sustainable development 20 years on from the ... - José Eli da Veiga

sustainable development 20 years on from the ... - José Eli da Veiga sustainable development 20 years on from the ... - José Eli da Veiga

25.04.2015 Views

ong>20ong>5 FDI destination sectors vary depending on the receiving subregion. In South America, the major receiving sectors have been natural resources (essentially, mining and hydrocarbons) and services (see figure V.4). Unlike ong>20ong>05-ong>20ong>09, a growing share of more recent investments is going to the primary sectors. This stands in contrast with Mexico, Central America and the Caribbean, where more of the investments are in manufacturing (whose proportion has increased over the past few ong>yearsong>) and services (ECLAC, ong>20ong>11). Figure V.4 LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN: FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT DESTINATION SECTORS BY SUBREGION, ong>20ong>05-ong>20ong>10 (Percentages) 100 A. South America 80 38 30 60 27 40 29 ong>20ong> 33 43 0 ong>20ong>05 -ong>20ong>09 ong>20ong>10 B. Mexico, Central American Isthmus and the Caribbean 100 80 41 56 60 40 ong>20ong> 35 54 0 9 ong>20ong>05-ong>20ong>09 ong>20ong>10 5 Natural resources Manufacturing Services Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of official figures and estimates.

ong>20ong>6 In addition to their implications in terms of financial flows, the presence of transnational enterprises has an impact on the conditions (technological, management practices and others) under which the economic activity of key sectors unfolds. The relation between FDI and the region’s ong>developmentong> is complex and has both positive and negative aspects. Nonetheless, owing to productive ong>developmentong> patterns in the region (see chapter I), the most salient feature is that, in general, the type of investment undertaken, which also reflects conditions prevailing in the host countries, has not fostered productive linkages or other favourable spillovers that could turn FDI into an engine for more ong>sustainableong> productive ong>developmentong> (see ECLAC, Foreign Direct Investment in Latin America and the Caribbean, several ong>yearsong>). Moreover, sustainability —especially environmental sustainability— has not been a benchmark for strategies to attract and encourage investment. 3. Contributions from international financial institutions and other ong>sustainableong> ong>developmentong> organizations Latin America and the Caribbean has access to a network of regional ong>developmentong> banks committed to promoting environmentally ong>sustainableong> growth and poverty reduction, such as the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB), and to subregional institutions such as the Andean Development Corporation (CAF), the Central American Bank for Economic Integration (CABEI), the Caribbean Development Bank (CDB), and the recently created Bank of the South. National and international ong>developmentong> finance institutions have been weaving the concept of ong>sustainableong> ong>developmentong> into their operations. Financing for climate change mitigation projects has become a priority for multilateral ong>developmentong> banks (MDBs) over the last five y ears, and multilateral financing for these purposes is forecast to grow from US$ 17 billion in ong>20ong>09 to US$ 21 billion in ong>20ong>12. 5 The main international sources of non-loan financing, including for climate change, are the Global Environment Facility (GEF); the Multilateral Fund for the Implementation of the Montreal Protocol, the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) of the Kyoto Protocol of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, and the more recently created Climate Change Adaptation Fund. Between 1991 and ong>20ong>09, Latin America and the Caribbean received about 21% of the roughly US$ 9 billion channelled through the GEF, not counting global projects or those encompassing several regions —with biodiversity the main target sector, followed by climate change. The remainder was destined for transboundary water, land degradation, depletion of the ozone layer, and persistent biological pollutants (GEF, ong>20ong>10). The GEF is responsible, with others, for managing the Special Climate Change Fund (SCCF), which has US$ 218 million (23% of the US$ 128 million in approved projects is allocated to the region), and the Least Developed Countries Fund (LDCF), which has US$ 415 million (the region has only received 5% of the US$ 177 million in approved projects, although the equivalent figure is around 22% in the case of small island States). The Multilateral Fund for the Implementation of the Montreal Protocol, which operates through the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), United Nations Industrial Organization (UNIDO) and the World Bank, has approved investments totalling over US$ 2.8 billion since 1991, and has developed over 6,875 projects, of which about 25% targeted in Latin America and the Caribbean (UNEP, ong>20ong>10b). The Climate Change Adaptation Fund has a target of reaching US$ 100 million by ong>20ong>12, with financing obtained from a 2% levy on the value of certified emission reductions (Climate Change Adaptation Fund, ong>20ong>10). To date, the region has approved projects amounting to US$ 18.6 million. 5 See Climate Funds Update [online]: www.climatefundsupdate.org.

<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>6<br />

In additi<strong>on</strong> to <strong>the</strong>ir implicati<strong>on</strong>s in terms of financial flows, <strong>the</strong> presence of transnati<strong>on</strong>al<br />

enterprises has an impact <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s (technological, management practices and o<strong>the</strong>rs) under which<br />

<strong>the</strong> ec<strong>on</strong>omic activity of key sectors unfolds. The relati<strong>on</strong> between FDI and <strong>the</strong> regi<strong>on</strong>’s <str<strong>on</strong>g>development</str<strong>on</strong>g> is<br />

complex and has both positive and negative aspects. N<strong>on</strong>e<strong>the</strong>less, owing to productive <str<strong>on</strong>g>development</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

patterns in <strong>the</strong> regi<strong>on</strong> (see chapter I), <strong>the</strong> most salient feature is that, in general, <strong>the</strong> type of investment<br />

undertaken, which also reflects c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s prevailing in <strong>the</strong> host countries, has not fostered productive<br />

linkages or o<strong>the</strong>r favourable spillovers that could turn FDI into an engine for more <str<strong>on</strong>g>sustainable</str<strong>on</strong>g> productive<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>development</str<strong>on</strong>g> (see ECLAC, Foreign Direct Investment in Latin America and <strong>the</strong> Caribbean, several<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>years</str<strong>on</strong>g>). Moreover, sustainability —especially envir<strong>on</strong>mental sustainability— has not been a benchmark<br />

for strategies to attract and encourage investment.<br />

3. C<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong>s <strong>from</strong> internati<strong>on</strong>al financial instituti<strong>on</strong>s and o<strong>the</strong>r <str<strong>on</strong>g>sustainable</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>development</str<strong>on</strong>g> organizati<strong>on</strong>s<br />

Latin America and <strong>the</strong> Caribbean has access to a network of regi<strong>on</strong>al <str<strong>on</strong>g>development</str<strong>on</strong>g> banks committed to<br />

promoting envir<strong>on</strong>mentally <str<strong>on</strong>g>sustainable</str<strong>on</strong>g> growth and poverty reducti<strong>on</strong>, such as <strong>the</strong> Inter-American<br />

Development Bank (IDB), and to subregi<strong>on</strong>al instituti<strong>on</strong>s such as <strong>the</strong> Andean Development Corporati<strong>on</strong><br />

(CAF), <strong>the</strong> Central American Bank for Ec<strong>on</strong>omic Integrati<strong>on</strong> (CABEI), <strong>the</strong> Caribbean Development Bank<br />

(CDB), and <strong>the</strong> recently created Bank of <strong>the</strong> South. Nati<strong>on</strong>al and internati<strong>on</strong>al <str<strong>on</strong>g>development</str<strong>on</strong>g> finance<br />

instituti<strong>on</strong>s have been weaving <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>cept of <str<strong>on</strong>g>sustainable</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>development</str<strong>on</strong>g> into <strong>the</strong>ir operati<strong>on</strong>s. Financing<br />

for climate change mitigati<strong>on</strong> projects has become a priority for multilateral <str<strong>on</strong>g>development</str<strong>on</strong>g> banks (MDBs)<br />

over <strong>the</strong> last five y ears, and multilateral financing for <strong>the</strong>se purposes is forecast to grow <strong>from</strong><br />

US$ 17 billi<strong>on</strong> in <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>09 to US$ 21 billi<strong>on</strong> in <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>12. 5<br />

The main internati<strong>on</strong>al sources of n<strong>on</strong>-loan financing, including for climate change, are <strong>the</strong> Global<br />

Envir<strong>on</strong>ment Facility (GEF); <strong>the</strong> Multilateral Fund for <strong>the</strong> Implementati<strong>on</strong> of <strong>the</strong> M<strong>on</strong>treal Protocol, <strong>the</strong><br />

Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) of <strong>the</strong> Kyoto Protocol of <strong>the</strong> United Nati<strong>on</strong>s Framework<br />

C<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> Climate Change, and <strong>the</strong> more recently created Climate Change A<strong>da</strong>ptati<strong>on</strong> Fund.<br />

Between 1991 and <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>09, Latin America and <strong>the</strong> Caribbean received about 21% of <strong>the</strong> roughly<br />

US$ 9 billi<strong>on</strong> channelled through <strong>the</strong> GEF, not counting global projects or those encompassing several<br />

regi<strong>on</strong>s —with biodiversity <strong>the</strong> main target sector, followed by climate change. The remainder was<br />

destined for transboun<strong>da</strong>ry water, land degra<strong>da</strong>ti<strong>on</strong>, depleti<strong>on</strong> of <strong>the</strong> oz<strong>on</strong>e layer, and persistent biological<br />

pollutants (GEF, <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>10). The GEF is resp<strong>on</strong>sible, with o<strong>the</strong>rs, for managing <strong>the</strong> Special Climate Change<br />

Fund (SCCF), which has US$ 218 milli<strong>on</strong> (23% of <strong>the</strong> US$ 128 milli<strong>on</strong> in approved projects is allocated<br />

to <strong>the</strong> regi<strong>on</strong>), and <strong>the</strong> Least Developed Countries Fund (LDCF), which has US$ 415 milli<strong>on</strong> (<strong>the</strong> regi<strong>on</strong><br />

has <strong>on</strong>ly received 5% of <strong>the</strong> US$ 177 milli<strong>on</strong> in approved projects, although <strong>the</strong> equivalent figure is<br />

around 22% in <strong>the</strong> case of small island States).<br />

The Multilateral Fund for <strong>the</strong> Implementati<strong>on</strong> of <strong>the</strong> M<strong>on</strong>treal Protocol, which operates through<br />

<strong>the</strong> United Nati<strong>on</strong>s Envir<strong>on</strong>ment Programme (UNEP), <strong>the</strong> United Nati<strong>on</strong>s Development Programme<br />

(UNDP), United Nati<strong>on</strong>s Industrial Organizati<strong>on</strong> (UNIDO) and <strong>the</strong> World Bank, has approved<br />

investments totalling over US$ 2.8 billi<strong>on</strong> since 1991, and has developed over 6,875 projects, of which<br />

about 25% targeted in Latin America and <strong>the</strong> Caribbean (UNEP, <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>10b). The Climate Change A<strong>da</strong>ptati<strong>on</strong><br />

Fund has a target of reaching US$ 100 milli<strong>on</strong> by <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>12, with financing obtained <strong>from</strong> a 2% levy <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

value of certified emissi<strong>on</strong> reducti<strong>on</strong>s (Climate Change A<strong>da</strong>ptati<strong>on</strong> Fund, <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>10). To <strong>da</strong>te, <strong>the</strong> regi<strong>on</strong> has<br />

approved projects amounting to US$ 18.6 milli<strong>on</strong>.<br />

5<br />

See Climate Funds Up<strong>da</strong>te [<strong>on</strong>line]: www.climatefundsup<strong>da</strong>te.org.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!