30.04.2015 Views

Audit-Report-on-NNPC

Audit-Report-on-NNPC

Audit-Report-on-NNPC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Investigative Forensic audit of crude oil revenues and remittances by <strong>NNPC</strong> (January 2012 – July 2013)<br />

4.1.6. Other findings<br />

4.1.6.1. Data collati<strong>on</strong> and single point accountability<br />

The data gathered by the various Agencies and sub-units are kept within the custody of the respective<br />

Agencies/SBUs. There is no single reliable data repository that can provide a holistic overview of the<br />

crude oil sales process from end to end. As such, variances in the records which would flag issues may<br />

be missed. Also, the opportunity to take informed decisi<strong>on</strong>s based <strong>on</strong> robust underlying data is<br />

limited.<br />

We observed that the same data obtained from different sources c<strong>on</strong>tained discrepancies which had<br />

not been rec<strong>on</strong>ciled as at the time of this review. An example would be the details of all crude oil<br />

cargoes lifted; informati<strong>on</strong> from the DPR, Pre-shipment Inspecti<strong>on</strong> Agencies and the <strong>NNPC</strong> COMD<br />

had not been rec<strong>on</strong>ciled as at the time of review.<br />

More so, the various Agencies and sub-units administering the crude oil sales process work in silos<br />

and there is no single point accountability. This is characterized by record duplicati<strong>on</strong>s, rec<strong>on</strong>ciling<br />

items, opacity regarding the activities of certain Agencies/SBUs and inefficiencies.<br />

Rec<strong>on</strong>ciliati<strong>on</strong> was particularly challenging as we needed an independent source to verify the lifting<br />

records provided by COMD. The data obtained from DPR and the PIAs were incomplete, duplicated<br />

or difficult to interpret.<br />

The reports generated by the Agencies/SBUs have different formats and classificati<strong>on</strong>s which creates<br />

difficulties in comparis<strong>on</strong> of similar data sets from different Agencies/SBUs. For example, the export<br />

data as captured by the PIAs and DPR does not break down the crude oil exports per category like Tax<br />

Oil, Royalty oil, Export crude etc.<br />

4.1.6.2. <strong>NNPC</strong> business model<br />

The current <strong>NNPC</strong> business model in relati<strong>on</strong> to the usage of the domestic crude is inadequate as can<br />

be seen from the foregoing. The business model that informed the creati<strong>on</strong> of <strong>NNPC</strong> is a subsidy<br />

minded model. This model is resp<strong>on</strong>sible for several of the weaknesses and lapses that have already<br />

been outlined and the net effect is an erosi<strong>on</strong> of value to the Federati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

Furthermore, the accounting and rec<strong>on</strong>ciliati<strong>on</strong> system for crude oil revenues used by all Government<br />

agencies appears to be inaccurate and weak. We noted significant discrepancies in data from different<br />

sources. The lack of independent audit and rec<strong>on</strong>ciliati<strong>on</strong> led to over reliance <strong>on</strong> data produced from<br />

<strong>NNPC</strong> which may not necessarily be accurate. This matter is further compounded by the lack of<br />

independence within <strong>NNPC</strong> as the business has c<strong>on</strong>flicting interests of being a stand-al<strong>on</strong>e selffunding<br />

entity and also the main source of revenue to the Federati<strong>on</strong> account.<br />

Vanguardngr<br />

C<strong>on</strong>fidential informati<strong>on</strong> for the sole benefit and use of the <str<strong>on</strong>g>Audit</str<strong>on</strong>g>or-General for the Federati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

PwC 51

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!