28.04.2015 Views

Buddhist-Meditation-Systematic-and-Practical

Buddhist-Meditation-Systematic-and-Practical

Buddhist-Meditation-Systematic-and-Practical

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

oken.<br />

Let us take another example, this time from the<br />

Mahayana. In the bodhisattva silas, it says: "Neither<br />

hurt your enemies nor love your friends." But the yogi<br />

practicing the third initiation is bound to love his friends<br />

(the dakinis). How is it, then, that he does not break this<br />

Mahayana precept? In the yogi's meditation, love has<br />

already been identified with sunyata <strong>and</strong> is therefore not<br />

common, human love. As his love is not selfish or<br />

human, the precept is not broken.<br />

On the other h<strong>and</strong>, common persons who try to practice<br />

vajra-love lack the absolutely essential basis of<br />

sunyata-realization. They have never tried practicing the<br />

three wheels of sunyata (see Ch. X, Part One, D, 3, b):<br />

Their application here would be to thoroughly<br />

underst<strong>and</strong> the voidness of the yogi, the voidness of the<br />

dakini, <strong>and</strong> the void-nature of the whole vajra-love<br />

process. Because they have not understood these aspects<br />

of voidness, they are called "common persons." Because<br />

they are common persons, they are still full of lust.<br />

Because they are still full of lust, they break this precept<br />

by having selfish love for friends.<br />

In my book every precept on the subject is examined<br />

thus. Having seen apparent contradictions between the<br />

Vajrayana spirit <strong>and</strong> the words of precepts in the two<br />

lower yanas, we now examine a case where two Tantric<br />

precepts appear to clash.<br />

496

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!