30.04.2015 Views

Solução_Calculo_Stewart_6e

Solução_Calculo_Stewart_6e

Solução_Calculo_Stewart_6e

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

F.<br />

TX.10<br />

SECTION 3.8 EXPONENTIAL GROWTH AND DECAY ¤ 117<br />

results in 0.05(10W ) − 0.001(10W )W =0 ⇔ 0.5W − 0.01W 2 =0 ⇔ 50W − W 2 =0 ⇔<br />

W (50 − W )=0 ⇔ W =0or 50. SinceC =10W , C =0or 500. Thus, the population pairs (C, W ) that lead to<br />

stable populations are (0, 0) and (500, 50).Soitispossibleforthetwospeciestoliveinharmony.<br />

3.8 Exponential Growth and Decay<br />

1. The relative growth rate is 1 P<br />

dP<br />

dt<br />

Thus, P (6) = 2e 0.7944(6) ≈ 234.99 or about 235 members.<br />

=0.7944,so<br />

dP<br />

dt =0.7944P and, by Theorem 2, P (t) =P (0)e0.7944t =2e 0.7944t .<br />

3. (a) By Theorem 2, P (t) =P (0)e kt = 100e kt . NowP (1) = 100e k(1) = 420 ⇒ e k = 420<br />

100<br />

⇒ k =ln4.2.<br />

So P (t) =100e (ln 4.2)t =100(4.2) t .<br />

(b) P (3) = 100(4.2) 3 =7408.8 ≈ 7409 bacteria<br />

(c) dP/dt = kP ⇒ P 0 (3) = k · P (3) = (ln 4.2) 100(4.2) 3 [from part (a)] ≈ 10,632 bacteria/hour<br />

(d) P (t) = 100(4.2) t =10,000 ⇒ (4.2) t =100 ⇒ t =(ln100)/(ln 4.2) ≈ 3.2 hours<br />

5. (a) Let the population (in millions) in the year t be P (t). Since the initial time is the year 1750, we substitute t − 1750 for t in<br />

Theorem 2, so the exponential model gives P (t) =P (1750)e k(t−1750) .ThenP (1800) = 980 = 790e k(1800−1750)<br />

⇒<br />

980<br />

= 790 ek(50) ⇒ ln 980 =50k ⇒ k = 1 980<br />

ln ≈ 0.0043104. Sowiththismodel,wehave<br />

790 50 790<br />

P (1900) = 790e k(1900−1750) ≈ 1508 million, and P (1950) = 790e k(1950−1750) ≈ 1871 million. Both of these<br />

estimates are much too low.<br />

(b) In this case, the exponential model gives P (t) =P (1850)e k(t−1850) ⇒ P (1900) = 1650 = 1260e k(1900−1850) ⇒<br />

ln 1650 = k(50) ⇒ k = 1 1650<br />

ln ≈ 0.005393. Sowiththismodel,weestimate<br />

1260 50 1260<br />

P (1950) = 1260e k(1950−1850) ≈ 2161 million. This is still too low, but closer than the estimate of P (1950) in part (a).<br />

(c) The exponential model gives P (t) =P (1900)e k(t−1900) ⇒ P (1950) = 2560 = 1650e k(1950−1900) ⇒<br />

ln 2560 = k(50) ⇒ k = 1 2560<br />

1650 50<br />

ln<br />

1650<br />

≈ 0.008785. With this model, we estimate<br />

P (2000) = 1650e k(2000−1900) ≈ 3972 million. This is much too low. The discrepancy is explained by the fact that the<br />

world birth rate (average yearly number of births per person) is about the same as always, whereas the mortality rate<br />

(especially the infant mortality rate) is much lower, owing mostly to advances in medical science and to the wars in the first<br />

part of the twentieth century. The exponential model assumes, among other things, that the birth and mortality rates will<br />

remain constant.<br />

7. (a) If y =[N 2O 5] then by Theorem 2, dy<br />

dt = −0.0005y ⇒ y(t) =y(0)e−0.0005t = Ce −0.0005t .<br />

(b) y(t) =Ce −0.0005t =0.9C ⇒ e −0.0005t =0.9 ⇒ −0.0005t =ln0.9 ⇒ t = −2000 ln 0.9 ≈ 211 s

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!