sustainable development 20 years on from the ... - José Eli da Veiga
sustainable development 20 years on from the ... - José Eli da Veiga
sustainable development 20 years on from the ... - José Eli da Veiga
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
210<br />
Innovative financing mechanisms for <str<strong>on</strong>g>sustainable</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>development</str<strong>on</strong>g> currently include <strong>the</strong> following:<br />
rents and special drawing rights associated with climate-change mitigati<strong>on</strong>; taxes <strong>on</strong> m<strong>on</strong>etary<br />
transacti<strong>on</strong>s; aucti<strong>on</strong>s of emissi<strong>on</strong> rights, and carb<strong>on</strong> taxes.<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r current mechanisms include <strong>the</strong> Clean Development Mechanism (CDM); <strong>the</strong> Climate<br />
Change A<strong>da</strong>ptati<strong>on</strong> Fund; payment for envir<strong>on</strong>mental services and, in general, trust funds, such as <strong>the</strong><br />
REDD Investment Fund of Guyana; <strong>the</strong> Green B<strong>on</strong>d (B<strong>on</strong>o Verde) of Costa Rica; <strong>the</strong> Nati<strong>on</strong>al Climate<br />
Change Fund of Brazil; and <strong>the</strong> Yasuni ITT Trust Fund of Ecuador.<br />
Mechanisms specifically associated with <strong>the</strong> health sector also include <strong>the</strong> Internati<strong>on</strong>al Drug<br />
Purchase Facility (UNITAID) (an air ticket soli<strong>da</strong>rity c<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong>); <strong>the</strong> Global Fund to Fight AIDS,<br />
Tuberculosis and Malaria (GF); <strong>the</strong> Internati<strong>on</strong>al Finance Facility for Immunizati<strong>on</strong> (IFFIm); <strong>the</strong> advance<br />
market commitment; and <strong>the</strong> Debt2Health initiative.<br />
6. Emerging cooperati<strong>on</strong> and South-South financing<br />
South-south cooperati<strong>on</strong> is <strong>on</strong>e of <strong>the</strong> most attractive features of <strong>the</strong> recent trend in mobilizing possible<br />
funds to adopt <str<strong>on</strong>g>sustainable</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>development</str<strong>on</strong>g> paths.<br />
This type of cooperati<strong>on</strong> is steadily growing in importance although it does not yet account for<br />
10% of global assistance flows (United Nati<strong>on</strong>s, <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>11). It differs <strong>from</strong> traditi<strong>on</strong>al <str<strong>on</strong>g>development</str<strong>on</strong>g> assistance<br />
channels in that it has no political c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>alities, establishes horiz<strong>on</strong>tal linkages and, frequently, has a<br />
high level of complementarity between <strong>the</strong> cooperating parties.<br />
Over 90% of south-south cooperati<strong>on</strong> still targets project financing, although budgetary support<br />
and debt sterilizati<strong>on</strong> are starting to account for an increasing share of <strong>the</strong> total. There are also<br />
philanthropic activities, aimed mainly at social and rural <str<strong>on</strong>g>development</str<strong>on</strong>g> and micro-financing. Technical<br />
cooperati<strong>on</strong> is also gaining ground, as is humanitarian assistance, which is starting to expand rapidly.<br />
7. Remittances<br />
Remittances are a major source of financing in <strong>the</strong> regi<strong>on</strong> (see map V.1), and are essential for <strong>the</strong> most<br />
deprived domestic ec<strong>on</strong>omies. In <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>10, total remittances stabilized at US$ 58.9 billi<strong>on</strong>, after falling<br />
sharply in <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>09 in <strong>the</strong> wake of <strong>the</strong> crisis that erupted in late <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>08 and affected <strong>the</strong> main countries that host<br />
Latin American emigrants (Hall, <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>10). This episode put a brake <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>tinuous growth of remittance<br />
flows over <strong>the</strong> last decade, which had increased <strong>from</strong> US$ 23.4 billi<strong>on</strong> in <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>01, in o<strong>the</strong>r words four times<br />
<strong>the</strong> amount of net ODA received by <strong>the</strong> regi<strong>on</strong> in that year, to a maximum of US$ 69.2 billi<strong>on</strong> in <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>08,<br />
equivalent to 7½ times ODA received.<br />
At <strong>the</strong> present time, <strong>the</strong> greater difficulty of finding employment and <strong>the</strong> lower wages in migrantreceiving<br />
countries, which affect <strong>the</strong> flow of remittances sent home, has been compounded by currency<br />
appreciati<strong>on</strong>, particularly in relati<strong>on</strong> to <strong>the</strong> dollar, in <strong>the</strong> migrants’ home countries. This is aggravated<br />
fur<strong>the</strong>r by local inflati<strong>on</strong>, which reduces <strong>the</strong> purchasing power of <strong>the</strong> remittances sent to <strong>the</strong> regi<strong>on</strong> still<br />
fur<strong>the</strong>r (Mald<strong>on</strong>ado, Bajuk and Hayem, <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>11). On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, whereas prior to <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>00 <strong>the</strong> average cost<br />
of sending remittances to Latin America and <strong>the</strong> Caribbean was about 15% of <strong>the</strong> value of <strong>the</strong> transacti<strong>on</strong>,<br />
to<strong>da</strong>y it is roughly 5.6% (Hall, <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>10) —a figure which, although it may seem acceptable, amounts to 36%<br />
of <strong>the</strong> ODA received in <strong>the</strong> regi<strong>on</strong> in <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>09.