download report - Sapienza
download report - Sapienza
download report - Sapienza
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Scientific Report 2007-2009<br />
Particle physics<br />
P7. Precision measurements of CP violation and rare decays of<br />
B-hadrons at the CERN Large Hadron Collider LHC<br />
CP violation, discovered in neutral kaon decays, is still<br />
one of the outstanding mysteries of elementary particle<br />
physics. In the weak interactions CP violation is generated<br />
by the complex three by three unitary matrix known<br />
as the CKM matrix. In cosmology CP violation is one<br />
of the three ingredients required to explain the excess of<br />
matter over antimatter observed in our universe, but the<br />
level of CP violation that can be generated by the Standard<br />
Model is insufficient to explain this excess. This<br />
calls for new sources of CP violation beyond the Standard<br />
Model.<br />
CAVERN<br />
and a 2 mm wire pitch. To check the long-term stability<br />
of the MWPCs in a high radiation environment an ageing<br />
test was performed [3] by exposing a few chambers<br />
to a 800 TBq 60 Co source during one month. Moreover<br />
the efficiency and the time resolution of a MWPC were<br />
measured as a function of the anode HV. The effect of a<br />
high radiation background on these two quantities was<br />
tested by exposing a chamber to a muon beam superimposed<br />
to the gamma flux of a 630 GBq 137 Cs radioactive<br />
source [4]. The results <strong>report</strong>ed in Fig. 2, show that<br />
the MWPCs fulfill the requirements for HV larger than<br />
∼ 2.6 kV.<br />
100<br />
6m<br />
5m<br />
4m RICH1<br />
TT<br />
Vertex<br />
Locator<br />
Magnet<br />
HCAL M4<br />
M3<br />
M5<br />
RICH2 ECAL M2<br />
M1<br />
T1 T2T3<br />
Efficiency (%)<br />
98<br />
96<br />
94<br />
92<br />
Source OFF<br />
Source ON<br />
6<br />
2m<br />
1m<br />
0<br />
5m<br />
10m 15m 20m<br />
Figure 1: LHCb setup. M1−M5 are the muon detectors.<br />
time resolution (ns)<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
0<br />
Source OFF<br />
Source ON<br />
2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8<br />
High Voltage (kV)<br />
To search for such possibilities the LHCb experiment<br />
[1] at the CERN-LHC collider will precisely measure CPviolating<br />
effects and rare decays of B d , B s and D mesons.<br />
To reach these goals the LHCb detector (Fig. 1) must<br />
provide an excellent vertex and momentum resolution<br />
combined with very good particle identification.<br />
Among the decay products of the B and D hadrons,<br />
muons are present in many final states as for example in<br />
the two CP-sensitive B decays, Bd<br />
0 → J/ψ(µ+ µ − )KS<br />
0<br />
and Bs 0 → J/ψ(µ + µ − )ϕ. In addition, the observation<br />
of the flavour-changing neutral current decays like<br />
Bs 0 → µ + µ − and D 0 → µ + µ − may reveal new physics<br />
beyond the Standard Model. Therefore a muon detector<br />
combined with a muon trigger and an offline muon<br />
identification are fundamental requirements of the experiment.<br />
In the last years our laboratory has contributed to<br />
the design of the muon system comprising 1368 multiwire<br />
proportional chambers (MWPCs) and to check their<br />
performance [2]. These chambers must have a time resolution<br />
lower than 4 ns (rms) and an efficiency of at<br />
least 99 % within a 25 ns time window. These stringent<br />
requirements where obtained by using, in most of the<br />
muon detector, four-gap MWPCs with a 5 mm gas gap<br />
Figure 2: Efficiency and time resolution of a MWPC vs.<br />
the anode HV. The effect of the 630 GBq 137 Cs source<br />
is shown to be negligible.<br />
In 2008 the entire setup was mounted on the p-p<br />
collider. The tests with the first proton beam show<br />
that the full setup and in particular the muon detector,<br />
reach the desired performance and are ready for data<br />
taking with the forthcoming machine runs.<br />
References<br />
1. A. Augusto Alves Jr. et al., JINST 3, S08005 (2008).<br />
2. E. Dané et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res.,<br />
Sect. A 572, 682 (2007).<br />
3. M. Anelli et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res.,<br />
Sect. A 599, 171 (2009).<br />
4. M. Anelli et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res.,<br />
Sect. A 593, 319 (2008).<br />
Authors<br />
A. Augusto Alves Jr. 1 , G. Auriemma 1 , V. Bocci 1 , G.<br />
Martellotti 1 , R. Nobrega 1 , G. Penso, D. Pinci 1 , R.<br />
Santacesaria 1 .<br />
http://lhcb.web.cern.ch/lhcb/<br />
<strong>Sapienza</strong> Università di Roma 114 Dipartimento di Fisica