sustainable development 20 years on from the ... - José Eli da Veiga
sustainable development 20 years on from the ... - José Eli da Veiga
sustainable development 20 years on from the ... - José Eli da Veiga
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>3<br />
The regi<strong>on</strong>’s lower-middle income countries, which have received large amounts of ODA in<br />
relative terms, include some that are also classified as heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), such as <strong>the</strong><br />
Plurinati<strong>on</strong>al state of Bolivia, Guyana, H<strong>on</strong>duras, Nicaragua, and, more recently, Haiti. This means that,<br />
in some cases, a significant share of <strong>the</strong> ODA received has been in <strong>the</strong> form of acti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir external<br />
debt (forgiveness and o<strong>the</strong>r measures), ra<strong>the</strong>r than “new m<strong>on</strong>ey” targeting o<strong>the</strong>r sectors.<br />
The allocati<strong>on</strong> of ODA has changed in line with <strong>the</strong> Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). In<br />
terms of total assistance, <strong>the</strong>re has been a slight upward trend in amounts targeting <strong>the</strong> social service sectors<br />
and social infrastructure; and <strong>the</strong> preference for grants ra<strong>the</strong>r than loans in total official <str<strong>on</strong>g>development</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
assistance has persisted. General assistance for envir<strong>on</strong>mental protecti<strong>on</strong> in <strong>the</strong> regi<strong>on</strong> remained virtually<br />
unchanged throughout <strong>the</strong> last decade, accounting for about 4% of <strong>the</strong> total (United Nati<strong>on</strong>s, <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>10b).<br />
Using <strong>the</strong> so-called “Rio markers”, which are indicators used to identify official <str<strong>on</strong>g>development</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
assistance activities for meeting <strong>the</strong> goals of <strong>the</strong> three Rio c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>s (<strong>the</strong> United Nati<strong>on</strong>s C<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong><br />
Biological Diversity, <strong>the</strong> United Nati<strong>on</strong>s Framework C<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> Climate Change and <strong>the</strong> United<br />
Nati<strong>on</strong>s C<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong> to Combat Desertificati<strong>on</strong>), shows that <strong>the</strong>re is a rising trend in bilateral<br />
disbursements of assistance, <strong>from</strong> about 2% in <strong>the</strong> middle of <strong>the</strong> decade to levels around 10%, with<br />
positive implicati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> standpoint of those envir<strong>on</strong>mental c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>s.<br />
Against this backdrop, <strong>the</strong> regi<strong>on</strong> is facing <strong>the</strong> challenge of preventing assistance that targets<br />
internati<strong>on</strong>ally-agreed <str<strong>on</strong>g>development</str<strong>on</strong>g> goals, including <strong>the</strong> MDGs, which is still highly necessary, <strong>from</strong><br />
being replaced by assistance aimed at generating global goods and services, in which <strong>the</strong> regi<strong>on</strong> has major<br />
potential as a supplier (for example, activities to mitigate climate change). The latter should be subject to<br />
<strong>the</strong> additi<strong>on</strong>ality commitments of traditi<strong>on</strong>al ODA, since it directly benefits <strong>the</strong> developed countries, in<br />
which, for example, certain mitigati<strong>on</strong> measures could be prioritized as a target for assistance.<br />
2. Private internati<strong>on</strong>al financial flows<br />
Private financial flows have been a fun<strong>da</strong>mental comp<strong>on</strong>ent of total external financing received by Latin<br />
American countries; and, although <strong>the</strong>ir volume has fluctuated, <strong>on</strong> average <strong>the</strong>y have tended to easily<br />
outweigh o<strong>the</strong>r capital flows.<br />
For example, in <strong>the</strong> period 1990-<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>09, net private financial flows entering <strong>the</strong> regi<strong>on</strong> —including<br />
both portfolio investment and foreign direct investment (FDI)— averaged US$ 48.2 billi<strong>on</strong> per year, far<br />
outweighing <strong>the</strong> ODA received by <strong>the</strong> regi<strong>on</strong> in <strong>the</strong> same period, which averaged US$ 6.3 billi<strong>on</strong> per year. 4<br />
Foreign direct investment is an increasingly important comp<strong>on</strong>ent of financial flows for <strong>the</strong><br />
regi<strong>on</strong>, as Latin American and Caribbean have increased <strong>the</strong>ir share as recipients of global FDI (<strong>from</strong> 5%<br />
to 10% over <strong>the</strong> last four <str<strong>on</strong>g>years</str<strong>on</strong>g>) (see figure table V.2). The FDI received by <strong>the</strong> regi<strong>on</strong> increased fivefold<br />
in <strong>the</strong> period 1992-<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>10, growing <strong>from</strong> US$ 12.8 billi<strong>on</strong> to US$ 113 billi<strong>on</strong> (see figure V.3), outpacing<br />
both <strong>the</strong> global average and <strong>the</strong> average of developing countries, but with different subregi<strong>on</strong>al trends<br />
(United Nati<strong>on</strong>s, <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>10b). Flows into South America grew <strong>on</strong> average by 12% per year between 1992 and<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>10, double <strong>the</strong> rate in Mexico, Central America and Caribbean. The leading FDI recipients over <strong>the</strong> last<br />
five <str<strong>on</strong>g>years</str<strong>on</strong>g> have been Brazil, Mexico and Chile; but, in terms of <strong>the</strong> relative weight of <strong>the</strong> recipient<br />
ec<strong>on</strong>omy, foreign investment is more important in <strong>the</strong> Caribbean countries.<br />
4<br />
Data <strong>on</strong> private capital flows are based <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> World Ec<strong>on</strong>omic Outlook (WEO) <strong>da</strong>tabase of <strong>the</strong> Internati<strong>on</strong>al<br />
M<strong>on</strong>etary Fund. ODA figures were obtained <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> OECD statistics system.