25.04.2015 Views

sustainable development 20 years on from the ... - José Eli da Veiga

sustainable development 20 years on from the ... - José Eli da Veiga

sustainable development 20 years on from the ... - José Eli da Veiga

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

26<br />

inequality, access to basic services, health, and food security. The analysis c<strong>on</strong>ducted here starts <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

premise that a society with high levels of poverty and inequality is not <str<strong>on</strong>g>sustainable</str<strong>on</strong>g>, no matter how well<br />

protected <strong>the</strong> envir<strong>on</strong>ment. C<strong>on</strong>versely, <strong>the</strong> existence of poverty does not exempt States <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

resp<strong>on</strong>sibility to take whatever measures and make whatever investments are needed to ensure proper<br />

envir<strong>on</strong>mental stewardship, because <strong>the</strong> poor are disproporti<strong>on</strong>ately disadvantaged, both directly and<br />

indirectly, by envir<strong>on</strong>mental degra<strong>da</strong>ti<strong>on</strong>. Damage to <strong>the</strong> envir<strong>on</strong>ment also limits <strong>the</strong> resources available<br />

to future generati<strong>on</strong>s for staying out of poverty. Many of <strong>the</strong> measures needed to ensure envir<strong>on</strong>mental<br />

sustainability are, in fact, <strong>the</strong> very acti<strong>on</strong>s needed to protect <strong>the</strong> ec<strong>on</strong>omic, social and cultural rights<br />

enshrined in internati<strong>on</strong>al c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>s, such as those that refer to housing, water and sanitati<strong>on</strong>, which<br />

Millennium Development Goal 7 cites as targets for envir<strong>on</strong>mental sustainability.<br />

1. Poverty and inequality<br />

In <strong>the</strong> past <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>years</str<strong>on</strong>g>, <strong>the</strong> Latin American and Caribbean regi<strong>on</strong> as a whole has made headway in reducing<br />

poverty (see figure I.1) and, albeit to a smaller extent, in narrowing inequality and improving employment<br />

indicators (see figure I.2), notwithstanding <strong>the</strong> crisis of <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>08-<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>09 (ECLAC, <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>10a). The regi<strong>on</strong>’s HDI 2<br />

showed substantial gains between 1990 and <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>10 (see figure I.3). The Gini coefficient, which measures<br />

income distributi<strong>on</strong> inequality, also improved between <strong>the</strong> early 1990s and around <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>09, moving down<br />

<strong>from</strong> 0.538 to 0.5<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>. This may be a small change, but it is highly significant in a regi<strong>on</strong> where inequity<br />

has always been particularly recalcitrant (ECLAC, <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>10a). Since <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>02, <strong>the</strong> reducti<strong>on</strong> in both poverty and<br />

inequality has been attributable to real gains in labour income —associated in most cases with<br />

simultaneously rising income per employed pers<strong>on</strong> with respect to <strong>the</strong> unemployed or dependent<br />

populati<strong>on</strong>— and to narrowing labour income gaps between highly skilled and less skilled earners and an<br />

increase in income transfers to <strong>the</strong> poorest populati<strong>on</strong> (ECLAC, <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>11a).<br />

The progress is relative, however, since <strong>the</strong> Latin American and Caribbean regi<strong>on</strong> is still <strong>the</strong> most<br />

unequal in <strong>the</strong> world (see figure I.4 and UNDP, <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>10a). Despite <strong>the</strong> improvements, <strong>the</strong> regi<strong>on</strong>’s poverty<br />

and indigence levels remain high and <strong>the</strong> gap with respect to <strong>the</strong> developed countries has not narrowed.<br />

The poor and indigent populati<strong>on</strong> in <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>10 —177 milli<strong>on</strong>— was larger in absolute terms than in 1980 (see<br />

figure I.1). The regi<strong>on</strong>’s HDI for <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>10 was still behind <strong>the</strong> 1990 figure for <strong>the</strong> countries of <strong>the</strong><br />

Organizati<strong>on</strong> for Ec<strong>on</strong>omic Cooperati<strong>on</strong> and Development (OECD) (see figure I.3).<br />

Aside <strong>from</strong> ec<strong>on</strong>omic resources, <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>cept of poverty may encompass aspects of psychological<br />

well-being or n<strong>on</strong>-market assets such as literacy or access to natural resources or ecosystem services.<br />

Poverty can, <strong>the</strong>n, be defined as <strong>the</strong> lack of certain basic capabilities (ECLAC, <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>11a). From a human<br />

rights perspective, <strong>the</strong> Committee <strong>on</strong> Ec<strong>on</strong>omic, Social and Cultural Rights defines poverty as “a human<br />

c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong> characterized by sustained or chr<strong>on</strong>ic deprivati<strong>on</strong> of <strong>the</strong> resources, capabilities, choices, security<br />

and power necessary for <strong>the</strong> enjoyment of an adequate stan<strong>da</strong>rd of living and o<strong>the</strong>r civil, cultural,<br />

ec<strong>on</strong>omic, political and social rights” (CESCR, <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>01).<br />

2<br />

The Human Development Index (HDI) is calculated by <strong>the</strong> United Nati<strong>on</strong>s Development Programme (UNDP) <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

basis of <strong>the</strong> geometrical average of measurements of life expectancy, educati<strong>on</strong> and per capita gross nati<strong>on</strong>al income.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!