sustainable development 20 years on from the ... - José Eli da Veiga
sustainable development 20 years on from the ... - José Eli da Veiga
sustainable development 20 years on from the ... - José Eli da Veiga
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
214<br />
2. Agricultural subsidies<br />
Most agricultural subsidies in industrialized countries are price-support programmes and payments related to<br />
output levels or <strong>the</strong> use of certain inputs. All subsidies of this type generate incentives for <strong>the</strong> overproducti<strong>on</strong><br />
of various crops, pushing down <strong>the</strong>ir internati<strong>on</strong>al prices and making it more difficult for farmers in<br />
developing countries to compete. For that reas<strong>on</strong>, <strong>the</strong> World Trade Organizati<strong>on</strong> (WTO) c<strong>on</strong>siders <strong>the</strong>m trade<br />
distorting, and <strong>the</strong>ir reducti<strong>on</strong> is currently being negotiated in <strong>the</strong> framework of <strong>the</strong> Doha Round (see secti<strong>on</strong><br />
4). The total assistance granted by developed countries to <strong>the</strong> agriculture sector, including protecti<strong>on</strong> through<br />
tariffs, quotas and o<strong>the</strong>r barriers declined <strong>from</strong> 1.2% of GDP in <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>00 to 0.9% of GDP in <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>09. N<strong>on</strong>e<strong>the</strong>less,<br />
this assistance remains at high levels, worth over US$ 350 billi<strong>on</strong> per year since <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>04, and in <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>09<br />
represented three times <strong>the</strong> total amount of <str<strong>on</strong>g>development</str<strong>on</strong>g> assistance provided by those same countries.<br />
Apart <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir impact <strong>on</strong> agricultural trade, subsidies linked to prices, output levels and input<br />
use have been classified by <strong>the</strong> OECD as having <strong>the</strong> greatest negative impact <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> envir<strong>on</strong>ment, am<strong>on</strong>g<br />
<strong>the</strong> different types of agricultural subsidy (OECD, <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>02). Such impacts can occur through various<br />
channels, including: incentives for greater use of fertilizers and pesticides, with c<strong>on</strong>sequent <strong>da</strong>mage to<br />
soils and water; <strong>the</strong> incorporati<strong>on</strong> of land that could be used for c<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> purposes into cultivati<strong>on</strong><br />
areas, and reducti<strong>on</strong>s in biodiversity stemming <strong>from</strong> subsidies to plant certain crops ra<strong>the</strong>r than o<strong>the</strong>rs that<br />
do not receive subsidies.<br />
A reducti<strong>on</strong> of distorting agricultural subsidies in industrialized countries would create a more<br />
level playing field for developing-country producers, and reduce incentives for overproducti<strong>on</strong> in <strong>the</strong><br />
industrialized countries <strong>the</strong>mselves, with c<strong>on</strong>sequent envir<strong>on</strong>mental benefits for <strong>the</strong>m. It is harder to<br />
predict <strong>the</strong> envir<strong>on</strong>mental effect of such reducti<strong>on</strong>s in developing countries. The net impact <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
envir<strong>on</strong>ment will be different in each country, depending <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> individual impacts of <strong>the</strong> expansi<strong>on</strong> of<br />
certain crops and <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>tracti<strong>on</strong> of o<strong>the</strong>rs, in resp<strong>on</strong>se to new price signals generated by a reducti<strong>on</strong> of<br />
subsidies in industrialized countries. In this c<strong>on</strong>text, it becomes extremely important for developing<br />
countries to implement nati<strong>on</strong>al agricultural sustainability programmes, irrespective of <strong>the</strong> outcome of <strong>the</strong><br />
current negotiati<strong>on</strong>s in <strong>the</strong> WTO (La Vina and o<strong>the</strong>rs, <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>06).<br />
3. Aid for trade<br />
Latin American and Caribbean countries still face significant internal c<strong>on</strong>straints that prevent <strong>the</strong>m <strong>from</strong><br />
participating more competitively in internati<strong>on</strong>al trade flows. These include <strong>the</strong> following: lack of<br />
informati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> trade opportunities; excessive export/import formalities; inadequate financing for SMEs<br />
and infrastructure problems. It is <strong>the</strong>refore very important for <strong>the</strong> regi<strong>on</strong> to fully exploit <strong>the</strong> opportunities<br />
provided by aid for trade, such as those of <strong>the</strong> Aid for Trade Initiative launched during <strong>the</strong> Ministerial<br />
C<strong>on</strong>ference of WTO in H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g (Special Administrative Regi<strong>on</strong> of China) in December <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>05.<br />
(OECD/WTO, <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>10). N<strong>on</strong>e<strong>the</strong>less, <strong>the</strong> regi<strong>on</strong> receives a small proporti<strong>on</strong> of aid-for-trade flows: roughly<br />
7%, which never<strong>the</strong>less accounts for slightly more than a fifth of <strong>the</strong> ODA flowing into Latin America<br />
and <strong>the</strong> Caribbean during <strong>the</strong> sec<strong>on</strong>d half of <strong>the</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>00s.<br />
The countries of <strong>the</strong> regi<strong>on</strong> could increase <strong>the</strong>ir share of aid-for-trade flows by defining priorities,<br />
and identifying and presenting relevant projects that enable <strong>the</strong>m to obtain new resource flows, in<br />
accor<strong>da</strong>nce with <strong>the</strong> principles of additi<strong>on</strong>ality, sustainability and aid effectiveness. In additi<strong>on</strong>, priority<br />
should be given to securing funds for projects that involve several countries and include a clear tradefacilitati<strong>on</strong><br />
comp<strong>on</strong>ent. A greater flow of funds to <strong>the</strong> regi<strong>on</strong> could not <strong>on</strong>ly help improve its internati<strong>on</strong>al<br />
participati<strong>on</strong> but also c<strong>on</strong>tribute to its <str<strong>on</strong>g>sustainable</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>development</str<strong>on</strong>g> by incorporating specific acti<strong>on</strong>s.