sustainable development 20 years on from the ... - José Eli da Veiga

sustainable development 20 years on from the ... - José Eli da Veiga sustainable development 20 years on from the ... - José Eli da Veiga

25.04.2015 Views

215 4. The Doha Round and ong>sustainableong> ong>developmentong> The Doha Round of trade talks in the framework of WTO, launched in November ong>20ong>01, represents the main effort so far to incorporate the dimension of ong>sustainableong> ong>developmentong> into the agenda of the multilateral trading system. Paragraph 6 of the Doha Ministerial Declaration states that “the aims of upholding and safeguarding an open and non-discriminatory multilateral trading system, and acting for the protection of the environment and the promotion of ong>sustainableong> ong>developmentong> can and must be mutually supportive.” The Doha Round reaffirms the right of all countries to adopt measures to protect human, animal or plant life or health, or the environment at the levels it considers appropriate —provided they are not applied in a manner which would constitute a means of arbitrary or unjustifiable discrimination between countries where the same conditions prevail, or as a disguised restriction on international trade, and are otherwise in accordance with the provisions of the WTO Agreements (WTO, ong>20ong>01). The Doha Round has the potential to achieve results that promote ong>sustainableong> ong>developmentong> in various fields. The Doha Round negotiating agenda links several issues to ong>sustainableong> ong>developmentong>. One of these is agriculture, where: (i) agreement in principle has been reached to phase out all forms of export subsidies (which for manufactured products have been banned since 1958); (ii) substantial reductions are expected to be achieved in authorized trade-distorting domestic support granted by industrialized countries; and (iii) also substantial reductions are expected to be achieved in market access barriers, through a formula whereby the highest tariffs have to be cut most in percentage terms. This would benefit developing countries by enabling them to take better advantage of their comparative advantages in agriculture; and it would promote ong>sustainableong> ong>developmentong> by reducing the environmental costs associated with overproduction in industrialized countries. Secondly, the agenda includes specific negotiations on trade and the environment, focusing on three issues: (i) reducing (or eventually eliminating) barriers to trade in environmental goods and services; (ii) clarifying the relation between WTO regulations and multilateral agreements on the environment, particularly those that contain “specific trade obligations”; and (iii) strengthening cooperation between the WTO Secretariat and the secretariats of multilateral environmental agreements. Thus far, WTO members have not reached consensus on the range of products for which tariff and non-tariff barriers should be reduced. Part of the reason for this is the lack of a universally accepted definition of “environmental good”. Nonetheless, the main reason is the apparent conflict between the different interests at stake. Industrialized countries, which are currently the main producers of environmental technologies, are striving for the most ambitious outcome possible, to thus maximize their export opportunities; while a large number of developing countries are seeking to promote their capacity to produce these technologies locally, so they are reluctant to reduce their import barriers. 10 The Doha Round also includes negotiations on fishery subsidies. According to World Bank estimates, in ong>20ong>00, about US$ 10 billion were disbursed worldwide in subsidies to increase the catch capacity of fishing fleets; about 80% of that amount was granted to industrialized countries (FAO/World Bank, ong>20ong>08). Their main beneficiaries are the European Union and a number of Asian economies, particularly Japan, the Republic of Korea and Taiwan Province of China. Of all subsidies, the most important were on fuel (63.5%) and for the construction, renewal and modernization of fishing fleets 10 Compounding this is the fact that the willingness of certain developing countries to lower tariffs on environmental goods and services will depend heavily on the gains they perceive in other areas of priority interest within the Doha Round, such as agriculture.

216 (18.9%). 11 Fishery subsidies have contributed to an excess fishing capacity in the world, which has led in turn to overfishing. In this context, the ongoing Doha negotiations have given majority support to prohibiting certain forms of subsidy that promote excess capacity and consequent overfishing, as well as ensuring special and differential, appropriate and effective, treatment, for developing and least developed countries. The latter is important, given the importance of fisheries, including small-scale non-industrial fishing, as a source of employment and means of subsistence in many developing countries. There are several issues that have important implications for ong>sustainableong> ong>developmentong> in the next few ong>yearsong>. These include the treatment of fossil-fuel subsidies; prohibitions and restrictions on exports of agricultural products and other raw materials; and the different policy instruments that countries and firms can use to combat climate change which have an impact on trade. 5. Negotiations on climate change and international trade The ongoing negotiations within the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), aim to define a new regime for reducing greenhouse gases (GHGs) when the first period of implementation of the Kyoto Protocol expires in ong>20ong>12. As industrialized and developing countries approach the issue of climate change from different standpoints, there are major difficulties in the negotiations. It is a challenge to secure effective commitments from all of the members of the Convention that take their special situations into account by granting special and differential treatment, including appropriate and timely access to financial and technological resources to enable them to contribute to the reduction of global warming, without compromising their ong>developmentong> strategies, and without suffering the effects of environmental protection policies based on protectionist elements. 12 In relation to international trade, the current UNFCCC negotiations aim to define clear policies that are consistent with the basic principles of international trade, in particular non-discrimination. As mitigation and adaptation measures would be applied in sectors open to international trade, the rules of the multilateral trading system will need to be adjusted; and this will generate tensions between the rules of the multilateral trading system and climate change mitigation measures that have an impact on trade —for example, “production and processing methods” (PPMs) and the implementation of trade measures based on a product’s carbon footprint. 13 Latin American and Caribbean exports would be vulnerable to adaptation and mitigation measures adopted in industrialized countries if they included trade restrictions, owing to the distances and prevailing export structure with industries that make intensive use of energy and capital and are highly polluting. Up to 17% of the region’s exports consist of products considered “environmentally sensitive”, such as commodities and natural resource-based manufactures, 14 which have a greater impact on the 11 12 13 14 According to WTO estimates, these subsidies fluctuate between US$ 14 billion and US$ ong>20ong>.5 billion per year (WTO, ong>20ong>11). OECD countries currently emit 77% of total GHGs, but emissions by developing countries are growing. For example, it is forecast that, for the period ong>20ong>05 to ong>20ong>30, while the volumes of greenhouse gases emitted by OECD countries will grow by an annual average of 0.5%, emissions by developing countries are expected to increase by 2.5% per year (WTO/UNEP, ong>20ong>09). Current GATT regulations (which mostly date back to the late 1940s) and those of the WTO, were not designed to address problems related to climate change (Low, Marceau and Reinaud, ong>20ong>11). Environmentally sensitive industries (ESIs) —a classification used in some studies— are defined as: (a) those that have spent most on controlling and reducing pollution; and (b) those with the highest intensities of emissions into different media (air, water, soil). There are 40 industries (Standard International Trade Classification (SITC)

215<br />

4. The Doha Round and <str<strong>on</strong>g>sustainable</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>development</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

The Doha Round of trade talks in <strong>the</strong> framework of WTO, launched in November <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>01, represents <strong>the</strong><br />

main effort so far to incorporate <strong>the</strong> dimensi<strong>on</strong> of <str<strong>on</strong>g>sustainable</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>development</str<strong>on</strong>g> into <strong>the</strong> agen<strong>da</strong> of <strong>the</strong><br />

multilateral trading system. Paragraph 6 of <strong>the</strong> Doha Ministerial Declarati<strong>on</strong> states that “<strong>the</strong> aims of<br />

upholding and safeguarding an open and n<strong>on</strong>-discriminatory multilateral trading system, and acting for <strong>the</strong><br />

protecti<strong>on</strong> of <strong>the</strong> envir<strong>on</strong>ment and <strong>the</strong> promoti<strong>on</strong> of <str<strong>on</strong>g>sustainable</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>development</str<strong>on</strong>g> can and must be mutually<br />

supportive.” The Doha Round reaffirms <strong>the</strong> right of all countries to adopt measures to protect human,<br />

animal or plant life or health, or <strong>the</strong> envir<strong>on</strong>ment at <strong>the</strong> levels it c<strong>on</strong>siders appropriate —provided <strong>the</strong>y are<br />

not applied in a manner which would c<strong>on</strong>stitute a means of arbitrary or unjustifiable discriminati<strong>on</strong><br />

between countries where <strong>the</strong> same c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s prevail, or as a disguised restricti<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> internati<strong>on</strong>al trade,<br />

and are o<strong>the</strong>rwise in accor<strong>da</strong>nce with <strong>the</strong> provisi<strong>on</strong>s of <strong>the</strong> WTO Agreements (WTO, <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>01).<br />

The Doha Round has <strong>the</strong> potential to achieve results that promote <str<strong>on</strong>g>sustainable</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>development</str<strong>on</strong>g> in<br />

various fields. The Doha Round negotiating agen<strong>da</strong> links several issues to <str<strong>on</strong>g>sustainable</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>development</str<strong>on</strong>g>. One<br />

of <strong>the</strong>se is agriculture, where: (i) agreement in principle has been reached to phase out all forms of export<br />

subsidies (which for manufactured products have been banned since 1958); (ii) substantial reducti<strong>on</strong>s are<br />

expected to be achieved in authorized trade-distorting domestic support granted by industrialized<br />

countries; and (iii) also substantial reducti<strong>on</strong>s are expected to be achieved in market access barriers,<br />

through a formula whereby <strong>the</strong> highest tariffs have to be cut most in percentage terms. This would benefit<br />

developing countries by enabling <strong>the</strong>m to take better advantage of <strong>the</strong>ir comparative advantages in<br />

agriculture; and it would promote <str<strong>on</strong>g>sustainable</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>development</str<strong>on</strong>g> by reducing <strong>the</strong> envir<strong>on</strong>mental costs<br />

associated with overproducti<strong>on</strong> in industrialized countries.<br />

Sec<strong>on</strong>dly, <strong>the</strong> agen<strong>da</strong> includes specific negotiati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> trade and <strong>the</strong> envir<strong>on</strong>ment, focusing <strong>on</strong><br />

three issues: (i) reducing (or eventually eliminating) barriers to trade in envir<strong>on</strong>mental goods and services;<br />

(ii) clarifying <strong>the</strong> relati<strong>on</strong> between WTO regulati<strong>on</strong>s and multilateral agreements <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> envir<strong>on</strong>ment,<br />

particularly those that c<strong>on</strong>tain “specific trade obligati<strong>on</strong>s”; and (iii) streng<strong>the</strong>ning cooperati<strong>on</strong> between <strong>the</strong><br />

WTO Secretariat and <strong>the</strong> secretariats of multilateral envir<strong>on</strong>mental agreements.<br />

Thus far, WTO members have not reached c<strong>on</strong>sensus <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> range of products for which tariff<br />

and n<strong>on</strong>-tariff barriers should be reduced. Part of <strong>the</strong> reas<strong>on</strong> for this is <strong>the</strong> lack of a universally accepted<br />

definiti<strong>on</strong> of “envir<strong>on</strong>mental good”. N<strong>on</strong>e<strong>the</strong>less, <strong>the</strong> main reas<strong>on</strong> is <strong>the</strong> apparent c<strong>on</strong>flict between <strong>the</strong><br />

different interests at stake. Industrialized countries, which are currently <strong>the</strong> main producers of<br />

envir<strong>on</strong>mental technologies, are striving for <strong>the</strong> most ambitious outcome possible, to thus maximize <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

export opportunities; while a large number of developing countries are seeking to promote <strong>the</strong>ir capacity<br />

to produce <strong>the</strong>se technologies locally, so <strong>the</strong>y are reluctant to reduce <strong>the</strong>ir import barriers. 10<br />

The Doha Round also includes negotiati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> fishery subsidies. According to World Bank<br />

estimates, in <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>00, about US$ 10 billi<strong>on</strong> were disbursed worldwide in subsidies to increase <strong>the</strong> catch<br />

capacity of fishing fleets; about 80% of that amount was granted to industrialized countries (FAO/World<br />

Bank, <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>08). Their main beneficiaries are <strong>the</strong> European Uni<strong>on</strong> and a number of Asian ec<strong>on</strong>omies,<br />

particularly Japan, <strong>the</strong> Republic of Korea and Taiwan Province of China. Of all subsidies, <strong>the</strong> most<br />

important were <strong>on</strong> fuel (63.5%) and for <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong>, renewal and modernizati<strong>on</strong> of fishing fleets<br />

10<br />

Compounding this is <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong> willingness of certain developing countries to lower tariffs <strong>on</strong><br />

envir<strong>on</strong>mental goods and services will depend heavily <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> gains <strong>the</strong>y perceive in o<strong>the</strong>r areas of priority<br />

interest within <strong>the</strong> Doha Round, such as agriculture.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!