Buddhist-Meditation-Systematic-and-Practical

Buddhist-Meditation-Systematic-and-Practical Buddhist-Meditation-Systematic-and-Practical

pacificbuddha
from pacificbuddha More from this publisher
28.04.2015 Views

Nagarjuna read the Avatamsaka Sutra and by this was converted to the Mahayana. This great sutra he brought back with him to the human world. If all the sutras of the Great Way were composed without the grace of the Buddha, why then did Nagarjuna not establish his own religion as he first intended? Not only have the great teachers of the past discovered the Buddha's Teachings, I myself was asked by a divine voice during my meditation, "You should repeat the Sutra of the Dragon-king Buddha." This discourse I had never seen separately printed and had not taken any care to study, although I had read the Tripitaka four times. I took out this sutra and studied it, finding therein many excellent doctrines and holy instructions. In this work, the Venerable Sariputra, the first in wisdom among the disciples and present at the deep teachings of sunyata in the Heart Sutra, followed the Buddha to his preaching in the naga palace. Listening, he realized that he had never heard such an excellent discourse in the human world. Then he asked the Buddha why he had not preached this highest truth among human beings. The Buddha then warned him not to look down upon or dislike the state of dragons. He said that there were many Bodhisattvas, bhiksus, and upasakas there who, through the commission of a little evil, fell into this watery realm. The nagas being to some extent prepared, the Buddha was able to leave with them many more doctrines than 168

could be taught in the world of men. Furthermore, we should not forget that the Buddha foretold the coming of Nagarjuna in the Lankavatara Sutra, saying that after eight hundred years have passed, such a sage will arise. The Buddha sent him so that he might cause the Dharma to flourish. It is also written in Vajracchedika Prajnaparamita Sutra that Nagarjuna was a Buddha in the past named "Buddha of Mysterious Clouds." Asvaghosa was once a Buddha as well, and in a past aeon bore the name of "Great Light." ii. As the followers of Hinayana may doubt that Nagarjuna himself wrote these scriptures, therefore we cannot give these teachings as proof that he did not do so. Now, Buddhism is simply a religion of Truth and certainly not one of blind faith and superstition. The Buddhist is always encouraged by his teacher to find out where the highest truth has been taught most clearly; he may compare the Hinayana and Mahayana teachings and a thorough examination may determine that he prefers the latter to the former, thinking that in the latter the truth preached is complete, whereas the truths of the former are not ultimate. It is the exoteric Buddhist tradition to believe the truth but not who said it: truth (but not the person) is the most important. Supposing Nagarjuna had established a religion with a teaching going further than the Buddha's preaching in the Hinayana, then we should believe Nagarjuna and not Buddha, since the former would then have taught a 169

could be taught in the world of men.<br />

Furthermore, we should not forget that the Buddha<br />

foretold the coming of Nagarjuna in the Lankavatara<br />

Sutra, saying that after eight hundred years have passed,<br />

such a sage will arise. The Buddha sent him so that he<br />

might cause the Dharma to flourish. It is also written in<br />

Vajracchedika Prajnaparamita Sutra that Nagarjuna was<br />

a Buddha in the past named "Buddha of Mysterious<br />

Clouds." Asvaghosa was once a Buddha as well, <strong>and</strong> in<br />

a past aeon bore the name of "Great Light."<br />

ii. As the followers of Hinayana may doubt that<br />

Nagarjuna himself wrote these scriptures, therefore we<br />

cannot give these teachings as proof that he did not do<br />

so. Now, Buddhism is simply a religion of Truth <strong>and</strong><br />

certainly not one of blind faith <strong>and</strong> superstition. The<br />

<strong>Buddhist</strong> is always encouraged by his teacher to find out<br />

where the highest truth has been taught most clearly; he<br />

may compare the Hinayana <strong>and</strong> Mahayana teachings<br />

<strong>and</strong> a thorough examination may determine that he<br />

prefers the latter to the former, thinking that in the latter<br />

the truth preached is complete, whereas the truths of the<br />

former are not ultimate. It is the exoteric <strong>Buddhist</strong><br />

tradition to believe the truth but not who said it: truth<br />

(but not the person) is the most important. Supposing<br />

Nagarjuna had established a religion with a teaching<br />

going further than the Buddha's preaching in the<br />

Hinayana, then we should believe Nagarjuna <strong>and</strong> not<br />

Buddha, since the former would then have taught a<br />

169

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!