30.04.2015 Views

Audit-Report-on-NNPC

Audit-Report-on-NNPC

Audit-Report-on-NNPC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Investigative Forensic audit of crude oil revenues and remittances by <strong>NNPC</strong> (January 2012 – July 2013)<br />

4.4.4.2.3. Inclusi<strong>on</strong> of Quarter 4 2011 discharges in the Subsidy claim for the review period<br />

(January 2012 to July 2013) by <strong>NNPC</strong><br />

<br />

During our review of <strong>NNPC</strong>’S supporting documents for the subsidy due between January<br />

2012 and July 2013, we noted the following:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

‣ Inclusi<strong>on</strong> of PMS discharges between October 2011 and December 2011 of<br />

2,066,025,835 litres with a computed subsidy of $1,056,426,431.26 48 .<br />

‣ Inclusi<strong>on</strong> of DPK discharges between October 2011 and December 2011 of<br />

198,080,602.56 litres with a computed subsidy of $198,080,602.56. (Please see<br />

Appendix 6.1.24).<br />

Thus, subsidy amount of $1,254,507,033.82 which relates to PMS and DPK discharges<br />

between October 2011 and December 2011, were included in the explanati<strong>on</strong>s of PPMC as <strong>on</strong>e<br />

of the reas<strong>on</strong>s for the difference between the revenue realized and remitted into the<br />

Federati<strong>on</strong> Accounts by <strong>NNPC</strong> between January 2012 and July 2013. This was however stated<br />

by the Rec<strong>on</strong>ciliati<strong>on</strong> Committee as $1.2 billi<strong>on</strong>.<br />

Per our discussi<strong>on</strong> with <strong>NNPC</strong>, we understood subsidy is inherent in the process of<br />

transforming the crude oil lifted through Swap and OPA into finished petroleum products 49 .<br />

Thus, the subsidy claim of Quarter 4, 2011 would have related to crude oil lifting of 2011 and<br />

should not have been added to the subsidy claim between January 2012 and July 2013.<br />

4.4.4.2.4. Summary<br />

Table D3 below is a summary of our comparis<strong>on</strong> of the subsidy computati<strong>on</strong> per the Rec<strong>on</strong>ciliati<strong>on</strong><br />

Committee <str<strong>on</strong>g>Report</str<strong>on</strong>g> and our reviews:<br />

Descripti<strong>on</strong><br />

Quarter 4, 2011 PMS &<br />

DPK Discharges<br />

PMS Import and<br />

producti<strong>on</strong> between Jan<br />

2012 and Jul 2013<br />

DPK Import and<br />

producti<strong>on</strong> between Jan<br />

2012 and July 2013<br />

Rec. Committee<br />

$’Billi<strong>on</strong><br />

Our Review<br />

$’Billi<strong>on</strong><br />

Difference<br />

$’Billi<strong>on</strong><br />

1.2 Nil (1.20)<br />

5.25 5.38 0.13<br />

Vanguardngr<br />

3.52 3.61 0.09<br />

9.97 8.99 (0.98)<br />

Table D3: Comparis<strong>on</strong> of the Rec<strong>on</strong>ciliati<strong>on</strong> Committee and 0ur Computati<strong>on</strong> (January 20120 – July 2013). Source:<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Report</str<strong>on</strong>g> of the Rec<strong>on</strong>ciliati<strong>on</strong> Committee; PPPRA records of verified import; PwC Analysis<br />

48<br />

Appendix 6.1.24 - Quarter 4, 2011 Discharges included in the <str<strong>on</strong>g>Report</str<strong>on</strong>g> of the Senate Committee <strong>on</strong> Finance <strong>on</strong> the<br />

Investigati<strong>on</strong> of the Alleged Unremitted $49.8 Billi<strong>on</strong> Oil Revenue by <strong>NNPC</strong><br />

49<br />

Secti<strong>on</strong> 3.3.3 Domestic crude oil and revenue flow<br />

C<strong>on</strong>fidential informati<strong>on</strong> for the sole benefit and use of the <str<strong>on</strong>g>Audit</str<strong>on</strong>g>or-General for the Federati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

PwC 70

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!