sustainable development 20 years on from the ... - José Eli da Veiga

sustainable development 20 years on from the ... - José Eli da Veiga sustainable development 20 years on from the ... - José Eli da Veiga

25.04.2015 Views

233 B. GUIDELINES FOR THE INTEGRATION OF THE THREE PILLARS OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT The guidelines proposed below are designed to bring together the environmental, social and economic dimensions of ong>developmentong> by means of institutional, legal and economic instruments, information and capacity-building. They do not follow the traditional sector-based approach. Instead they seek to close persistent gaps in the implementation of ong>sustainableong> ong>developmentong> by means of cross-cutting proposals that have an impact in more than one sector. Moreover, although the heterogeneity of the region precludes a blanket approach, these cross-cutting guidelines concern characteristics generally seen throughout the region. Certain basic principles underlie the guidelines, including respect for human rights and priority consideration of the interests of groups who are at a potential disadvantage, including women, indigenous peoples, Afro-descendants, older persons, children and persons with disabilities in relation to discrimination, poverty, health and socioeconomic inequality (see introductory chapter). Guideline 1 Create synergies among inclusion, social protection, human security, empowerment of people, disaster risk reduction and environmental protection Investment can have a very positive impact on both well-being and social inclusion, as well as on the environment. In this context, unmet social demands, such as expanding the coverage of basic services, generating markets for care services (the care economy) and investment in infrastructure, quality public transport and services relating to disaster risk reduction can create new sources of economic growth, encourage the creation of decent work with a very low —or even positive— environmental impact and promote broad social inclusion. The poor are most likely to bear the costs of environmental degradation. This creates a vicious circle as poverty is perpetuated, often over generations. The cycle can only be broken by means of complementary systemic policies tackling: (i) social protection (in a broad sense, including policies on minimum wage, pensions, access to health care, education and other basic services) and environmental protection; and (ii) the empowerment of people to increase their resilience and enable them to develop their potential and participate fully in decision-making. The human security approach provides a strong policy framework which combines protection and empowerment and is based on five principles: it is people-centred, multi-dimensional, comprehensive, context-specific and prevention-oriented. 1 The following actions are suggested under this guideline: 1 See OCHA (ong>20ong>09), quoted in UNCRD (ong>20ong>10).

234 (a) Implement mechanisms such as public investment, regulation and public-private partnerships to expand services that can contribute to simultaneously overcoming social and environmental deficits, adaptation to climate change and disaster risk reduction, with an emphasis on the creation of decent jobs Examples include: (i) expanding and improving the quality of public transport; (ii) implementing formal systems for the collection, sorting, recycling and treatment of waste. In Brazil, for example, the recycling of aluminium cans provides employment for nearly 170,000 people and 28,000 formal jobs are associated with paper recycling (United Nations, ong>20ong>10); (iii) investing in the implementation of strategies for disaster risk reduction and adaptation to climate change; (iv) research and ong>developmentong> of alternatives to polluting technologies and the use of biological resources; (v) using environmental conditional transfers following the examples in the social sphere; (vi) capacity-building for monitoring resource management and compliance with regulations. Investment is also needed to break the cycle of poverty, vulnerability and the effects of environmental degradation. The links between these three factors need to be analysed to ensure optimum allocation of public resources and promote cooperation, including South-South cooperation, with a view to replicating successful strategies. Examples of these links include: (i) air pollution and respiratory diseases (including the costs for public health-care systems) (see chapter I); (ii) the treatment of wastewater and gastrointestinal diseases (including the costs for public health-care systems) (see chapter I); (iii) the expansion and upgrading of public transport and its effects on pollutant emissions and labour market access (see chapter I); (iv) the impact on the environment and on the incomes of the poorest of programmes on energy efficiency and access to clean energy sources (such as the “Electricity for all” programme in Brazil) and on access to drinking water (such as the “Water for all” programme in Peru) (see chapter I); (v) the impact of family farming policies on the environment and food security (see chapter III). Government budgets should reflect the analytical soundness of these “triple dividend” solutions (improved economic performance, greater social inclusion and enhanced quality of life, and reduced environmental impact of production activities).

233<br />

B. GUIDELINES FOR THE INTEGRATION OF THE THREE PILLARS<br />

OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT<br />

The guidelines proposed below are designed to bring toge<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> envir<strong>on</strong>mental, social and ec<strong>on</strong>omic<br />

dimensi<strong>on</strong>s of <str<strong>on</strong>g>development</str<strong>on</strong>g> by means of instituti<strong>on</strong>al, legal and ec<strong>on</strong>omic instruments, informati<strong>on</strong> and<br />

capacity-building. They do not follow <strong>the</strong> traditi<strong>on</strong>al sector-based approach. Instead <strong>the</strong>y seek to close<br />

persistent gaps in <strong>the</strong> implementati<strong>on</strong> of <str<strong>on</strong>g>sustainable</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>development</str<strong>on</strong>g> by means of cross-cutting proposals that<br />

have an impact in more than <strong>on</strong>e sector. Moreover, although <strong>the</strong> heterogeneity of <strong>the</strong> regi<strong>on</strong> precludes a<br />

blanket approach, <strong>the</strong>se cross-cutting guidelines c<strong>on</strong>cern characteristics generally seen throughout <strong>the</strong> regi<strong>on</strong>.<br />

Certain basic principles underlie <strong>the</strong> guidelines, including respect for human rights and priority<br />

c<strong>on</strong>siderati<strong>on</strong> of <strong>the</strong> interests of groups who are at a potential disadvantage, including women, indigenous<br />

peoples, Afro-descen<strong>da</strong>nts, older pers<strong>on</strong>s, children and pers<strong>on</strong>s with disabilities in relati<strong>on</strong> to<br />

discriminati<strong>on</strong>, poverty, health and socioec<strong>on</strong>omic inequality (see introductory chapter).<br />

Guideline 1<br />

Create synergies am<strong>on</strong>g inclusi<strong>on</strong>, social protecti<strong>on</strong>, human security, empowerment<br />

of people, disaster risk reducti<strong>on</strong> and envir<strong>on</strong>mental protecti<strong>on</strong><br />

Investment can have a very positive impact <strong>on</strong> both well-being and social inclusi<strong>on</strong>, as well as <strong>on</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> envir<strong>on</strong>ment. In this c<strong>on</strong>text, unmet social demands, such as expanding <strong>the</strong> coverage of basic services,<br />

generating markets for care services (<strong>the</strong> care ec<strong>on</strong>omy) and investment in infrastructure, quality public<br />

transport and services relating to disaster risk reducti<strong>on</strong> can create new sources of ec<strong>on</strong>omic growth,<br />

encourage <strong>the</strong> creati<strong>on</strong> of decent work with a very low —or even positive— envir<strong>on</strong>mental impact and<br />

promote broad social inclusi<strong>on</strong>.<br />

The poor are most likely to bear <strong>the</strong> costs of envir<strong>on</strong>mental degra<strong>da</strong>ti<strong>on</strong>. This creates a vicious<br />

circle as poverty is perpetuated, often over generati<strong>on</strong>s. The cycle can <strong>on</strong>ly be broken by means of<br />

complementary systemic policies tackling: (i) social protecti<strong>on</strong> (in a broad sense, including policies <strong>on</strong><br />

minimum wage, pensi<strong>on</strong>s, access to health care, educati<strong>on</strong> and o<strong>the</strong>r basic services) and envir<strong>on</strong>mental<br />

protecti<strong>on</strong>; and (ii) <strong>the</strong> empowerment of people to increase <strong>the</strong>ir resilience and enable <strong>the</strong>m to develop<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir potential and participate fully in decisi<strong>on</strong>-making.<br />

The human security approach provides a str<strong>on</strong>g policy framework which combines protecti<strong>on</strong> and<br />

empowerment and is based <strong>on</strong> five principles: it is people-centred, multi-dimensi<strong>on</strong>al, comprehensive,<br />

c<strong>on</strong>text-specific and preventi<strong>on</strong>-oriented. 1<br />

The following acti<strong>on</strong>s are suggested under this guideline:<br />

1<br />

See OCHA (<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>09), quoted in UNCRD (<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>10).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!