sustainable development 20 years on from the ... - José Eli da Veiga
sustainable development 20 years on from the ... - José Eli da Veiga
sustainable development 20 years on from the ... - José Eli da Veiga
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
213<br />
The high proporti<strong>on</strong> of Latin American and Caribbean exports entering developed-country<br />
markets duty-free mainly reflects <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong> main products exported by <strong>the</strong> regi<strong>on</strong> to those countries<br />
are raw materials or natural resource-based manufactures, although <strong>the</strong>re are pockets of protecti<strong>on</strong> in<br />
sectors of special interest for <strong>the</strong> regi<strong>on</strong>. Since <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>00, preferential tariffs have trended downwards more<br />
sharply in all of <strong>the</strong>se sectors, partly owing to <strong>the</strong> trade agreements signed between developed and<br />
developing countries (see figure V.8).<br />
Figure V.8<br />
LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN (SELECTED COUNTRIES): AGRICULTURAL,<br />
TEXTILE AND CLOTHING PRODUCTS SUBJECT TO AVERAGE CUSTOMS DUTIES,<br />
MOST-FAVOURED-NATION (MFN) TREATMENT AND PREFERENTIAL TARIFFS<br />
APPLIED BY DEVELOPED COUNTRIES, 1996-<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>08<br />
(Percentages)<br />
A. Agricultural products B. Textiles and clothing<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
14<br />
12<br />
15<br />
10<br />
10<br />
8<br />
6<br />
5<br />
4<br />
2<br />
0<br />
0<br />
1996<br />
1997<br />
1998<br />
1999<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>00<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>01<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>02<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>03<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>04<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>05<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>06<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>07<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>08<br />
1996<br />
1997<br />
1998<br />
1999<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>00<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>01<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>02<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>03<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>04<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>05<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>06<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>07<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>08<br />
Developing countries<br />
(MFN)<br />
Developing countries<br />
(preferential)<br />
Latin America and<br />
<strong>the</strong> Caribbean (MFN)<br />
Latin America and<br />
<strong>the</strong> Caribbean (preferential)<br />
Source: Ec<strong>on</strong>omic Commissi<strong>on</strong> for Latin America and <strong>the</strong> Caribbean (ECLAC), <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> basis of figures <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> Internati<strong>on</strong>al<br />
Trade Centre (ICT)/United Nati<strong>on</strong>s C<strong>on</strong>ference <strong>on</strong> Trade and Development (UNCTAD)/World Trade Organizati<strong>on</strong><br />
(WTO) <strong>da</strong>tabase [<strong>on</strong>line] http://www.mdg-trade.org.<br />
Comparing <strong>the</strong> situati<strong>on</strong> of <strong>the</strong> regi<strong>on</strong> with that of developing countries as a whole, average tariffs<br />
are very similar in <strong>the</strong> case of agriculture, (see figure V.8). In c<strong>on</strong>trast, <strong>the</strong> regi<strong>on</strong> has a much greater<br />
margin of preference than developing countries generally in <strong>the</strong> case of textile products and garments.<br />
This is because <strong>the</strong> latter group includes major exporters in those sectors, mainly Asian countries (for<br />
example China, India, Pakistan and Ind<strong>on</strong>esia). As exports <strong>from</strong> those countries represent direct<br />
competiti<strong>on</strong> in certain segments (generally those of lesser value-added) of <strong>the</strong> textile and garment<br />
industries in industrialized countries, <strong>the</strong>y face higher tariffs than Latin America and <strong>the</strong> Caribbean in<br />
those markets.<br />
The regi<strong>on</strong> still relies <strong>on</strong> a small group of products as a stable source of export earnings, and thus<br />
faces <strong>the</strong> challenge of developing a l<strong>on</strong>g-term strategy to diversify both its export basket and<br />
destinati<strong>on</strong> markets, to reduce dependency <strong>on</strong>, and vulnerability to, fluctuating export earnings<br />
(ECLAC/FAO/IICA, <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>10).