sustainable development 20 years on from the ... - José Eli da Veiga

sustainable development 20 years on from the ... - José Eli da Veiga sustainable development 20 years on from the ... - José Eli da Veiga

25.04.2015 Views

ong>20ong>1 Figure V.1 OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE GRANTED BY COUNTRIES OF THE DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE COMMITTEE (DAC), 1990-ong>20ong>10 (Percentages of gross national income of donor countries) 0.7 ODA target ratified in Monterrey: 0.7% of GNI 0.6 Monterrey Conference 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 ong>20ong>00 ong>20ong>01 ong>20ong>02 ong>20ong>03 ong>20ong>04 ong>20ong>05 ong>20ong>06 ong>20ong>07 ong>20ong>08 ong>20ong>09 ong>20ong>10 DAC countries G7 countries Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) statistics, Evolution on official ong>developmentong> assistance (ODA) and World Bank, World Development Indicators for gross national income [date of reference: January ong>20ong>12]. Table V.1 DISBURSEMENTS OF NET OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE (ODA) TO DEVELOPING COUNTRIES AND LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN, 1990-ong>20ong>10 (Millions of dollars at current prices and percentages) 1990 1995 ong>20ong>00 ong>20ong>01 ong>20ong>02 ong>20ong>03 ong>20ong>04 ong>20ong>05 ong>20ong>06 ong>20ong>07 ong>20ong>08 ong>20ong>09 ong>20ong>10 Developing countries 58 548 59 142 49 776 52 388 62 033 71 742 80 121 108 650 107 339 108 494 127 916 126 968 131 087 Latin America and the Caribbean 5 233 6 384 4 838 5 970 5 026 6 129 6 838 6 708 7 340 6 987 9 288 9 022 10 812 Of which Bilateral aid provided by countries of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC) 4 188 4 811 3 858 4 470 3 901 4 580 5 134 4 855 5 276 4 832 7 008 6 573 7 885 Multilateral 1 032 1 543 941 1 469 1 069 1 519 1 685 1 828 2 050 2 109 2 257 2 429 2 895 ODA as a percentage of gross national income (GNI) 0.49 0.37 0.24 0.31 0.29 0.33 0.32 0.26 0.24 0.19 0.22 0.23 0.22 Share of world total 8.9 10.8 9.7 11.4 8.1 8.5 8.5 6.2 6.8 6.4 7.3 7.1 8.2 Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of figures issued by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), OECD Stat database [date of reference: 16 January ong>20ong>12].

ong>20ong>2 This assistance has been distributed unequally between regions and countries. In recent ong>yearsong>, Latin America and the Caribbean, which accounts for approximately 8.5% of the world population and 10% of the population living in developing countries, 3 received about 7% of global ODA. Its share has been shrinking steadily (see figure V.2). 50 Figure V.2 REGIONAL SHARES OF TOTAL NET OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE (ODA), 1990-ong>20ong>10 (Percentages) 45 40 35 30 25 ong>20ong> 15 10 5 0 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 ong>20ong>00 ong>20ong>01 ong>20ong>02 ong>20ong>03 ong>20ong>04 ong>20ong>05 ong>20ong>06 ong>20ong>07 ong>20ong>08 ong>20ong>09 ong>20ong>10 Europe Africa Latin America and the Caribbean Asia Oceanía Developing and unspecified countries Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), OECD.Stat database [date of reference: 16 January ong>20ong>12]. Note: “Developing and unspecified countries” refers to the financing of activities benefiting more than one region. The volume of official assistance received by Latin America and the Caribbean declined from 0.5% of regional GNI in 1990 to just over 0.2% in ong>20ong>10 (see table V.1), representing some US$ 18 per capita. No Latin American or Caribbean country has been among the 10 leading ODA recipients. The distribution of ODA in the region has been similar to the pattern worldwide, so low- and lower-middle income countries have received larger amounts of ODA as a percentage of their income than upper-middle income countries. Haiti, Colombia, Nicaragua and the Plurinational State of Bolivia have been the main recipients of assistance in the region over the last three ong>yearsong>, accounting for 40% of all disbursements. It is important to note that several small island developing states (see chapter IV) are highly vulnerable to extreme climate events that cyclically destabilize the ong>developmentong> path of many of those countries. This is compounded by pressures generated from the small size of their economies, for which reason assistance is crucial for them. In addition, some upper-middle income countries that receive a negligible share of ODA are facing major challenges in terms of persistent inequality and poverty, usually concentrated in certain segments of the population. 3 Data from the United Nations (ong>20ong>11b).

<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>2<br />

This assistance has been distributed unequally between regi<strong>on</strong>s and countries. In recent <str<strong>on</strong>g>years</str<strong>on</strong>g>,<br />

Latin America and <strong>the</strong> Caribbean, which accounts for approximately 8.5% of <strong>the</strong> world populati<strong>on</strong> and<br />

10% of <strong>the</strong> populati<strong>on</strong> living in developing countries, 3 received about 7% of global ODA. Its share has<br />

been shrinking steadily (see figure V.2).<br />

50<br />

Figure V.2<br />

REGIONAL SHARES OF TOTAL NET OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT<br />

ASSISTANCE (ODA), 1990-<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>10<br />

(Percentages)<br />

45<br />

40<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

1990<br />

1991<br />

1992<br />

1993<br />

1994<br />

1995<br />

1996<br />

1997<br />

1998<br />

1999<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>00<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>01<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>02<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>03<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>04<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>05<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>06<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>07<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>08<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>09<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>10<br />

Europe<br />

Africa<br />

Latin America and <strong>the</strong> Caribbean<br />

Asia<br />

Oceanía<br />

Developing and unspecified<br />

countries<br />

Source: Ec<strong>on</strong>omic Commissi<strong>on</strong> for Latin America and <strong>the</strong> Caribbean (ECLAC), <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> basis of Organizati<strong>on</strong> for Ec<strong>on</strong>omic<br />

Cooperati<strong>on</strong> and Development (OECD), OECD.Stat <strong>da</strong>tabase [<strong>da</strong>te of reference: 16 January <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>12].<br />

Note: “Developing and unspecified countries” refers to <strong>the</strong> financing of activities benefiting more than <strong>on</strong>e regi<strong>on</strong>.<br />

The volume of official assistance received by Latin America and <strong>the</strong> Caribbean declined <strong>from</strong> 0.5% of<br />

regi<strong>on</strong>al GNI in 1990 to just over 0.2% in <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>10 (see table V.1), representing some US$ 18 per capita.<br />

No Latin American or Caribbean country has been am<strong>on</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 10 leading ODA recipients. The<br />

distributi<strong>on</strong> of ODA in <strong>the</strong> regi<strong>on</strong> has been similar to <strong>the</strong> pattern worldwide, so low- and lower-middle<br />

income countries have received larger amounts of ODA as a percentage of <strong>the</strong>ir income than upper-middle<br />

income countries. Haiti, Colombia, Nicaragua and <strong>the</strong> Plurinati<strong>on</strong>al State of Bolivia have been <strong>the</strong> main<br />

recipients of assistance in <strong>the</strong> regi<strong>on</strong> over <strong>the</strong> last three <str<strong>on</strong>g>years</str<strong>on</strong>g>, accounting for 40% of all disbursements.<br />

It is important to note that several small island developing states (see chapter IV) are highly<br />

vulnerable to extreme climate events that cyclically destabilize <strong>the</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>development</str<strong>on</strong>g> path of many of those<br />

countries. This is compounded by pressures generated <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> small size of <strong>the</strong>ir ec<strong>on</strong>omies, for which<br />

reas<strong>on</strong> assistance is crucial for <strong>the</strong>m. In additi<strong>on</strong>, some upper-middle income countries that receive a<br />

negligible share of ODA are facing major challenges in terms of persistent inequality and poverty, usually<br />

c<strong>on</strong>centrated in certain segments of <strong>the</strong> populati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

3<br />

Data <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> United Nati<strong>on</strong>s (<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>11b).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!