Madhusudan_Das
Madhusudan_Das
Madhusudan_Das
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
128 <strong>Madhusudan</strong> <strong>Das</strong>:<br />
Governor, but the superimposition of this relation does not relieve<br />
him of his responsibilities to the people and the Legislative<br />
Council which represents the interests of the people... Clause 5<br />
[of Section 124 of the Government of India Act. 1919] prohibits<br />
the receipt of presents but it exempts from such prohibition the<br />
fees paid or payable to barristers. The word 'barrister' is meant to<br />
include other legal practitioners especially vakils practising in<br />
the High Courts... I shall consider my professional practice as a<br />
means of earning of living and if I have to reduce my comforts of<br />
ordinary life. I would not mind it considering that this sacrifice<br />
will be more than amply rewarded by bringing the people in<br />
close touch with the Government. . . A practising lawyer as a<br />
Minister would lend harmony and symmetry to the scheme.<br />
The Governor naturally wrote back to Mr. <strong>Das</strong> on February 11.<br />
1923:<br />
While not in agreement with the agreements which you<br />
urge in justification of such a course [willing to work as a Minister<br />
in an honorary capacity if allowed to earn your living by<br />
practising as a Vakil] I am afraid, there are to my mind serious<br />
practical objections to it. I do not see how in practice you could<br />
combine these duties while doing justice to both or either.<br />
Secondly it appears to me to be an absolute impossibility that a<br />
Minister should appear as a legal practitioner in court subordinate<br />
to the Government of which he is a member. I know of no precedent<br />
for such a position.<br />
Mr. <strong>Das</strong> sent his letter dated February 7/8 1923 and followed it by<br />
his letter of March 8. 1923 in which he said:<br />
As your Excellency rejected my proposal on the subject I do not<br />
think I should continue in this office". The Governor Sir H.<br />
Wheeler in his letter dated March 9. 1923 said:" I have no<br />
alternative but to accept it (letter of resignation.) You say that<br />
you still believe the office to be honorary but as Your Excellency<br />
rejected my proposal on the subject, I do not think I should<br />
continue in this office. I think, however, you will bear me out<br />
that in the actual suggestion made by you, you were 'willing to<br />
work honorary provided you were allowed to earn a living by<br />
practising as a Vakil'.<br />
The Governor subsequently recorded —