (D.B.R. 112; IC.P.C. 25)<br />

> Mr. A. C. Lamb <strong>in</strong> his Dundee (p. 59) says that a portion <strong>of</strong> Craigie UIc.iiKf.l to n ri«viJ Wr.I.Irrl.urn<br />

<strong>in</strong> 14S0 and that <strong>in</strong> 1540 ano<strong>the</strong>r David so held it, but I tiu.l no auU.ority f>T llie •lAtfUiciit<br />

as to 1480.<br />

, , . , .<br />

» He is not desifne.! ' el^er " or ' <strong>of</strong> Crairie," ic, <strong>in</strong> this entry, but I ni.ike no V IS. 16.<br />

* She is <strong>ca</strong>lled '• spous " not "relict" <strong>in</strong> this entry, so that though hia "dccew" u rcfcn^l (u, ii »u<br />

contemplated only, and had not yet occurred.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!