28.04.2015 Views

WHITE PAPER - Amtech-usa.org

WHITE PAPER - Amtech-usa.org

WHITE PAPER - Amtech-usa.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

see-and-avoid requirement in the FARs. Hence, a system that detects non-participating<br />

traffic is required.<br />

Search Volume<br />

One critically important factor for any SAA system is the search volume defined by<br />

azimuth and elevation. The Convention on International Civil Aviation, Rules of the Air,<br />

establishes the regulatory criterion that differentiates between a converging or<br />

overtaking 9 situation. The critical factor for a SAA system is that it provide surveillance<br />

of all of the airspace that lies within the converging angle: ±110° with respect to the<br />

longitudinal axis of the ROA, although a lesser field of regard may achieve the desired<br />

level of safety. No regulatory guidance for search elevation exists. NASA and DoD<br />

studies have shown that, in head-on scenarios, a search elevation of ±15° with respect to<br />

the flight path provides adequate coverage to detect converging aircraft that are using<br />

climb and descent angles as high as 20° (rare for civilian aircraft and also for military<br />

aircraft operating outside special use airspace). Overtaking scenarios, which are highly<br />

unlikely at controlled airports, may require greater vertical coverage from the onboard<br />

sensors. Further analysis and a review of the ROA’s concept of operations may be<br />

required in order to determine the appropriate sensor coverage required to provide an<br />

ELOS.<br />

Detection Range<br />

The sense-and-avoid system must detect the traffic in time to process the sensor<br />

information, determine if a conflict exists, and execute a maneuver according to the<br />

right-of-way rules. If pilot interaction with the system is required, transmission and<br />

decision time must also be included in the total time between initial detection and the<br />

point of minimum separation. (see Annex 1)<br />

5. Sense-and-Avoid Requirement<br />

a. General. The probability of a ROA colliding with another aircraft must be<br />

comparable to that for manned aircraft (i.e., equivalent level of safety). The measure of<br />

overall system performance shall take into account onboard sensors, beacons,<br />

transponders, air traffic control, concept of operations, and reliability. The SAA system<br />

shall possess the capability to detect both participating and non-participating aircraft day<br />

and night (weather permitting), notify the ROA pilot/operator of the contact, and<br />

determine if a potential collision hazard exists (Threshold). Should the contact<br />

represent a hazard to safe operations, the system shall either provide a suggested conflict<br />

resolution for pilot action or maneuver autonomously to avoid the other aircraft<br />

(Threshold). The SAA system must consider warnings/directions from other avoidance<br />

systems such as traffic collision alert system (TCAS) (Objective). The system shall<br />

provide information to the pilot/operator on the progress of the resolution/avoidance<br />

maneuver, time and conditions permitting (Objective). After conflict resolution, the<br />

system will provide a recommended return-to-course action (Objective).<br />

9 Convention on International Civil Aviation, Annex 2, Rules of the Air, Section 3.2.2.4<br />

8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!