27.04.2015 Views

download report - Sapienza

download report - Sapienza

download report - Sapienza

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Scientific Report 2007-2009<br />

Theoretical physics<br />

T11. Quantum Cosmology<br />

The necessity for a quantum theory of gravity arises<br />

from fundamental considerations, and, in particular,<br />

from the space-time singularity problem. In fact, the<br />

classical theory of gravity implies the well known singularity<br />

theorems, among which the cosmological one.<br />

Several difficulties in implementing a quantum theory<br />

for the gravitational field can be overcome in minisuperspace<br />

models, for which some degrees of freedom are<br />

frozen out in view of the adopted symmetries. These<br />

models are still highly meaningful, since the most relevant<br />

case is a cosmological space-time.<br />

The study performed within our group improves a research<br />

line centered in the investigation of cosmological<br />

models with a minimal scale. The introduction of a cutoff<br />

can be implemented by inequivalent approaches to<br />

quantum mechanics, which are expected to mimic some<br />

features of the final Quantum Gravity theory.<br />

The polymer representation of quantum mechanics for<br />

a particular homogeneous cosmological space-time (the<br />

Taub Universe) was analyzed in [1] . This approach is<br />

based on a non-standard representation of the canonical<br />

commutation relations and it is relevant in treating<br />

the quantum-mechanical properties of a backgroundindependent<br />

canonical quantum theory of gravity. The<br />

modifications induced by the cut-off scale on ordinary<br />

trajectories were studied from a classical point of view.<br />

Furthermore, the quantum regime was explored in detail<br />

by the investigation of the evolution of wave packets, unveiling<br />

an interference phenomenon between such wave<br />

packets and the potential wall. Nevertheless, the wave<br />

function of the Universe is not peaked far away from the<br />

singularity and falls into it following a classical trajectory;<br />

thus we have to conclude that the singularity is not<br />

removed on a probabilistic level.<br />

A different intuitive approach to introduce a cut-off<br />

is based on deforming the canonical uncertainty relations<br />

leading to the so-called Generalized Uncertainty<br />

Principle (GUP). Such a modification appeared in perturbative<br />

string theory. In the work [2], the Bianchi IX<br />

cosmological model (the Mixmaster Universe) was studied<br />

within the GUP framework. To perform the analysis,<br />

two necessary steps, i.e. the study of the Bianchi I and II<br />

cosmological models, were necessary. The main results<br />

are: (i) The Bianchi I dynamics is still Kasner-like but<br />

is deeply modified since the GUP effects allow for the<br />

existence of two negative Kasner exponents. (ii) The<br />

Bianchi II model is no longer analytically integrable and<br />

therefore no BKL map can be obtained. (iii) The potential<br />

walls of Bianchi IX become stationary with respect<br />

to the point-Universe when the momentum of the latter<br />

is of the same order of the cut-off. We conclude that<br />

the deformed evolution of the Mixmaster Universe is still<br />

chaotic.<br />

The comparison between the polymer- and the GUP-<br />

Taub model illustrates that the interference phenomena<br />

are produced in a complementary way. This feature appears<br />

both at classical level and in the quantum regime,<br />

as the behavior of the wave packets is investigated.<br />

A further research line within our group deals with<br />

the definition of a background independent quantization<br />

of the gravitational field in a generic local Lorentz<br />

frame. This investigation is motivated by the standard<br />

requirement of Loop Quantum Gravity to restrict the local<br />

Lorentz frame by the so-called time gauge condition.<br />

The Hamiltonian formulation without such a gauge fixing<br />

is performed in [3]. The main technical issue is the<br />

emergence of a second-class system of constraints, which<br />

is reduced to a first-class one without fixing the local<br />

Lorentz frame but restricting to a suitable hypersurface<br />

in the full phase space. A privileged set of variables is<br />

selected out and is constituted by non-dynamical boost<br />

parameters and SU(2) connections. Hence, the standard<br />

loop quantization in terms of holonomies and fluxes of<br />

the SU(2) group is still well-grounded. Furthermore,<br />

boost invariance on a quantum level is reproduced by<br />

wave-functionals which do not exhibit any dependence<br />

on boost parameters. The results of this analysis outline<br />

the invariant nature of the discrete space structure<br />

proper of Loop Quantum Gravity and elucidates the fundamental<br />

role that the SU(2) symmetry plays in the<br />

phase-space of gravity.<br />

Finally, wide attention is devoted to study of generalized<br />

formulations of differential geometry in order<br />

to incorporate physical features of fundamental fields<br />

into a unified picture. In particular, in [4], a generalized<br />

connection, including Christoffel coefficients, torsion,<br />

non-metricity tensor and metric-asymmetricity objects,<br />

is analyzed according to the Schouten classification.<br />

The inverse structure matrix is obtained in the<br />

linearized regime, autoparallel trajectories are defined,<br />

and the contribution of the connection components are<br />

clarified at first-order approximation. The restricted sector<br />

in which is retained only a torsion field, is currently<br />

under investigation towards its implementation in the<br />

framework of a Lorentz gauge theory.<br />

References<br />

1. M. V. Battisti et al., Phys. Rev. D78, 103514 (2008).<br />

2. M. V. Battisti et al., Phys. Lett. B681, 179 (2009).<br />

3. F. Cianfrani et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 091301 (2009).<br />

4. S. Casanova et al., Mod. Phys. Lett. A23, 17 (2008).<br />

Authors<br />

M. V. Battisti 6 , R. Benini 6 , F. Cianfrani 6 , O. M. Lecian 6 , G.<br />

Montani 68 , R. Ruffini<br />

<strong>Sapienza</strong> Università di Roma 34 Dipartimento di Fisica

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!