25.04.2015 Views

sustainable development 20 years on from the ... - José Eli da Veiga

sustainable development 20 years on from the ... - José Eli da Veiga

sustainable development 20 years on from the ... - José Eli da Veiga

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

219<br />

The benefits for envir<strong>on</strong>mental sustainability of a multilateral, regi<strong>on</strong>al or bilateral system of<br />

intellectual-property protecti<strong>on</strong> are not automatic, but will depend <strong>on</strong> a balanced c<strong>on</strong>siderati<strong>on</strong> of<br />

envir<strong>on</strong>mental, social and ec<strong>on</strong>omic interests. In resp<strong>on</strong>se to envir<strong>on</strong>mentally harmful products or<br />

processes, <strong>the</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>development</str<strong>on</strong>g> of more envir<strong>on</strong>mentally benign alternatives will generate corresp<strong>on</strong>ding<br />

intellectual property rights. That is to say, insofar as <strong>the</strong> answer to envir<strong>on</strong>mental problems lies in<br />

technological innovati<strong>on</strong>, <strong>the</strong> current structure of <strong>the</strong> intellectual property regime and internati<strong>on</strong>al trade<br />

rules can provide significant opportunities to innovators, by guaranteeing <strong>the</strong>m <strong>the</strong> right to capture a<br />

proporti<strong>on</strong> of <strong>the</strong> rents arising <strong>from</strong> improved envir<strong>on</strong>mental performance (United Nati<strong>on</strong>s, <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>10b).<br />

N<strong>on</strong>e<strong>the</strong>less, <strong>the</strong> disseminati<strong>on</strong> of new technologies is in practice limited by <strong>the</strong> expanding scope<br />

of <strong>the</strong> internati<strong>on</strong>al intellectual property regime and leng<strong>the</strong>ning of <strong>the</strong> period of protecti<strong>on</strong> specified in<br />

bilateral free-trade agreements <strong>on</strong> this issue. In fact, trade provisi<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> intellectual property restrict<br />

traditi<strong>on</strong>al methods of reverse engineering and o<strong>the</strong>r forms of imitative innovati<strong>on</strong>; restrict excepti<strong>on</strong>s to<br />

patentability, which particularly affects pharmaceutical and food products; and reduces forms of<br />

compulsory licensing (Schaper, <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>07). All of this could obstruct efforts by Latin American and Caribbean<br />

countries to improve <strong>the</strong>ir technological <str<strong>on</strong>g>development</str<strong>on</strong>g> levels, and to modernize and promote a <str<strong>on</strong>g>sustainable</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>development</str<strong>on</strong>g> process. At <strong>the</strong> same time, insofar as some developing countries gradually start to produce<br />

more innovati<strong>on</strong> and scientific research with commercial applicati<strong>on</strong>s, <strong>the</strong>y could also benefit <strong>from</strong> higher<br />

levels of protecti<strong>on</strong> for <strong>the</strong>ir creati<strong>on</strong>s.<br />

At <strong>the</strong> Latin American and Caribbean Regi<strong>on</strong>al Meeting Preparatory to <strong>the</strong> United Nati<strong>on</strong>s<br />

C<strong>on</strong>ference <strong>on</strong> Sustainable Development (Rio+<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>), <strong>the</strong> countries indicated <strong>the</strong> need for commitments to<br />

achieve “effective access to and transfer of safe and appropriate technologies, without c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>alities and<br />

<strong>on</strong> preferential terms for developing countries” and “<strong>the</strong> promoti<strong>on</strong> of a global intellectual property rights<br />

regime that facilitates <strong>the</strong> transfer of such technologies, in keeping with <strong>the</strong> commitments undertaken by<br />

each country” (ECLAC, <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>11b).<br />

C. SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER<br />

After <strong>the</strong> Earth Summit in 1992, <strong>the</strong> World C<strong>on</strong>ference <strong>on</strong> Science (WCS) was held in Bu<strong>da</strong>pest in 1999,<br />

c<strong>on</strong>vened by UNESCO and <strong>the</strong> Internati<strong>on</strong>al Council for Science (ICSU). The two final documents<br />

produced by <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>ference laid foun<strong>da</strong>ti<strong>on</strong>s for formulating a new social c<strong>on</strong>tract for science. First, <strong>the</strong><br />

Declarati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> Science and <strong>the</strong> Use of Scientific Knowledge focuses <strong>on</strong> solving problems within science,<br />

technology and society. Sec<strong>on</strong>d, <strong>the</strong> Science Agen<strong>da</strong>: Framework for Acti<strong>on</strong> is a guide to promoting joint<br />

activities in science and technology to fur<strong>the</strong>r <str<strong>on</strong>g>sustainable</str<strong>on</strong>g> human <str<strong>on</strong>g>development</str<strong>on</strong>g>, in harm<strong>on</strong>y with <strong>the</strong> natural<br />

envir<strong>on</strong>ment. Both documents were adopted by c<strong>on</strong>sensus am<strong>on</strong>g all participants at <strong>the</strong> World Science<br />

C<strong>on</strong>ference, and also by <strong>the</strong> General C<strong>on</strong>ference of UNESCO and <strong>the</strong> Internati<strong>on</strong>al Council for Science.<br />

Participati<strong>on</strong> by Latin American and Caribbean countries in <strong>the</strong> World C<strong>on</strong>ference <strong>on</strong> Science<br />

was based <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> Santo Domingo Declarati<strong>on</strong>: Science for <strong>the</strong> Twenty-first Century: A New Visi<strong>on</strong> and a<br />

Framework for Acti<strong>on</strong> (UNESCO, 1999). This stated <strong>the</strong> need to streng<strong>the</strong>n support for science and<br />

technology; break down barriers between <strong>the</strong> natural sciences and social science; and improve educati<strong>on</strong><br />

<strong>on</strong> science and technology to integrate <strong>the</strong>m into general culture and streng<strong>the</strong>n internati<strong>on</strong>al scientific<br />

cooperati<strong>on</strong>. The Declarati<strong>on</strong> explicitly states <strong>the</strong> need to formulate a new social c<strong>on</strong>tract for science<br />

and technology. 15<br />

15<br />

See <strong>the</strong> Santo Domingo Declarati<strong>on</strong> [<strong>on</strong>line] http://www.unesco.org/science/wcs/meetings/lac_santo_domingo_s_99.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!