02.05.2015 Views

view brochure (pdf) - Minnesota CLE

view brochure (pdf) - Minnesota CLE

view brochure (pdf) - Minnesota CLE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Keynotes by:<br />

Paul R. Michel<br />

C.A.F.C. Chief Judge, retired<br />

The 2011 Midwest<br />

Intellectual<br />

Property<br />

Institute<br />

All the Significant New IP Developments –<br />

Identified, Analyzed, Explained!<br />

Thursday & Friday, September 22 & 23, 2011<br />

<strong>Minnesota</strong> <strong>CLE</strong> Conference Center<br />

Seventh Street & Nicollet Mall, Third Floor City Center, Minneapolis<br />

Gerard F. Rogers<br />

T.T.A.B. Chief Judge<br />

Filip De Corte<br />

Chief IP Counsel for Europe, Cargill<br />

David A. Gauntlett<br />

Principal, Gauntlett & Associates<br />

New for 2011:<br />

36 All-New Sessions by Leading<br />

IP Lawyers<br />

New Crash Course Option for<br />

Lawyers New to IP<br />

New Edition of The IP Book<br />

All-Star Faculty Including Senior In-House Counsel<br />

from 3M, Best Buy, bluestem brands, Cargill,<br />

Ecolab, Hawkins Inc., Honeywell, Medtronic,<br />

Thomson Reuters, UnitedHealth Group,<br />

University of <strong>Minnesota</strong>, Valspar and Wells Fargo.


World-class intellectual property education<br />

tackling today’s most important issues.<br />

All the New Developments and Their Implications –<br />

Cut Through the Noise<br />

These days you don’t lack for information. The Supreme Court issues<br />

a decision or an agency issues regulations – before the day is out your<br />

inbox is likely near-flooded with the news (not to mention tweets, blog<br />

posts and sundry other methods for getting the word out fast). Such<br />

news delivery is useful in its way, to be sure, but when multiplied<br />

by the constant stream of new developments, it also creates a lot of<br />

“noise” that you’re left to sort through.<br />

The Institute helps you cut through that noise because it’s a onestop<br />

conference – one place, two days – providing comprehensive<br />

coverage of the intellectual property law landscape and its changes.<br />

Our Institute faculty have studied these developments, distilled the<br />

information, considered the implications, and added their insights and<br />

practice tips to develop the most practical instruction for you.<br />

A Talented Faculty All Preparing to Deliver<br />

Practical, Timely Education<br />

You’ll learn from, and can compare your practices with, experienced<br />

attorneys from private practice and IP-intensive industries. This year’s<br />

faculty also includes CAFC Chief Judge Paul Michel (ret.), TTAB<br />

Chief Judge Gerard Rogers, and federal District Court Judge James<br />

Rosenbaum (ret.). You’ll also hear from senior in-house counsel<br />

from 3M, Best Buy, bluestem brands, Cargill, Ecolab, Hawkins Inc.,<br />

Honeywell, Medtronic, Thomson Reuters, UnitedHealth Group,<br />

University of <strong>Minnesota</strong>, Valspar and Wells Fargo.<br />

4 All-New Alternate Plenary Sessions –<br />

A Practical Crash Course<br />

Looking for additional grounding, or a refresher, in one of the major<br />

IP areas? Check out this year’s four new alternate plenary sessions:<br />

“Conversational Patent,” “How to Clear and Register Your First<br />

Trademark,” “Top 10 Tips for Representing Copyright Owners,” and<br />

“How to Re<strong>view</strong> a Client’s IP Portfolio.”<br />

We’ve designed these fast-paced sessions to be extremely practical.<br />

Useful on their own, they also provide solid footing as you head into<br />

the more in-depth breakout sessions.<br />

We Let You Create the Program that Best<br />

Meets Your Needs – You Choose from More<br />

than 30 Sessions<br />

Everyone comes with differing educational needs. That’s why<br />

we’ve created a conference that lets you choose the sessions<br />

most relevant and important to you. From start to finish, your<br />

custom-tailored Institute schedule promises to be jam-packed<br />

with topics you care about.<br />

With so many sessions to choose from, we help guide you<br />

to relevant programming by labeling tracks such as “Patent,”<br />

“Trademark/Copyright,” “In-House Counsel,” “The Business of<br />

IP,” and “Litigation.” But you’re the boss – feel free to select<br />

sessions from any track at the Institute. For instance, maybe you<br />

don’t litigate cases, but there’s a “litigation” session that could<br />

prove helpful to your advisory practice. Or, you’re an experienced<br />

trademark practitioner, but find that you’d like to take some<br />

“patent” sessions to expand your knowledge base. Go for it! In<br />

addition, you’ll receive materials from every session – both those<br />

you attend and those you do not – on the CD-ROM that contains<br />

the 250-page Midwest IP Institute 2011 Course Manual and<br />

electronic versions of the 2011, 2010, and 2009 editions of<br />

The IP Book. The CD-Rom is fully searchable and easy to use.<br />

The Conference Will Provide You with New<br />

Tools and New Energy<br />

A worthwhile conference provides you with new information,<br />

new ideas, new resources and new energy to do the tasks you<br />

need to do. We are confident that the Midwest IP Institute will<br />

deliver those benefits to attendees. You will leave the Midwest<br />

IP Institute with additional insights, knowledge and practice tips<br />

that you can use to be an even better practitioner. You also will<br />

leave with one-of-a-kind reference resources to save you time<br />

and research dollars throughout the year.<br />

The New 2011 IP Book – A Quick<br />

and Easy One-Stop Update, Including<br />

Highlighted Practice Tips Throughout<br />

In addition to helpful update sessions, we<br />

provide every attendee with the 13-chapter<br />

2011 edition of The IP Book, a bound<br />

collection of updates on case law in all<br />

major areas of intellectual property law.<br />

Throughout the book, authors have provided<br />

valuable practice tips arising from these new<br />

developments.<br />

Chapter 1. Federal Circuit Year in Re<strong>view</strong> 2010–2011<br />

Chapter 2.<br />

Chapter 3.<br />

Chapter 4.<br />

Chapter 5.<br />

Chapter 6.<br />

Chapter 7.<br />

Chapter 8.<br />

Microsoft v. i4i<br />

Developments in the Law of Patent Remedies<br />

2010–2011<br />

Recent Federal Circuit Decisions Concerning<br />

Correcting Patents through Reissue<br />

Divided Infringement: The Enforceability of<br />

Patents (or Not) in the Age of Multiple Actors<br />

and Outsourced Infringement<br />

False Patent Marking Claims Under<br />

Attack: Heightened Pleading Standards,<br />

Constitutional Challenges, and Legislative<br />

Action<br />

Copyright Highlights: Noteworthy Cases<br />

2010–2011<br />

Critical Trade Secret Developments<br />

2010–2011<br />

Chapter 9. Top Ten Trademark Decisions of 2010–2011<br />

Chapter 10. Top Ten TTAB Decisions of 2010–2011<br />

Chapter 11. Top Ten UDRP Decisions for 2010–2011<br />

Chapter 12.<br />

Chapter 13.<br />

The Year in Keyword Advertising<br />

Social Media: Ten Noteworthy Cases in<br />

2010–2011


Dozens of New Sessions for Prosecutors, Advisors, and Litigators.<br />

We have designed dozens of new sessions for this year’s Institute including:<br />

All Materials Come on a Fully<br />

Searchable CD-Rom<br />

You’ll receive the entire 250-page Midwest<br />

IP Institute Course Manual – plus electronic<br />

versions of the 2011, 2010, and 2009<br />

editions of The IP Book – on a fully<br />

searchable CD-Rom. In addition, at each<br />

session you attend, you’ll receive a set of<br />

materials in hard-copy form so that you can follow<br />

along. It’s the best of both worlds!<br />

And You’ll Enjoy High-Quality<br />

Conference Amenities, a Chance to<br />

Win Great Prizes and a Can’t-Miss<br />

Networking Opportunity!<br />

The Institute includes amenities to make the entire<br />

conference a comfortable, enjoyable affair –<br />

breakfast each morning, snacks and beverages<br />

during breaks, a chance to win one of 3 Apple<br />

iPad2s, a five-star reception with gourmet hors<br />

d’oeuvres and more. It’s a fun and relaxed<br />

conference setting in which to network. You’ll have<br />

plenty of time to visit with friends, clients, potential<br />

clients and other colleagues throughout the two<br />

days.<br />

Sponsoring Firms<br />

• How to Understand the New<br />

Patent Law: Analysis by Chief<br />

Judge Michel<br />

• Top Tips for TTAB Advocacy<br />

Including Insights from the<br />

Chief Judge<br />

• The Power IP Update 2011<br />

• IP Issues in Contracts:<br />

Beyond Ownership and<br />

Infringement<br />

• European Prosecution and<br />

Opposition – “On the Ground”<br />

Insights from Cargill’s Chief<br />

European IP Counsel<br />

• Judge Michel on How to Win<br />

Appeals at the Federal Circuit<br />

and Other Courts of Appeals<br />

• New Developments in IP<br />

Insurance<br />

• Software IP Issues in<br />

Business Acquisitions<br />

• How to Re<strong>view</strong> a Client’s IP<br />

Portfolio<br />

• Measuring Consumer<br />

Confusion through Online<br />

Surveys<br />

• IP and Business Issues in<br />

Cloud Computing<br />

• Inequitable Conduct After<br />

Therasense<br />

• The Intersection of IP and<br />

Employment Law: What IP<br />

Lawyers Need to Know<br />

• Increasing Your Company’s<br />

IP IQ<br />

• The Enforceability of Patents<br />

(or Not) in the Age of<br />

Combined Infringement<br />

• How to Clear and Register<br />

Your First Trademark<br />

• Madrid Protocol Update<br />

• The Role of Consumer<br />

Surveys in Proving Patent<br />

Infringement Damages<br />

• Top 10 Tips for Representing<br />

Copyright Owners<br />

• How to Negotiate and Draft<br />

Indemnification Clauses in IP<br />

Transactions<br />

• Anatomy of an IP License<br />

Agreement<br />

• What Lawyers Need to<br />

Know about Attorney-<br />

Client Privilege in Joint IP<br />

Representations<br />

And many more!


SCHEdULE – Day 1<br />

Morning Plenary Sessions<br />

8:15 – 8:50 a.m. CHECK-IN & CONTINENTAL BREAKFAST<br />

8:50 – 9:00 a.m. WELCOME & INTRODUCTION<br />

Choose your Plenary Sessions<br />

Main Plenaries<br />

9:00 – 9:45 a.m.<br />

How to Understand the New Patent Law:<br />

Analysis by Chief Judge Michel<br />

The evolving content of the 150-page proposed legislation will<br />

impact all IP practitioners. Recent case law developments already<br />

do. But the language of the patent reform bill and recent decisions<br />

of the Supreme Court and the Federal Circuit mask more than they<br />

explain. Hear the former Chief Judge of the Federal Circuit unpack<br />

the complexity and explain how to analyze and apply the new law.<br />

– Chief Judge Paul R. Michel, ret.<br />

9:45 – 10:15 a.m.<br />

Trends at the TTAB: Insights from the Chief Judge<br />

Chief Judge Gerard Rogers discusses:<br />

• USPTO Strategic Plan initiatives for the TTAB<br />

• The TTAB’s commitment to the issuance of precedential<br />

decisions, and to timely revision of the TBMP, to guide and aid<br />

practitioners<br />

• How the Accelerated Case Resolution program is working<br />

• What the TTAB may do to promote settlement discussions<br />

• Trends in trademark issues arising at the TTAB and how the<br />

Board is responding to them<br />

– Chief Judge Gerard F. Rogers<br />

10:15 – 11:00 a.m.<br />

The Power IP Update 2011<br />

The latest and greatest cases in each major area of IP law:<br />

patents, trademarks, trade secrets and copyrights. An essential<br />

case law update for anyone whose practice involves intellectual<br />

property law.<br />

– David J.F. Gross<br />

Alternate Plenaries – “Crash Course”<br />

9:00 – 10:00 a.m.<br />

How to Clear and Register Your First Trademark<br />

Designed for trademark rookies, this session will explain the<br />

importance of searching and clearing trademarks so that you<br />

select a mark that doesn’t infringe on another’s trademark<br />

rights. You’ll learn how to federally register trademarks, why it is<br />

important to do so, and how to respond if your initial application<br />

is refused.<br />

– Sarah A. Lockner<br />

10:00 – 11:00 a.m.<br />

Conversational Patent: 20 Phrases You Need<br />

to Know<br />

Few areas of the law are as complex and jargon-filled as patent<br />

law. This session is geared towards the non-patent lawyer,<br />

both outside and in-house, who needs to speak confidently and<br />

knowledgeably to colleagues, clients and even cocktail party<br />

guests about patent issues. The session will give an over<strong>view</strong> of<br />

the basics of patent prosecution, infringement claims, licensing<br />

and patent concerns in mergers and acquisitions. Attendees<br />

are encouraged to bring their questions and participate in the<br />

discussion.<br />

– Alan M. Koenck, Rita Anne O’Keeffe & Keiko L. Sugisaka<br />

Trademark & Copyright Patent<br />

Business of IP<br />

In-House Counsel<br />

11:15 a.m. – 12:15 p.m.<br />

Breakout Session A<br />

1. The Year in Patent Law at the CAFC and U.S. Supreme<br />

Court<br />

This session focuses on noteworthy recent CAFC and U.S.<br />

Supreme Court patent decisions, moving beyond the basic<br />

holdings to an exploration of how the decisions are really<br />

impacting legal counseling and litigation.<br />

– John A. Dragseth & Kevin H. Rhodes<br />

2. Top Tips for TTAB Advocacy<br />

The Chief Judge of the TTAB and an experienced trademark<br />

lawyer will provide guidance on how to best litigate a case before<br />

the board; including motion practice, how the new procedural<br />

rules are being interpreted, settlement options for litigants, how to<br />

best utilize interlocutory attorneys and more.<br />

– Chief Judge Gerard F. Rogers & Elizabeth C. Buckingham<br />

3. IP Issues in Contracts: Beyond Ownership and<br />

Infringement<br />

Building on last year’s presentation on core IP issues in<br />

commercial contracts, this session will address practical<br />

concerns with other key provisions, such as confidentiality and<br />

non-disclosure, anti-reverse-engineering restrictions and residual<br />

knowledge. This session will focus on crafting and negotiating IP<br />

provisions that reflect the parties’ underlying business objectives,<br />

and provide practical advice on separating the important from<br />

the unimportant when negotiating IP rights under business<br />

agreements.<br />

– Douglas Barnes & Stacy A. Schultz<br />

4. The Intersection of IP and Employment Law: What IP<br />

Lawyers Need to Know<br />

This session will address the overlap in employment and<br />

intellectual property issues, and what IP lawyers should know<br />

about employment law, including: typical employment policies<br />

related to IP rights; drafting employment agreements; navigating<br />

IP disputes involving employee rights and obligations; key case law<br />

relating to the intersection of IP and employment law; and other<br />

trends and developments.<br />

– Jacqueline R. Rolfs & Becky R. Thorson<br />

12:15 – 1:30 p.m. Institute Luncheon – Radisson Plaza Hotel<br />

1:30 – 2:30 p.m.<br />

Breakout Session B<br />

5. How to Win Appeals at the Federal Circuit and Other<br />

Courts of Appeals<br />

The likes and dislikes, the hopes and the horrors, the mindsets and<br />

blind spots of appellate judges all matter, but they cannot be found<br />

in books. Hear an insider perspective from the former Chief Judge of<br />

the Federal Circuit. He can now speak without any restraints. Winning<br />

cannot be guaranteed, of course, but improving the odds can be.<br />

– Chief Judge Paul R. Michel, ret.<br />

6. Measuring Consumer Confusion through Online Surveys<br />

The Internet is used to capture consumer data on a daily basis. This<br />

session discusses the practical and evidentiary issues in measuring<br />

consumer confusion for trademark disputes using the Internet. The<br />

topics will include a discussion of the process to conduct an online<br />

survey and acceptability of online surveys in the courts and trademark<br />

office.<br />

– Hal Poret & William D. Schultz<br />

7. Strategic IP Management: Reality or Myth?<br />

It is popular to assert that intellectual property issues and<br />

portfolios should be managed “strategically.” The issues are:<br />

what does “strategically” mean and what does it accomplish?<br />

In many “strategically managed” portfolios, strategic direction is<br />

lacking as well as the tools indicative of strategy such as overall<br />

budgeting, communication tools for identification of strategy, and<br />

documentation that supports strategy and decision making. The<br />

speakers will examine proven approaches for good management<br />

of IP issues, with a focus on patent portfolio development and<br />

contested (litigation) issue management.<br />

– Randy A. Hillson & Karen D. McDaniel<br />

8. IP and Business Issues in Cloud Computing<br />

Cloud computing represents a paradigm shift in how companies<br />

contract for software and information technology services, but<br />

many of the best practices from traditional models still apply. In this<br />

session, two tech-savvy lawyers explain:<br />

• what cloud computing is<br />

• how companies are using the cloud<br />

• IP issues in the cloud<br />

• concerns about data ownership and data security<br />

• risks to be considered in service provider agreements<br />

– Christopher R. Hilberg & Daniel A. Tysver<br />

11:00 – 11:15 a.m. BREAK


2:45 – 3:45 p.m.<br />

Breakout Session C<br />

9. Inequitable Conduct After Therasense: “Scourge” Eliminated or<br />

Unchanged?<br />

The inequitable conduct defense allows accused patent infringers to render an entire<br />

patent unenforceable where they demonstrate that the patentee acted with the specific<br />

intent to deceive the PTO as to any single claim. This up-side potential has resulted<br />

in the reflexive assertion of the defense. Courts, considering the defense a “scourge”<br />

or “plague,” have created various, and often conflicting, legal standards to limit the<br />

defense’s assertion. With multiple legal standards in play, the U.S. Court of Appeals<br />

for the Federal Circuit released its en banc decision in Therasense Inc. v. Becton,<br />

Dickinson & Co. to tighten the standards for proving inequitable conduct. This session<br />

will re<strong>view</strong> the history of the defense, the applicable standards for materiality and intent,<br />

and the consequences of those standards for patent prosecutors and litigators.<br />

– Felicia J. Boyd & Tim Clise<br />

10. The Year in Trademark Law: Lessons from Ten Cases Involving Fashion,<br />

Food, Liquor and Entertainment<br />

Trademark attorneys Stephen Baird and Paul Mussell analyze the practical implications of<br />

this year’s ten most significant trademark decisions; including Superior Seafoods, Inc. v.<br />

Hanft Fride P.A., Levi Strauss & Company v. Abercrombie & Fitch Trading Company, and<br />

Eva’s Bridal Ltd. v. Halanick Enterprises Inc. This year’s cases reinforce valuable lessons<br />

about likelihood of confusion, assignment of trademark rights, dilution, and trademark<br />

licensing.<br />

– Stephen R. Baird & Paul W. Mussell<br />

4:00 – 5:00 p.m.<br />

Breakout Session D<br />

13. Divided Infringement: The Enforceability of Patents (or<br />

Not) in the Age of Combined Infringement<br />

If multiple actors combine to practice the limitations of a patent<br />

claim, does a patent holder have a remedy against any of them? Is<br />

“divided infringement” infringement at all? A panel of experienced<br />

patent lawyers and litigators discuss the state of the law of<br />

“divided infringement” and the challenges it presents for patent<br />

holders, prosecutors, and litigators.<br />

– Timothy A. Czaja, Jeffrey J. Hohenshell & Terrance C. Newby<br />

– Aaron Myers, moderator<br />

14. The Madrid Protocol: Success, Failure or Somewhere in<br />

Between?<br />

Earlier this year, the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)<br />

announced that international trademark filings under the Madrid<br />

Protocol increased by 12.8% last year. The biggest increases came<br />

from South Korea and China, and U.S. filings were up by 30%. When<br />

the U.S. joined the Madrid Protocol in 2004, many practitioners<br />

touted the benefits of the Madrid system for U.S. clients, while<br />

others advised caution. The reality lies somewhere in between. The<br />

panel will explore what has worked, what hasn’t and what the future<br />

holds.<br />

– Edward R. Courtney, Jay Erstling & Sandy Epp Ryan<br />

– Dean R. Karau, moderator<br />

5:00 – 6:00 p.m.<br />

Five-Star<br />

Reception<br />

Join your colleagues for:<br />

Gourmet hors d’oeuvres<br />

Fine wines<br />

Local beers<br />

Networking in a relaxed setting<br />

A chance to win great prizes!<br />

Register for a<br />

Chance to Win!<br />

11. Anatomy of an IP License Agreement<br />

This session will cover key provisions of intellectual property license agreements, with<br />

a focus on various structures of clauses and options to consider when drafting and<br />

re<strong>view</strong>ing. The discussion will focus on practical issues in drafting and dealing with<br />

license grants, royalties and other consideration, allocating rights and obligations for<br />

prosecution and enforcement, warranties, indemnification, issues presented by joint<br />

development, differences in license issues for different types of intellectual property,<br />

and other key terms.<br />

– Michael T. McCormick<br />

Ethics<br />

15. “No Secrets” or “Keep Secrets”? – What Lawyers<br />

Need to Know about the Viability and Extent<br />

of the Attorney-Client Privilege in Joint IP<br />

Representations<br />

1.0 ethics credit (applied for)<br />

This breakout session will examine the law and the practical<br />

considerations affecting the attorney-client privilege<br />

when lawyers represent multiple clients in IP matters.<br />

The program will also address: (1) the impact of common<br />

interest and joint defense agreements on privileged<br />

communications; and (2) who controls the privilege when<br />

intellectual property is conveyed pursuant to an asset<br />

purchase agreement or a stock purchase agreement.<br />

– David L. Sasseville<br />

Register for a chance to win one of 3<br />

iPad2s! The prize drawing will take<br />

place at the reception on Thursday,<br />

September 22, and you must be<br />

present at the reception during the<br />

prize drawing to win. Any person may<br />

receive an entry slip on Thursday,<br />

September 22, at the Institute<br />

registration desk until the reception begins at 5:00 p.m.<br />

Registration for the 2011 Midwest IP Institute is not<br />

required. The following individuals are not eligible to<br />

win: Institute faculty, planners and IP Book authors;<br />

employees of <strong>Minnesota</strong> <strong>CLE</strong> and the <strong>Minnesota</strong> State<br />

Bar Association, as well as family members of those<br />

employees.<br />

12. Raising Your Company’s IP IQ<br />

Understanding your company’s IP IQ is important, raising it is even more important.<br />

Come hear from a panel of in-house counsel who have done just that. The panelists<br />

will offer practical advice about identifying how management – of both large and<br />

small companies – treats their IP and how to increase their IP acumen. Topics<br />

include maximizing the value of your IP investment, trademarks and branding-related<br />

matters, trade secret protection, enabling innovation, invention submissions, strategic<br />

enforcement and other critical IP issues.<br />

– Hildy Bowbeer, Richard G. Erstad & Harry J. Gwinnell<br />

– Kari J. Wangensteen, moderator<br />

16. Walking in a Wiki Wonderland: What Businesses Can<br />

Learn about Protecting Trade Secrets and Confidential<br />

Information from the WikiLeaks Debacle<br />

We all know about WikiLeaks, now learn what it means for your<br />

business. An expert panel of in-house and outside counsel will<br />

address the threats that the internet, rogue websites, and advancing<br />

technologies pose to confidential information and trade secrets.<br />

Learn about inadvertent disclosure and how to protect against, and<br />

react to, it.<br />

– James Joslin, Randall E. Kahnke, Christopher M. Turoski &<br />

Andrew F. Ubel<br />

Special thanks to our<br />

Sponsoring Firms for<br />

making the reception a<br />

truly five-star aFFair.


SCHEdULE – Day 2<br />

Morning Plenary Sessions<br />

8:30 – 8:50 a.m. Continental Breakfast<br />

8:50 – 9:00 a.m. Welcome & Introduction<br />

Choose your Plenary Sessions<br />

MAIN PLENARIES<br />

9:00 – 9:45 a.m.<br />

IP in Europe: A Greek Drama in Many, Many<br />

Episodes<br />

Europe has an ambivalent attitude vis-à-vis intellectual property.<br />

Even though the benefits of innovation are heralded as essential<br />

to build an economy for the future, there is an inbred feeling that<br />

intellectual property is a necessary evil rather than a sought-after<br />

good. This ambivalence is reflected in the strange exceptions<br />

to patentability that are defined in the EPC, in the heroic battles<br />

that are fought at the European Parliament level with respect to<br />

IP rights on software as well as in the constantly failing attempts<br />

to come to a unitary patent and a unitary patent litigation system.<br />

Some recent decisions with respect to Community Trademarks as<br />

well as some copyright issues will be discussed as well.<br />

– Filip De Corte<br />

9:45 – 10:45 a.m.<br />

Buried Treasure and Other New Developments in<br />

IP Insurance<br />

Business tort claims may implicate coverage under a variety of<br />

policy forms – Commercial General Liability, Umbrella, Excess,<br />

International, Errors & Omissions, Directors & Officers, Kidnap<br />

& Ransom to name but a few. Exclusions which at first glance<br />

appear to bar coverage such as provisions limiting coverage<br />

for intellectual property insurance, such as the Web Xtend<br />

Endorsement from Travelers, or the intellectual property exclusion<br />

from Chubb or St. Paul, might not have the restrictive impact the<br />

insurer anticipates where the insurer fails to properly inform its<br />

insured of the impact of the proposed restrictions on existent<br />

coverage.<br />

– David A. Gauntlett<br />

ALTERNATE PLENARIES – “Crash Course”<br />

9:00 – 9:45 a.m.<br />

Top 10 Tips for Representing Copyright Owners<br />

Copyright protection applies to many types of creative works,<br />

so you may receive copyright-related questions from clients<br />

representing diverse industries. In this fast-paced session, you’ll<br />

learn the benefits of registering a copyright and how to do it, how<br />

to enforce copyrights against infringers, and how to respond to<br />

client questions about copyright law; including the limits of the fair<br />

use doctrine.<br />

– Ruth Rivard<br />

9:45 – 10:45 a.m.<br />

How to Re<strong>view</strong> a Client’s IP Portfolio<br />

Have you checked your IP lately? Companies often start<br />

businesses with a business plan, strategies and the ability to do<br />

something well, but few companies begin with the strategy of<br />

securing their IP. Instead, the IP exists in the company and might<br />

not be protected well or at all. This session provides practical<br />

guidance on where to begin with the client to help them gain an<br />

understanding of what it has and how to confirm it is secured.<br />

– Tricia A. Olson<br />

10:45 – 11:00 a.m. Break<br />

Trademark & Copyright Patent<br />

In-House Counsel<br />

Litigation<br />

11:00 a.m. – 12:00 p.m.<br />

Breakout Session E<br />

17. A Closer Look at Reexamination in 2011 and Beyond<br />

Tim Bianchi surveys three hot topics in patent reexam:<br />

• Best practices for drafting and prosecuting patent applications<br />

to survive reexam<br />

• Lessons from some of the larger reexamination campaigns of<br />

how reexams are being used in parallel litigation<br />

• Update on how patent law reform may impact reexam<br />

– Timothy E. Bianchi<br />

18. Copyright and Content Licensing: What’s New and<br />

What Must We Know to Advise Our Clients<br />

To paraphrase Justice Holmes, “The life of copyright has not been<br />

logic; it has been experience and responses to technological<br />

advancements and new market opportunities.” Our clients’<br />

methods for capturing, delivering and making money from using<br />

content are expanding and evolving, and Congress and the<br />

courts are reacting to those changes with new laws and novel<br />

interpretations. This session will provide an update on recent<br />

cases involving the licensing of content, an analysis of the key<br />

provisions of a Content License Agreement, and a re<strong>view</strong> of some<br />

of the latest licensing strategies.<br />

– Gregory C. Brown<br />

19. Software IP Issues in Business Acquisitions<br />

This session looks at software-related assets as a form of IP that<br />

needs buyer and seller attention in business acquisitions. Sellerowned<br />

software may have ownership issues, and underlying IP<br />

supporting exclusivity may have any of the validity, freedom-to-use<br />

or other value-affecting frailties present with other IP. Licensed-in<br />

software can raise many contractual issues from under-licensing<br />

of users, to troubling risk allocation in the license, to a mismatch<br />

between the license terms and the way the software is or will<br />

be used post-acquisition. Issues relating to license assignability<br />

and open source may also be present. Deal attorneys looking at<br />

software IP issues may also be drawn into IT issues, e.g., absence<br />

of viruses, presence of disaster recovery plans, adequate security<br />

procedures, and software quality assurances.<br />

– Stuart R. Hemphill & Apur R. Patel<br />

20. Navigating the Waters of IP Settlements: Bringing Your<br />

Case to Dock<br />

Our expert panel will discuss current trends and strategies in IP<br />

settlements. This is a “must attend” for both outside and in-house<br />

counsel seeking practical, creative and cutting-edge ways to<br />

achieve cost effective, business oriented resolutions to their most<br />

troublesome IP cases in today’s legal/business climate.<br />

– Hildy Bowbeer, Richard G. Morgan &<br />

Hon. James M. Rosenbaum (Ret., D. Minn.)<br />

– Michael M. Lafeber, moderator<br />

12:00 – 1:15 p.m. Lunch – on your own<br />

1:15 – 2:15 p.m.<br />

Breakout Session F<br />

21. European Prosecution and Opposition: An Exercise in<br />

Hyper-textualism<br />

The European case law with respect to sufficiency of disclosure<br />

(Article 83 EPC) and added-matter (Article 123(2) EPC) are becoming<br />

important stumbling blocks for patents to be granted but even more<br />

so, these articles are developing into lethal weapons in opposition.<br />

Recent case law will be re<strong>view</strong>ed and some practical guidance will be<br />

given on how to deal with these two articles with special attention for<br />

US originating applications.<br />

– Filip De Corte<br />

22. Copyright Year in Re<strong>view</strong> – Constitutional Issues, The<br />

Righthaven Saga, Bratz and More<br />

Copyright law experts discuss the practical implications of recent<br />

important copyright developments, including the decisions in Sony<br />

BMG v. Tenenbaum, Golan v. Holder, Gaylord v. United States, and<br />

MGA Entertainment, Inc. v. Mattel, Inc.<br />

– Donna H. Gies & Calvin L. Litsey<br />

23. How to Negotiate and Draft Indemnification Clauses in IP<br />

Transactions<br />

A number of issues arise where the payor is an insurer or indemnitor.<br />

Who will control counsel? Will conflicts of interest permit the<br />

insured/indemnitee to retain counsel at the insurer’s expense? If<br />

indemnification is owed, does it create a duty to reimburse the<br />

defense fees after a specific self-insured retention threshold is<br />

exceeded? Or is there a duty to both defend and indemnify where<br />

selection of counsel may be controlled by the indemnitor? Is there<br />

a provision requiring that the counsel be subject to the approval<br />

of the indemnitee? If these issues are not addressed can they be<br />

negotiated? Before resolving insurance coverage indemnification<br />

disputes, is it best to await resolution of the underlying litigation so<br />

that the existence of the indemnity relationship and factual disputes<br />

as to its applicability do not negatively affect that litigation?<br />

– David A. Gauntlett<br />

24. The Role of Consumer Surveys in Proving Patent<br />

Infringement Damages<br />

Recent Federal Circuit decisions have emphasized how consumer<br />

perceptions and behavior impact damages in patent infringement<br />

cases. This session will present a practical approach to effectively<br />

using consumer surveys in patent cases. Topics will include the<br />

selection of experts, how to avoid common pitfalls when developing<br />

survey evidence, and the effective presentation of survey evidence<br />

at trial.<br />

– Christopher K. Larus & Andrew D. Sorensen


2:30 – 3:30 p.m.<br />

Breakout Session G<br />

25. Patent Reform Update: What It Means to<br />

Practicing Patent Lawyers<br />

If patent reform is enacted before the Institute, this<br />

session will focus on the real-world implications<br />

for patent practice; including new post-issuance<br />

proceedings, options for meaningful third-party<br />

submissions, and changes to Section 102. If patent<br />

reform is still pending, this session will focus on the<br />

likelihood of its eventual passage, intermediate steps<br />

the Congress may take to implement reforms and<br />

best practices for patent prosecution in either event.<br />

– Brad D. Pedersen<br />

Elimination of Bias<br />

26. “GQ” and the IP Lawyer: What’s<br />

Gender Got to Do with It?<br />

1.0 elimination of bias credit (applied for)<br />

In this interactive workshop, seasoned<br />

attorney and executive coach Kathleen Marron<br />

presents a model for understanding the<br />

spectrum of key gender differences in how<br />

lawyers (and inventors) communicate, lead,<br />

and negotiate. She applies this model to real<br />

experiences from IP litigation, and includes<br />

current research on the science of implicit<br />

bias and gender brain-based neurological<br />

and behavioral differences. In this humorous<br />

and content-rich workshop, attendees will<br />

learn a process for increasing their gender<br />

intelligence (or “GQ”) about the strengths that<br />

both genders’ styles bring to IP practice.<br />

– Kathleen A. Marron<br />

27. Domain Names & Trademarks: UDRP<br />

Fundamentals in the Context of Real-World<br />

Cases<br />

As the number of registered Internet domain names<br />

continues to grow exponentially, and with the value of<br />

some domains reaching the hundreds of thousands to<br />

millions of dollars, domain name issues are becoming<br />

increasingly central to trademark disputes. This<br />

session discusses the rules, procedures, and practical<br />

considerations governing trademark disputes relating<br />

to Internet domain names, in particular how to mount<br />

and defend actions under the Uniform Domain Name<br />

Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP). This session will<br />

center on real-world UDRP cases and will also touch<br />

upon some of the upcoming changes to the Internet<br />

domain name system.<br />

– Christopher R. Smith & Garrett M. Weber<br />

FACULTY & PLANNERS<br />

GUEST<br />

SPEAKER<br />

PLANNER<br />

Stephen R. Baird<br />

Winthrop & Weinstine, P.A.<br />

Minneapolis<br />

Douglas Barnes<br />

Gibson Dunn<br />

New York City, New York<br />

Timothy E. Bianchi<br />

Schwegman Lundberg &<br />

Woessner, P.A.<br />

Minneapolis<br />

Hildy Bowbeer<br />

3M Innovative Properties<br />

Company<br />

Saint Paul<br />

Felicia J. Boyd<br />

Barnes Thornburg, LLP<br />

Minneapolis<br />

Gregory C. Brown<br />

Office of General Counsel<br />

University of <strong>Minnesota</strong><br />

Minneapolis<br />

Elizabeth C. Buckingham<br />

Dorsey & Whitney LLP<br />

Minneapolis<br />

Caldwell Camero<br />

Best Buy Co., Inc.<br />

Richfield<br />

Tim Clise<br />

Clise, Billion & Cyr, P.A.<br />

Minneapolis<br />

Edward R. Courtney<br />

Ecolab, Inc.<br />

Saint Paul<br />

Timothy A. Czaja<br />

Dicke, Billig & Czaja, PLLC<br />

Minneapolis<br />

Filip De Corte<br />

Cargill<br />

Brussels, Belgium<br />

John A. Dragseth<br />

Fish & Richardson, P.C.<br />

Minneapolis<br />

Richard G. Erstad<br />

Hawkins, Inc.<br />

Minneapolis<br />

Jay Erstling<br />

William Mitchell College of Law<br />

Saint Paul<br />

Frank S. Farrell<br />

F.S. Farrell, LLC<br />

Edina<br />

David A. Gauntlett<br />

Gauntlett & Associates<br />

Irvine, California<br />

Donna H. Gies<br />

Thomson Reuters<br />

Eagan<br />

David J.F. Gross<br />

Faegre & Benson, LLP<br />

Minneapolis<br />

Harry J. Gwinnell<br />

Greenblum & Bernstein, P.L.C.<br />

Reston, Virginia<br />

Stuart R. Hemphill<br />

Dorsey & Whitney LLP<br />

Minneapolis<br />

Christopher R. Hilberg<br />

Best Buy Co., Inc.<br />

Richfield<br />

Randy A. Hillson<br />

Merchant & Gould, P.C.<br />

Minneapolis<br />

Jeffrey J. Hohenshell<br />

Medtronic, Inc.<br />

Brooklyn Park<br />

James Joslin<br />

Honeywell Inc.<br />

Golden Valley<br />

Randall E. Kahnke<br />

Faegre & Benson, LLP<br />

Minneapolis<br />

Dean R. Karau<br />

Fredrikson & Byron, P.A.<br />

Minneapolis<br />

Timothy M. Kenny<br />

Fulbright & Jaworski LLP<br />

Minneapolis<br />

Alan M. Koenck<br />

Kinney & Lange, P.A.<br />

Minneapolis<br />

Michael M. Lafeber<br />

Briggs and Morgan, P.A.<br />

Minneapolis<br />

Christopher K. Larus<br />

Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi, L.L.P.<br />

Minneapolis<br />

Calvin L. Litsey<br />

Faegre & Benson, LLP<br />

Minneapolis<br />

Sarah A. Lockner<br />

3M Innovative Properties Company<br />

Saint Paul<br />

Michael T. McCormick<br />

Dorsey & Whitney LLP<br />

Minneapolis<br />

Karen D. McDaniel<br />

Merchant & Gould, P.C.<br />

Minneapolis<br />

Kathleen A. Marron<br />

The Marron Alliance<br />

Golden Valley<br />

Todd Messal<br />

Boston Scientific Corporation<br />

Maple Grove<br />

Hon. Paul R. Michel<br />

(ret., CAFC)<br />

Chevy Chase, Maryland<br />

Richard G. Morgan<br />

Bowman and Brooke LLP<br />

Minneapolis<br />

Paul W. Mussell<br />

Wells Fargo<br />

Minneapolis<br />

Aaron Myers<br />

Barnes Thornburg, LLP<br />

Minneapolis<br />

Adonis A. Neblett<br />

Fredrikson & Byron, P.A.<br />

Minneapolis<br />

Terrance C. Newby<br />

Leffert Jay & Polglaze, P.A.<br />

Minneapolis<br />

Rita Anne O’Keeffe<br />

bluestem brands, inc.<br />

Eden Prairie<br />

Tricia A. Olson<br />

Olson IP & Business Consulting<br />

Minnetonka<br />

Thomas J. Oppold<br />

Larkin, Hoffman, Daly &<br />

Lindgren, Ltd.<br />

Minneapolis<br />

Devan V. Padmanabhan<br />

Dorsey & Whitney LLP<br />

Minneapolis<br />

Apur R. Patel<br />

UnitedHealth Group<br />

Minnetonka<br />

Brad D. Pedersen<br />

Patterson Thuente Christensen<br />

Pedersen, P.A.<br />

Minneapolis<br />

Hal Poret<br />

ORC International<br />

New York City, New York<br />

Kevin H. Rhodes<br />

3M Innovative Properties<br />

Company<br />

Saint Paul<br />

Ruth Rivard<br />

Leonard, Street and Deinard<br />

Minneapolis<br />

Hon. Gerard F. Rogers<br />

Trademark Trial and<br />

Appeal Board<br />

Alexandria, Virginia<br />

Jacqueline R. Rolfs<br />

Honeywell Inc.<br />

Golden Valley<br />

Hon. James M. Rosenbaum<br />

(Ret., D. Minn.)<br />

JAMS<br />

Minneapolis<br />

Sandy Epp Ryan<br />

Faegre & Benson LLP<br />

Minneapolis<br />

David L. Sasseville<br />

Lindquist & Vennum PLLP<br />

Minneapolis<br />

Stacy A. Schultz<br />

UnitedHealth Group<br />

Minnetonka<br />

William D. Schultz<br />

Merchant & Gould, P.C.<br />

Minneapolis<br />

Christopher R. Smith<br />

Lindquist & Vennum PLLP<br />

Minneapolis<br />

Andrew D. Sorensen<br />

Ecolab, Inc.<br />

Saint Paul<br />

Keiko L. Sugisaka<br />

Maslon Edelman Borman &<br />

Brand, LLP<br />

Minneapolis<br />

Becky R. Thorson<br />

Robins, Kaplan, Miller &<br />

Ciresi, L.L.P.<br />

Minneapolis<br />

Christopher M. Turoski<br />

Cargill, Incorporated<br />

Minneapolis<br />

Daniel A. Tysver<br />

Beck & Tysver<br />

Minneapolis<br />

Andrew F. Ubel<br />

Valspar Corp.<br />

Minneapolis<br />

Edna Vassilovski<br />

Attorney at Law<br />

Minneapolis<br />

Kari J. Wangensteen<br />

Best Buy Co., Inc.<br />

Richfield<br />

Garrett Weber<br />

Lindquist & Vennum PLLP<br />

Minneapolis<br />

Barbara A. Wrigley<br />

Oppenheimer Wolff &<br />

Donnelly LLP<br />

Minneapolis


The 2011 Midwest<br />

Intellectual Property Institute<br />

September 22 & 23, 2011 • <strong>Minnesota</strong> <strong>CLE</strong> Conference Center • Minneapolis, <strong>Minnesota</strong><br />

<strong>Minnesota</strong> Continuing<br />

State Bar Legal Education<br />

Association<br />

2550 UNIVERSITY AVE W #160-S, SAINT PAUL MN 55114<br />

Nonprofit Org.<br />

U.S. Postage<br />

P A I D<br />

<strong>Minnesota</strong> Continuing<br />

Legal Education<br />

Please “” appropriate box:<br />

$645 MSBA member<br />

$645 paralegal<br />

$645 patent agent<br />

$745 standard rate<br />

I have a <strong>Minnesota</strong> <strong>CLE</strong><br />

Season Pass SM .<br />

Pass #<br />

NEW LAWYER<br />

DISCOUNT!<br />

I was first admitted to the<br />

bar after 9/22/08 and have<br />

deducted $60 from the<br />

fee marked at left.<br />

CHOOSE SESSIONS (one per session):<br />

day 1 – Plenary<br />

Main Plenary<br />

Alternate Plenary<br />

DAY 1 – Breakout sessions<br />

A: #1 #2 #3 #4<br />

b: #5 #6 #7 #8<br />

C: #9 #10 #11 #12<br />

d: #13 #14 #15 #16<br />

dated MATERIAL — PLEASE EXPEDITE!<br />

Please “” one of the following:<br />

In-house counsel Trademark/Copyright attorney<br />

Patent attorney<br />

Business professional<br />

Litigator<br />

Other<br />

DAY 2 – Plenary<br />

Main Plenary<br />

Alternate Plenary<br />

DAY 2 – Breakout sessions<br />

e: #17 #18 #19 #20<br />

f: #21 #22 #23 #24<br />

g: #25 #26 #27<br />

Don’t miss the<br />

Name (first)<br />

Firm<br />

Address<br />

City/State/Zip<br />

Phone<br />

Fax<br />

E-mail<br />

Check here if you have already registered.<br />

Check here if address below is new.<br />

(last)<br />

Atty. License No. (if applicable)<br />

Enclosed is $ by:<br />

Check (payable to <strong>Minnesota</strong> <strong>CLE</strong>)<br />

VISA MasterCard Discover AmEx<br />

Card No.<br />

Expiration<br />

Signature<br />

(mi)<br />

PROGRAM MATERIALS:<br />

I cannot attend. Please send me:<br />

Can’t<br />

Attend?<br />

set(s) of the Institute Manual and the<br />

2011 IP Book – in HARDCOPY – for<br />

$175 per set.<br />

set(s) of the Institute Manual and the<br />

2011 IP Book – on CD-ROM – for<br />

$175 per set.<br />

Items available after September 30, 2011.<br />

Cost of item(s)...........................$<br />

Shipping/Handling.....................$<br />

Subtotal.....................................$<br />

Tax on subtotal..........................$<br />

TOTAL.......................................$<br />

COST OF ITEM(S)<br />

s & H<br />

Single CD-ROM ................................................ $4<br />

$75.01 – 100 .................................................... $8<br />

$100.01 – 150 ................................................... $9<br />

$150.01 – 250 ................................................. $12<br />

$250.01+ ....................................................... $15<br />

Expedited shipping available.<br />

TAX ON SUBTOTAL<br />

Pick the appropriate tax based on where the<br />

book is received.<br />

Minneapolis, MN...................................... 7.775%<br />

Saint Paul, MN.......................................... 7.625%<br />

Hennepin Co. (outside Mpls.).................. 7.275%<br />

Ramsey Co. (outside St. Paul).................. 7.125%<br />

Anoka, Dakota or Washington Co. .......... 7.125%<br />

All other MN............................................. 6.875%<br />

Outside MN.............................................. exempt<br />

[298-12 / tmm / lmp]<br />

Midwest IP Institute –<br />

Register Today!<br />

Credits<br />

<strong>Minnesota</strong> <strong>CLE</strong> will apply to the <strong>Minnesota</strong> State Board of<br />

Continuing Legal Education for 10.75 standard <strong>CLE</strong> credits.<br />

This total includes 1.0 ethics credit for breakout session #15<br />

and 1.0 elimination of bias credit for breakout session<br />

#26. If you attend these sessions and claim the ethics and<br />

elimination of bias credits, you must deduct the special<br />

credits from the 10.75 hours of standard credit. For example,<br />

if you attend both session #15 and #26, you would claim 8.75<br />

standard credits, 1.0 ethics credit and 1.0 elimination of bias<br />

credit. The maximum number of total credits that attendees<br />

may report for this seminar is 10.75 credits. <strong>Minnesota</strong> <strong>CLE</strong> is<br />

an accredited sponsor in Wisconsin and North Dakota.<br />

ACCOMMODATION<br />

If you have a disability and need an accommodation in order<br />

to attend, please contact us in advance of the program at<br />

<strong>Minnesota</strong> <strong>CLE</strong>, 2550 University Avenue West, Suite 160-S,<br />

Saint Paul, MN 55114 or call 651-227-8266 or 800-759-8840.<br />

CANCELLATION / NO-SHOW POLICY<br />

Paid registrants who cancel their registration at least 72 hours<br />

before the program will receive a full credit on their account;<br />

if fewer than 72 hours, a $25 administrative fee will be<br />

deducted. Paid registrants who fail to attend will receive the<br />

written materials. Passholders may purchase the materials at<br />

50% of the full retail price.<br />

HOTEL ACCOMMODATIONS<br />

• Radisson Plaza<br />

35 South Seventh Street<br />

612-339-4900<br />

• Crowne Plaza Northstar Hotel<br />

618 Second Avenue South<br />

612-338-2288<br />

• Marriott City Center Hotel<br />

30 South Seventh Street<br />

612-349-4042<br />

<strong>Minnesota</strong> <strong>CLE</strong> Conference Center<br />

• Marquette Hotel<br />

710 Marquette Avenue<br />

612-333-4545<br />

• The Westin<br />

88 South Sixth Street<br />

612-333-4006<br />

• Graves 601 Hotel<br />

601 First Avenue North<br />

612-677-1100<br />

QUESTIONS?<br />

MAIL REGISTRATION FORM TO:<br />

<strong>Minnesota</strong> <strong>CLE</strong><br />

2550 University Ave. W. #160-S<br />

Saint Paul, MN 55114<br />

FAX TO:<br />

651-227-6262<br />

go online:<br />

www.minncle.org<br />

OR CALL:<br />

651-227-8266 or<br />

800-759-8840<br />

Please call <strong>Minnesota</strong> <strong>CLE</strong> at 651-227-8266 or 800-759-8840.<br />

Or, visit us at www.minncle.org.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!