27.04.2015 Views

download report - Sapienza

download report - Sapienza

download report - Sapienza

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Scientific Report 2007-2009<br />

Particle physics<br />

P14. Measurement of the sides of the unitarity triangle<br />

The weak force is responsible for the flavor transition<br />

of quarks which allows unstable particles made of heavy<br />

quarks and antiquarks to decay into lighter particles.<br />

The rates of these decays are related to a set of measurables<br />

called the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa (CKM)<br />

matrix and can be represented in a graphical form as a<br />

triangle in the complex plane, called unitarity triangle<br />

(see Fig.1). The area of this triangle is a measure of the<br />

amount of charge-parity violation caused by the weak<br />

force. To check the consistency of the Standard Model<br />

it is important to determine not only the angles of the<br />

triangle but also the length of its sides. The measurement<br />

of the rate at which bottom quarks decay into up<br />

and charm quarks allows to determine the two elements<br />

of the CKM matrix called V ub and V cb .<br />

The triangle’s right side is instead connected to the<br />

mixing of neutral B mesons, i.e. the process where the<br />

B 0 meson spontaneously turn into a ¯B 0 meson, its antiparticle.<br />

The rate at which this transformation occurs<br />

constrains the length of the right side of the triangle.<br />

The BaBar Rome group has been actively involved<br />

in the analyses aimed at determining both sides of the<br />

triangle using the BaBar detector. In particular, in the<br />

last three years important results have been achieved in<br />

the determination of the V ub and V cb matrix elements.<br />

The semileptonic B meson decays to charm and<br />

charmless mesons (B → Xlν) are the primary tools for<br />

measuring the CKM matrix elements V ub and V cb because<br />

of their simple theoretical description at the quark<br />

level and their relatively large decay rates. The measurement<br />

proceeds as follows. A relatively pure sample<br />

of B ¯B events where one of the two B mesons decays<br />

semileptonically is identified by tagging a lepton and is<br />

reconstructed in a limited range of the phase space. In<br />

some analyses, to reduce the noise from B decays, additional<br />

requirements are applied. For instance, the other<br />

B meson produced in the event is fully reconstructed in<br />

hadronic modes, thus constraining to the kinematics of<br />

the whole event. The partial branching ratio is extracted<br />

and converted in V ub and V cb via theoretical correction<br />

factors. These factors introduce the largest systematic<br />

uncertainty which can range between 5% and 20%, depending<br />

on the analysis.<br />

There are two main analysis methods which are complementary.<br />

The exclusive analysis focuses on the identification<br />

of a given final state, like B → πlν and<br />

B → D ∗ lν [1,2]. This approach is very clean but with the<br />

drawback of much larger theoretical uncertainties due<br />

to the determination of the form factors. The inclusive<br />

analysis, instead, integrates over all possible final state<br />

[3,4]. For example, for the V ub extraction, the X meson<br />

in the B → Xlν decay is required to be compatible with<br />

a charmless state (π, ρ, ω, etc...). The charm contribution<br />

is subtracted using fits to the X mass spectrum, as<br />

shown in Fig.2. This approach is theoretically clean but<br />

it suffers of much larger experimental uncertainties.<br />

The resulting measurements of V ub and V cb constraint<br />

the length of the left side of the triangle with an uncertainty<br />

of ∼ 10%. It is consistent with the expectations,<br />

confirming the success of the Standard Model. More<br />

stringent tests can be expected if there will be a deeper<br />

understanding of theory errors.<br />

Figure 1: Unitarity triangle and CKM matrix elements.<br />

Entries / bin<br />

Entries / bin<br />

3000<br />

2000<br />

1000<br />

300<br />

200<br />

100<br />

0<br />

-100<br />

0 1 2 3 4 5<br />

2<br />

(GeV/c<br />

)<br />

M X<br />

Figure 2: Charmless meson (X) mass spectrum in B → Xlν.<br />

Top: before subtraction of charm contribution (light blue and<br />

black histograms). Bottom: after subtraction.<br />

References<br />

1. B. Aubert et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 171802 (2008).<br />

2. B. Aubert et al. Phys. Rev. D 77, 032002 (2008).<br />

3. B. Aubert et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 231803 (2008).<br />

4. B. Aubert et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 091801 (2007).<br />

Authors<br />

E. Baracchini, F. Bellini, G. Cavoto 1 , D. del Re, E. Di<br />

Marco, R. Faccini, F. Ferrarotto 1 , F. Ferroni, M. Gaspero,<br />

P. D. Jackson 1 , L. Li Gioi, M. A. Mazzoni 1 , S. Morganti 1 ,<br />

G. Piredda 1 , F. Polci, F. Renga, C. Voena 1<br />

http://babar.roma1.infn.it/roma<br />

<strong>Sapienza</strong> Università di Roma 121 Dipartimento di Fisica

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!