25.04.2015 Views

阅读全文请下载PDF文档

阅读全文请下载PDF文档

阅读全文请下载PDF文档

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

* <br />

2009 <br />

“<br />

”<br />

<br />

。<br />

2011 5 <br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

<br />

*<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

、<br />

<br />

80 <br />

Nee<br />

1989<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

Walder<br />

1995Bian & Logan<br />

1996<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

<br />

Akos<br />

1994Lin<br />

1995。<br />

<br />

<br />

Zhou<br />

2000Bian<br />

2002。<br />

<br />

<br />

130


。<br />

<br />

。<br />

90 <br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

1994<br />

1995<br />

<br />

1995 <br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

1996。<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Granovetter<br />

1973Lin<br />

1982Bian<br />

1997。<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

<br />

Bian<br />

1997<br />

<br />

<br />

2006<br />

<br />

2010<br />

、<br />

<br />

2011。<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

“<br />

”<br />

、<br />

<br />

<br />

2001<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

、<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

“<br />

<br />

”<br />

<br />

<br />

“<br />

”<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Granovetter<br />

1973<br />

<br />

“<br />

”<br />

<br />

<br />

Lin<br />

1982<br />

“<br />

”<br />

<br />

<br />

131


“<br />

”<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Bian<br />

1997。<br />

Mouw<br />

2003<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

2010<br />

、<br />

<br />

2011<br />

、<br />

<br />

2011。<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

1996 <br />

“<br />

”<br />

<br />

、<br />

<br />

2000<br />

<br />

<br />

2003。<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

Granovetter<br />

1985 <br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Lin<br />

2001。<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

1996 <br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Stiglitiz<br />

2000。<br />

、<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Lin<br />

2001。<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

132<br />

2012. 1


Granovetter<br />

1973。<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Saloner<br />

1985。<br />

、<br />

。<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Putnam<br />

1993。<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Bian<br />

1997。<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

<br />

、<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

、<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

<br />

、<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

<br />

Nee<br />

1989Bian<br />

1997 <br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Nee<br />

1989 <br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

1994<br />

1995。<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

133


2012. 1<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

1 。<br />

1<br />

<br />

<br />

—<br />

<br />

—<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

、<br />

2011。<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

。<br />

、<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Lin 2001。<br />

<br />

Lin<br />

2001<br />

<br />

、<br />

2010<br />

。<br />

Granovetter<br />

1973 Bian1997<br />

、<br />

2001<br />

134


。<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

2004。<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

。<br />

、<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Nee<br />

1989Bian<br />

1997<br />

Zhou<br />

2000。<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

、<br />

<br />

2001 <br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

1<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

1 - 1<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

135


2012. 1<br />

1 - 2<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

<br />

、<br />

<br />

。1984 <br />

<br />

《<br />

》<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

、<br />

。<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

<br />

。1992 <br />

1993 <br />

《<br />

》<br />

。1994 <br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

、<br />

。<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

2<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

2 - 1<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

2 - 2<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

136


、 、<br />

<br />

<br />

2009 6 - 10 <br />

“<br />

<br />

”<br />

。 1 <br />

、PPS <br />

。<br />

<br />

7 1 、<br />

18 - 69 <br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

7102 <br />

<br />

<br />

5387 。<br />

<br />

1. <br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

2. <br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

1<br />

。<br />

<br />

。<br />

1<br />

2 3 4<br />

2004。<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

、<br />

。<br />

、<br />

<br />

6 <br />

<br />

0 - 100 、<br />

2001。<br />

2。<br />

1<br />

<br />

、 、 、 、 、 、 。<br />

137


2012. 1<br />

2<br />

<br />

<br />

. 863 35. 57<br />

. 857 20. 13<br />

. 738 0<br />

. 658 100<br />

. 625 6634<br />

. 501 51. 7%<br />

2<br />

。<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

<br />

“ ”<br />

Lin 2001。<br />

<br />

<br />

。 2004<br />

<br />

。“ ”<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

、<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

3<br />

。<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Nee 1989Bian & Logan 1996。<br />

3. <br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

1 48 。<br />

<br />

1<br />

<br />

<br />

6 <br />

、 、<br />

、<br />

。<br />

138


。<br />

<br />

、<br />

2006。<br />

3<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

6036 2075. 3 1841. 6 = 100 = 10000<br />

<br />

6036 7. 28 . 92 = 4. 61 = 9. 21<br />

<br />

6638 35. 25 18. 61 = 0 = 100<br />

6668 27. 18 30. 67 = 1 = 300<br />

6752 74. 00 24. 35 = 6 = 95<br />

6719 5. 52 3. 91 = 0 = 20<br />

<br />

6752 . 67 . 47 0 = 1 = <br />

<br />

6752 . 31 . 46 0 = 1 = <br />

<br />

6752 . 38 . 49 0 = 1 = <br />

7080 7. 61 2. 99 = 3 = 15<br />

<br />

7062 . 36 . 18 = 0. 11 = 0. 75<br />

<br />

7089 12. 2 3. 26 = 0 = 18<br />

6980 . 37 . 48 1 = <br />

0 = <br />

6946 1 = <br />

2 = <br />

3 =<br />

<br />

7101 . 47 . 50 1 = <br />

0 = <br />

7093 . 18 . 39 1 = <br />

0 = <br />

7096 . 84 . 37 1 = <br />

0 = <br />

7101 . 83 . 38 1 = <br />

0 = <br />

7084 43. 14 13. 36 = 17 = 77<br />

6001 8. 13 4. 82 = 0 = 18<br />

7102 . 62 . 49 1 = <br />

0 = <br />

<br />

6832 6. 89 . 61 = 3. 22 = 8. 01<br />

139


2012. 1<br />

4. <br />

<br />

、<br />

、<br />

、<br />

。<br />

<br />

、<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

1 <br />

<br />

。 2 <br />

<br />

。3 。<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

2004。<br />

<br />

<br />

2004 <br />

。<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

QuantθY *<br />

Y * = X'β θ<br />

+ μ θ<br />

QuantθY *<br />

QuantθY *<br />

X= X'β θ<br />

X μ θ <br />

X= 0。 θ 0 < θ < 1 β θ <br />

∑ θ Y i - X i β + ∑ 1 - θ Y i<br />

iY i ≥X i β<br />

iY i ≤X i β<br />

min 1 n<br />

β<br />

<br />

- X i β <br />

<br />

θ 1 - θ 。 θ 0 < θ < 1<br />

∧<br />

QuantθY *<br />

∧<br />

X= X' β θ<br />

<br />

。<br />

。<br />

0. 25、0. 5、0. 75<br />

1<br />

2<br />

<br />

2006<br />

。<br />

、 、 、<br />

、<br />

。<br />

140


。<br />

、<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

logy ik = β 0k + β 1k x 1ik + β 2k x 2 1ik + β 3k x 2ik + β 4k x 2 2ik<br />

+ β 5k x 3ik + β 6k x 4ik + ∑β j x jik + ε ik 1<br />

x 1ik <br />

x 2ik <br />

x 3ik x 4ik β j <br />

。<br />

<br />

β 0k = α 0 + μ 0k<br />

β 1k = α 1 + λ 1 z k + λ 2 z 2 k + μ 1k<br />

β 3k = α 2 + λ 3 z k + λ 4 z 2 k + μ 2k<br />

β 5k = α 3 + λ 5 z k + μ 3k<br />

β 6k = α 4 + λ 6 z k + μ 4k<br />

β j = α j 2<br />

2 β 0k <br />

<br />

<br />

β 1k <br />

<br />

<br />

β 3k <br />

<br />

<br />

β 5k <br />

<br />

<br />

β 6k <br />

<br />

<br />

β j <br />

<br />

。<br />

2 1<br />

logy ik = α 0 + μ 0k + α 1 + λ 1 z k + λ 2 z 2 k + μ 1k x 1ik + α 5 x 2 1ik<br />

+ α 2 + λ 3 z k + λ 4 z 2 k + μ 2k x 2ik + α 6 x 2 2ik<br />

+ α 3 + λ 5 z k + μ 3k x 3ik + α 4 + λ 6 z k + μ 4k x 4ik<br />

+ ∑α j x jik + ε ik 3<br />

141


2012. 1<br />

3<br />

logy ik = α 0 + α 1 x 1ik + α 2 x 2ik + α 3 x 3ik + α 4 x 4ik + α 5 x 2 1ik + α 6 x 2 2ik<br />

+ ∑α j x jik + λ 1 z k x 1ik + λ 2 z 2 kx 1ik + λ 3 z k x 2ik + λ 4 z 2 kx 2ik + λ 5 z k x 3ik<br />

+ λ 6 z k x 4ik + μ 0k + μ 1k x 1ik + μ 2k x 2ik + μ 3k x 3ik + μ 4k x 4ik + ε ik 4<br />

、<br />

1 <br />

<br />

。1 2 <br />

<br />

<br />

1 <br />

<br />

U 。<br />

4 <br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

2 <br />

<br />

1 6. 5% 2 <br />

Xie &<br />

Hannum 1996 、<br />

2003<br />

2009 <br />

、<br />

<br />

2% - 10% <br />

<br />

<br />

19. 5% 。 <br />

<br />

。<br />

3 <br />

“ ”<br />

<br />

“ ”<br />

。<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

。 <br />

<br />

。 <br />

1<br />

2<br />

Stata qfit <br />

Qfitquadratic prediction plot。<br />

<br />

exp0. 063- 1。 。<br />

142


U <br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

1 1 - 1 1 - 2 。<br />

1 。<br />

4<br />

<br />

1<br />

2 3<br />

<br />

<br />

. 008 ***<br />

<br />

/100 - . 008 ***<br />

<br />

. 052 ***<br />

<br />

/100 - . 108 **<br />

. 063 *** . 051 ***<br />

<br />

. 178 *** . 165 ***<br />

<br />

. 087 *** . 174 *** . 153 ***<br />

<br />

<br />

. 424 *** . 298 *** . 254 ***<br />

. 179 *** . 117 *** . 095 ***<br />

<br />

. 265 *** . 226 *** . 206 ***<br />

<br />

. 048 . 089 ** . 112 ***<br />

<br />

. 034 . 111 *** . 109 ***<br />

- . 013 *** - . 007 *** - . 005 ***<br />

<br />

<br />

. 094 ** . 052 . 046<br />

. 152 *** . 064 * . 047<br />

. 260 *** . 121 *** . 106 **<br />

. 054 . 055 . 061<br />

<br />

. 157 *** . 143 *** . 168 ***<br />

<br />

. 366 *** . 303 *** . 264 ***<br />

4. 857 *** 4. 283 *** 3. 976 ***<br />

5153 5153 5153<br />

R 2 . 257 . 309 . 328<br />

BIC 11458. 8 11095. 1 10980. 3<br />

* p < 0. 05**p < 0. 01***p < 0. 001。<br />

143


2012. 1<br />

1<br />

<br />

2<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

16. 5% <br />

<br />

<br />

28. 9% <br />

10. 0% <br />

<br />

22. 9% <br />

11. 9% <br />

11. 5% <br />

1<br />

<br />

0. 5% <br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

18. 3% 。<br />

<br />

<br />

。5 <br />

。<br />

144


5<br />

<br />

0. 25 0. 5 0. 75 <br />

. 008 *** . 009 *** . 006 ***<br />

<br />

/100 - . 009 *** - . 009 *** - . 005 *<br />

. 049 *** . 040 *** . 024 **<br />

<br />

/100 - . 118 ** - . 076 * . 006<br />

. 056 *** . 054 *** . 048 ***<br />

<br />

. 157 *** . 103 *** . 112 ***<br />

<br />

. 096 *** . 112 *** . 178 ***<br />

<br />

<br />

. 218 *** . 264 *** . 266 ***<br />

. 092 *** . 122 *** . 130 ***<br />

<br />

. 209 *** . 206 *** . 208 ***<br />

<br />

. 171 *** . 126 *** . 141 ***<br />

<br />

. 114 *** . 137 *** . 136 ***<br />

- . 006 *** - . 002 - . 002<br />

<br />

<br />

. 103 ** . 039 . 031<br />

. 080 * . 068 * . 023<br />

. 042 . 160 *** . 130 ***<br />

. 038 . 043 . 083 **<br />

<br />

. 165 *** . 178 *** . 163 ***<br />

<br />

. 270 *** . 253 *** . 276 ***<br />

3. 694 *** 4. 030 *** 4. 356 ***<br />

5167 5167 5167<br />

* p < 0. 05**p < 0. 01***p < 0. 001。<br />

5 <br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

。 1 <br />

。 <br />

<br />

。 5 <br />

0. 008<br />

0. 049<br />

0. 006 0. 024 <br />

<br />

。<br />

145


2012. 1<br />

<br />

<br />

、<br />

- 0. 009、- 0. 005 <br />

、<br />

- 0. 118、- 0. 006 <br />

。 <br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

2 <br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

。6 <br />

<br />

<br />

、<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

0. 032 <br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Bian 1997Zhou 2000。<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

6<br />

、<br />

<br />

<br />

5. 943 *** 5. 891 *** 5. 849 ***<br />

. 008 *** . 008 *** . 019 ***<br />

<br />

/100 - . 007 *** - . 007 *** - . 008 ***<br />

. 046 *** . 046 *** . 002<br />

<br />

/100 - . 069 * - . 070 * - . 076 *<br />

. 053 *** . 044 *** . 059 ***<br />

<br />

. 134 *** . 124 * . 106 <br />

146


6<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

. 274 *** . 270 *** . 264 ***<br />

. 112 *** . 109 *** . 103 ***<br />

<br />

. 185 *** . 186 *** . 185 ***<br />

<br />

. 193 *** . 197 *** . 201 ***<br />

<br />

. 079 ** . 080 ** . 079 **<br />

- . 005 *** - . 005 *** - . 005 ***<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

. 035 . 036 . 036<br />

. 056 . 053 . 053<br />

. 075 * . 068 . 069 *<br />

. 032 . 032 . 026<br />

<br />

* . 032 * - . 009<br />

* . 025 . 075<br />

<br />

* - . 066 ***<br />

<br />

* . 083 ***<br />

<br />

* . 233 ***<br />

<br />

* - . 234 **<br />

<br />

Varμ 0 . 06 . 02 . 01<br />

Varμ 1 2. 60 × 10 - 4 2. 60 × 10 - 4<br />

Varμ 2 9. 28 × 10 - 22 5. 20 × 10 - 18<br />

<br />

Varμ 1 3. 77 × 10 - 6<br />

<br />

Varμ 2 3. 20 × 10 - 6<br />

<br />

Varε . 48 . 48 . 47<br />

rho . 111 . 039 . 028<br />

5387 5387 5387<br />

Log likelihood - 5714. 1 *** - 5698. 4 *** - 5682. 1 ***<br />

<br />

LR chi2 test . 000 . 000<br />

p < 0. 1* p < 0. 05**p < 0. 01***p < 0. 001。<br />

147


2012. 1<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

- 0. 066<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

0. 083 <br />

<br />

。<br />

2 2 - 1 。<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

0. 233<br />

<br />

<br />

- 0. 234 <br />

<br />

。<br />

2 2 - 2。 <br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

、<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

。 <br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

148


。<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

“<br />

”<br />

。<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

<br />

<br />

。<br />

149


2012. 1<br />

<br />

<br />

2004《<br />

<br />

》《<br />

4 。<br />

、<br />

2001《<br />

》《<br />

》2 。<br />

、<br />

2001《 、<br />

》《<br />

》2 。<br />

、<br />

2006《<br />

2003 <br />

》《<br />

》2 。<br />

<br />

2009《<br />

》《<br />

》2 。<br />

<br />

1994《 “<br />

”》《 》1 。<br />

——— 1995《<br />

》《<br />

》1 。<br />

——— 1996《<br />

》《 》4 。<br />

<br />

1995《<br />

<br />

》《 》6 。<br />

、<br />

2003《<br />

》《<br />

》6 。<br />

<br />

2006《<br />

<br />

<br />

》《 》4 。<br />

——— 2010《<br />

》《 》5 。<br />

、<br />

2010《<br />

<br />

》《<br />

<br />

》6 。<br />

、<br />

2011《 、<br />

》《 》3 。<br />

、<br />

2011《<br />

<br />

》《 》3 。<br />

、<br />

2011《<br />

<br />

》《 》1<br />

。<br />

<br />

1996《<br />

》《<br />

1 。<br />

<br />

2006《<br />

》《 》6 。<br />

、<br />

2000《“ ”<br />

》《<br />

》2 。<br />

<br />

2003《<br />

》《<br />

》4 。<br />

AkosRona-Tas 1994“The First Shall Be the LastEntrepreneurship and the Communist Cadres<br />

in the Transition form Socialism. ”American Journal of Sociology 1001.<br />

Bian Yanjie 1997“Bringing Strong Ties back inIndirect TiesNetwork Bridges and Job Searches<br />

in China. ”American Sociological Review 623.<br />

——— 2002“Chinese Social Stratification and Social Mobility. ”Annual Review of Sociology 28.<br />

BianYanjie & John R. Logan 1996“Market Transition and the Persistence of PowerThe Changing<br />

Stratification System in Urban China. ”American Sociological Review 615.<br />

GranovetterM. 1973“The Strength of Weak Ties. ”American Journal of Sociology 786.<br />

——— 1985“Economic Action and Social StructureThe Problem of Embeddedness. ”American<br />

Journal of Sociology 913.<br />

LinNan 1982Social Resources and Instrumental Action . Social Structure and Network Analysis.<br />

150


Beverly HillsCALondonSage Publications.<br />

——— 1995“Local Market SocialismLocal Corporatism in Action in Rural China. ”Theory and<br />

Society 243.<br />

——— 2001Social CapitalA Theory of Social Structure and Action. New YorkCambridge University<br />

Press.<br />

MouwT. 2003“Social Capital and Finding a JobDo Contacts Matter”American Sociological<br />

Review 686.<br />

NeeVictor 1989.“A Theory of Market TransitionFrom Redistribution to Markets in State Socialism.<br />

”American Sociological Review 545.<br />

PutnamR. 1993Making Democracy WorkCivic Traditions in Modern Italy. PrincetonPrinceton<br />

University Press.<br />

SalonerGarth 1985“Old Boy Networks as Screening Mechanisms. ”Journal of Labor Economics 3<br />

3.<br />

StiglitzJ. 2000“Formal and Informal Institution. ”In P. Dasgupta & I. Serageldineds. Social<br />

CapitalA Multi-faceted Perspective. WashingtonDCWorld Bank.<br />

WalderAndrew G. 1995“Local Governments as Industrial FirmsAn Organizational Analysis of<br />

China's Transitional Economy. ”American Journal of Sociology 1012.<br />

Xie Yu & Emily Hannum 1996“Regional Variation in Earnings Inequality in Reform - Era Urban<br />

China Regional Variation in Earnings Inequality in Reform-Era Urban China. ”American Journal<br />

of Sociology 1014<br />

ZhouXueguang 2000“Economic Transformation and Income Inequality in Urban ChinaEvidence<br />

from Panel Data. ”American Journal of Sociology 1054.<br />

<br />

、<br />

<br />

<br />

151


AbstractBased on synthesized perspective of formal and informal institutions and a<br />

case of Yonglian village this paper analyzes the evolution of relationship between village<br />

and enterprise. The result shows that because of formal institutions the productivity<br />

of entrepreneurs' human capital is getting higher and higher compared with the<br />

productivity of village leaders' political capital. As a resultenterprise is increasingly<br />

dominant in the relationship between village and enterprise. Howeverbecause of informal<br />

institutionsespecially social contractthe evolution of relationship between<br />

village and enterprise is nonlinear but diverse. One of the diverse evolution models is<br />

the change from“the company of village”to“the village of company”. “The village<br />

of company”model is of intrinsic efficiency and stability because it is constructed and<br />

enhanced by both formal and informal institutions.<br />

The Practical Logic of Rural Land Property Rights as a Bundle of RelationshipsA<br />

new analytical framework …………… Zang Deshun 78<br />

AbstractBased on Zhou Xueguang's proposition“property rights as a bundle of relationships”<br />

the author proposes the analytical conceptsprinciples levels and the typology<br />

of“rural land property rights as a bundle of relationships”. The author then<br />

observes and analyzes the new changes of rural land property rights and social structures<br />

using this new analytical framework. The new theory on rural land property<br />

rights is empirically supported by four typical land dispute cases from Zang village.<br />

The conclusion of this article is that social relations have played an important role in<br />

shaping the boundaries forms and interests of rural land property rights.<br />

The Evolution of Assortative Mating Patterns in the Process of China's<br />

Modernization ……………………… Qi Yaqiang & Niu Jianlin 106<br />

AbstractDrawing data from the CGSS2006this paper examines the phenomenon<br />

and evolution of assortative mating patterns in China during the past several decades.<br />

Results show that the main pattern of China's assortative mating is the prevalence of<br />

homogamy across various social groups. In the case of heterogamous marriagessignificant<br />

symmetrical patterns are observed. The assortative mating patterns in China<br />

evolve over time during the past half centurywhich provides partial support to the<br />

industrialization theoryalong with China's industrialization and modernizationthe<br />

achieved characteristics have been increasingly important in the mating selection<br />

processwhile the importance of the ascribed features had been declining until the<br />

1990sand then started to rise again since the early 1990sdue to the rising uncertainty<br />

along with deeper marketization and modernization. Finallyfurther analysis<br />

shows that the likelihood of homogamy /heterogamy for specific subgroups varied substantially<br />

in the past several decades.<br />

Market Reforms and the Income Effects of Social Network Capital …<br />

……………………………… Zhang Shun & Cheng Cheng 130<br />

244


AbstractSocial network capital is an important mechanism affecting income distribution.<br />

The authors decompose social network capital into the forms of potential and<br />

mobilized social network capitaland find that the higher the two forms of social network<br />

capital the higher the incomebut the rates of income return decrease with the<br />

increase of social network capital. The authors also find that in localities with a higher<br />

degree of marketizationthe income return to potential social network capital is<br />

lower but income return to mobilized social network capital is higheralthough the<br />

rate of income return is getting lower with increasing marketization. The authors explore<br />

the underlying logic of these findings from the perspective of interactions of multiple<br />

mechanisms of resources allocation in the context of varied degrees of marketization<br />

across localities.<br />

A Study on the Income Effects of Hukou Reform on the Floating Population<br />

………………………………………………… Wei Wanqing 152<br />

AbstractTraditional studies explaining the effect of Hukou types on wage disparity<br />

basically adopt Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition framework. However the Blinder-Oaxaca<br />

decomposition method in studying the mean income differences between urban<br />

residents and migrant workers couldn't eliminate two types of selection bias in observational<br />

datathe first type is due to the heterogeneity of sampleand the second bias<br />

is due to the omission of key variables. Adopting the newly developed propensity<br />

score matching method to control for sample selection biasand the Bootstrap method<br />

to overcome the small sample biasthis paper tries to explore the income effects of<br />

Hukou restriction on floating population based on China's household income survey<br />

data. The results show that 1the effect of Hukou on the income of migrants is<br />

very significantand the negative effect with control for sample selection biasis<br />

higher than those of ordinary regression results with proxy variables 2the effect of<br />

Hukou on low propensity scores migrants is positive however the effect on high propensity<br />

scores migrants is negative 3the higher the degree of marketizationthe<br />

stronger the negative effects.<br />

Some Reflections on the Corporatist Model and Its Applicability in the<br />

Studies of the Relationship between State and Society in China ………<br />

………………………………………………… Wu Jianping 174<br />

AbstractRecently the corporatist model has been used more and more frequently to<br />

generalize or predict the development of the relationship between state and society in<br />

Chinaespecially in the studies of labor unions or employers. The author argues that<br />

the generalization and prediction of China based on the corporatist model is inappropriatebecause<br />

they are based on a biased understanding of corporatism. The author<br />

then proposes that we should have a general or comprehensive understanding of corpo-<br />

245

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!