27.04.2015 Views

Computability and Logic

Computability and Logic

Computability and Logic

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

334 MODAL LOGIC AND PROVABILITY<br />

From this <strong>and</strong> the axiom □(□C → C) → □C we get as a tautologous consequence<br />

the conclusion of the lemma.<br />

27.8 Theorem (Segerberg soundness <strong>and</strong> completeness theorems). GL is sound <strong>and</strong><br />

complete for transitive, irreflexive models.<br />

Proof: Soundness. We need only show, in addition to what has been shown in<br />

the proof of the soundness of K + (A3) for transitive models, that if a model is also<br />

irreflexive, then w |= □(□B → B) → □B for any w. To show this we need a notion<br />

of rank.<br />

First note that if > is a transitive, irreflexive relation on a nonempty set W , then<br />

whenever w 0 >w 1 > ··· >w m , by transitivity we have w i >w j whenever i < j, <strong>and</strong><br />

hence by irreflexivity w i ≠ w j whenever i ≠ j. Thus if W has only m elements, we can<br />

never have w 0 >w 1 > ··· >w m . Thus in any transitive, irreflexive model, there is for<br />

any w a greatest natural number k for which there exists elements w = w 0 > ··· >w k .<br />

We call this k the rank rk(w) ofw. If there is no v

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!