28.04.2015 Views

Madhusudan_Das

Madhusudan_Das

Madhusudan_Das

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

128 <strong>Madhusudan</strong> <strong>Das</strong>:<br />

Governor, but the superimposition of this relation does not relieve<br />

him of his responsibilities to the people and the Legislative<br />

Council which represents the interests of the people... Clause 5<br />

[of Section 124 of the Government of India Act. 1919] prohibits<br />

the receipt of presents but it exempts from such prohibition the<br />

fees paid or payable to barristers. The word 'barrister' is meant to<br />

include other legal practitioners especially vakils practising in<br />

the High Courts... I shall consider my professional practice as a<br />

means of earning of living and if I have to reduce my comforts of<br />

ordinary life. I would not mind it considering that this sacrifice<br />

will be more than amply rewarded by bringing the people in<br />

close touch with the Government. . . A practising lawyer as a<br />

Minister would lend harmony and symmetry to the scheme.<br />

The Governor naturally wrote back to Mr. <strong>Das</strong> on February 11.<br />

1923:<br />

While not in agreement with the agreements which you<br />

urge in justification of such a course [willing to work as a Minister<br />

in an honorary capacity if allowed to earn your living by<br />

practising as a Vakil] I am afraid, there are to my mind serious<br />

practical objections to it. I do not see how in practice you could<br />

combine these duties while doing justice to both or either.<br />

Secondly it appears to me to be an absolute impossibility that a<br />

Minister should appear as a legal practitioner in court subordinate<br />

to the Government of which he is a member. I know of no precedent<br />

for such a position.<br />

Mr. <strong>Das</strong> sent his letter dated February 7/8 1923 and followed it by<br />

his letter of March 8. 1923 in which he said:<br />

As your Excellency rejected my proposal on the subject I do not<br />

think I should continue in this office". The Governor Sir H.<br />

Wheeler in his letter dated March 9. 1923 said:" I have no<br />

alternative but to accept it (letter of resignation.) You say that<br />

you still believe the office to be honorary but as Your Excellency<br />

rejected my proposal on the subject, I do not think I should<br />

continue in this office. I think, however, you will bear me out<br />

that in the actual suggestion made by you, you were 'willing to<br />

work honorary provided you were allowed to earn a living by<br />

practising as a Vakil'.<br />

The Governor subsequently recorded —

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!