sustainable development 20 years on from the ... - José Eli da Veiga
sustainable development 20 years on from the ... - José Eli da Veiga
sustainable development 20 years on from the ... - José Eli da Veiga
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
26<br />
inequality, access to basic services, health, and food security. The analysis c<strong>on</strong>ducted here starts <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
premise that a society with high levels of poverty and inequality is not <str<strong>on</strong>g>sustainable</str<strong>on</strong>g>, no matter how well<br />
protected <strong>the</strong> envir<strong>on</strong>ment. C<strong>on</strong>versely, <strong>the</strong> existence of poverty does not exempt States <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
resp<strong>on</strong>sibility to take whatever measures and make whatever investments are needed to ensure proper<br />
envir<strong>on</strong>mental stewardship, because <strong>the</strong> poor are disproporti<strong>on</strong>ately disadvantaged, both directly and<br />
indirectly, by envir<strong>on</strong>mental degra<strong>da</strong>ti<strong>on</strong>. Damage to <strong>the</strong> envir<strong>on</strong>ment also limits <strong>the</strong> resources available<br />
to future generati<strong>on</strong>s for staying out of poverty. Many of <strong>the</strong> measures needed to ensure envir<strong>on</strong>mental<br />
sustainability are, in fact, <strong>the</strong> very acti<strong>on</strong>s needed to protect <strong>the</strong> ec<strong>on</strong>omic, social and cultural rights<br />
enshrined in internati<strong>on</strong>al c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>s, such as those that refer to housing, water and sanitati<strong>on</strong>, which<br />
Millennium Development Goal 7 cites as targets for envir<strong>on</strong>mental sustainability.<br />
1. Poverty and inequality<br />
In <strong>the</strong> past <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>years</str<strong>on</strong>g>, <strong>the</strong> Latin American and Caribbean regi<strong>on</strong> as a whole has made headway in reducing<br />
poverty (see figure I.1) and, albeit to a smaller extent, in narrowing inequality and improving employment<br />
indicators (see figure I.2), notwithstanding <strong>the</strong> crisis of <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>08-<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>09 (ECLAC, <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>10a). The regi<strong>on</strong>’s HDI 2<br />
showed substantial gains between 1990 and <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>10 (see figure I.3). The Gini coefficient, which measures<br />
income distributi<strong>on</strong> inequality, also improved between <strong>the</strong> early 1990s and around <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>09, moving down<br />
<strong>from</strong> 0.538 to 0.5<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>. This may be a small change, but it is highly significant in a regi<strong>on</strong> where inequity<br />
has always been particularly recalcitrant (ECLAC, <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>10a). Since <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>02, <strong>the</strong> reducti<strong>on</strong> in both poverty and<br />
inequality has been attributable to real gains in labour income —associated in most cases with<br />
simultaneously rising income per employed pers<strong>on</strong> with respect to <strong>the</strong> unemployed or dependent<br />
populati<strong>on</strong>— and to narrowing labour income gaps between highly skilled and less skilled earners and an<br />
increase in income transfers to <strong>the</strong> poorest populati<strong>on</strong> (ECLAC, <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>11a).<br />
The progress is relative, however, since <strong>the</strong> Latin American and Caribbean regi<strong>on</strong> is still <strong>the</strong> most<br />
unequal in <strong>the</strong> world (see figure I.4 and UNDP, <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>10a). Despite <strong>the</strong> improvements, <strong>the</strong> regi<strong>on</strong>’s poverty<br />
and indigence levels remain high and <strong>the</strong> gap with respect to <strong>the</strong> developed countries has not narrowed.<br />
The poor and indigent populati<strong>on</strong> in <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>10 —177 milli<strong>on</strong>— was larger in absolute terms than in 1980 (see<br />
figure I.1). The regi<strong>on</strong>’s HDI for <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>10 was still behind <strong>the</strong> 1990 figure for <strong>the</strong> countries of <strong>the</strong><br />
Organizati<strong>on</strong> for Ec<strong>on</strong>omic Cooperati<strong>on</strong> and Development (OECD) (see figure I.3).<br />
Aside <strong>from</strong> ec<strong>on</strong>omic resources, <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>cept of poverty may encompass aspects of psychological<br />
well-being or n<strong>on</strong>-market assets such as literacy or access to natural resources or ecosystem services.<br />
Poverty can, <strong>the</strong>n, be defined as <strong>the</strong> lack of certain basic capabilities (ECLAC, <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>11a). From a human<br />
rights perspective, <strong>the</strong> Committee <strong>on</strong> Ec<strong>on</strong>omic, Social and Cultural Rights defines poverty as “a human<br />
c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong> characterized by sustained or chr<strong>on</strong>ic deprivati<strong>on</strong> of <strong>the</strong> resources, capabilities, choices, security<br />
and power necessary for <strong>the</strong> enjoyment of an adequate stan<strong>da</strong>rd of living and o<strong>the</strong>r civil, cultural,<br />
ec<strong>on</strong>omic, political and social rights” (CESCR, <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>01).<br />
2<br />
The Human Development Index (HDI) is calculated by <strong>the</strong> United Nati<strong>on</strong>s Development Programme (UNDP) <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
basis of <strong>the</strong> geometrical average of measurements of life expectancy, educati<strong>on</strong> and per capita gross nati<strong>on</strong>al income.