WHITE PAPER - Amtech-usa.org
WHITE PAPER - Amtech-usa.org
WHITE PAPER - Amtech-usa.org
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
see-and-avoid requirement in the FARs. Hence, a system that detects non-participating<br />
traffic is required.<br />
Search Volume<br />
One critically important factor for any SAA system is the search volume defined by<br />
azimuth and elevation. The Convention on International Civil Aviation, Rules of the Air,<br />
establishes the regulatory criterion that differentiates between a converging or<br />
overtaking 9 situation. The critical factor for a SAA system is that it provide surveillance<br />
of all of the airspace that lies within the converging angle: ±110° with respect to the<br />
longitudinal axis of the ROA, although a lesser field of regard may achieve the desired<br />
level of safety. No regulatory guidance for search elevation exists. NASA and DoD<br />
studies have shown that, in head-on scenarios, a search elevation of ±15° with respect to<br />
the flight path provides adequate coverage to detect converging aircraft that are using<br />
climb and descent angles as high as 20° (rare for civilian aircraft and also for military<br />
aircraft operating outside special use airspace). Overtaking scenarios, which are highly<br />
unlikely at controlled airports, may require greater vertical coverage from the onboard<br />
sensors. Further analysis and a review of the ROA’s concept of operations may be<br />
required in order to determine the appropriate sensor coverage required to provide an<br />
ELOS.<br />
Detection Range<br />
The sense-and-avoid system must detect the traffic in time to process the sensor<br />
information, determine if a conflict exists, and execute a maneuver according to the<br />
right-of-way rules. If pilot interaction with the system is required, transmission and<br />
decision time must also be included in the total time between initial detection and the<br />
point of minimum separation. (see Annex 1)<br />
5. Sense-and-Avoid Requirement<br />
a. General. The probability of a ROA colliding with another aircraft must be<br />
comparable to that for manned aircraft (i.e., equivalent level of safety). The measure of<br />
overall system performance shall take into account onboard sensors, beacons,<br />
transponders, air traffic control, concept of operations, and reliability. The SAA system<br />
shall possess the capability to detect both participating and non-participating aircraft day<br />
and night (weather permitting), notify the ROA pilot/operator of the contact, and<br />
determine if a potential collision hazard exists (Threshold). Should the contact<br />
represent a hazard to safe operations, the system shall either provide a suggested conflict<br />
resolution for pilot action or maneuver autonomously to avoid the other aircraft<br />
(Threshold). The SAA system must consider warnings/directions from other avoidance<br />
systems such as traffic collision alert system (TCAS) (Objective). The system shall<br />
provide information to the pilot/operator on the progress of the resolution/avoidance<br />
maneuver, time and conditions permitting (Objective). After conflict resolution, the<br />
system will provide a recommended return-to-course action (Objective).<br />
9 Convention on International Civil Aviation, Annex 2, Rules of the Air, Section 3.2.2.4<br />
8