sustainable development 20 years on from the ... - José Eli da Veiga
sustainable development 20 years on from the ... - José Eli da Veiga sustainable development 20 years on from the ... - José Eli da Veiga
- Page 151 and 152: 150 WHO (World Health Organization)
- Page 153 and 154: 152 1. Statistics and indicators Si
- Page 155 and 156: 154 3. Technology and environmental
- Page 157 and 158: 156 2. Citizen participation in env
- Page 159 and 160: 158 Reforms that would improve acce
- Page 161 and 162: 160 (b) Land ownership Land rights
- Page 163 and 164: 162 Box III.3 LATIN AMERICA AND THE
- Page 165 and 166: 164 Box III.4 LATIN AMERICA AND THE
- Page 167 and 168: 166 Many countries have created ins
- Page 169 and 170: 168 Since 1992, municipalities in L
- Page 171 and 172: 170 requirements of legislation; 14
- Page 173 and 174: 172 8. The science and technology c
- Page 175 and 176: 174 9. Farmers Rural households, in
- Page 177 and 178: 176 Bibliography Acuña, G. (<stron
- Page 179 and 180: 178 Tréllez, E. (20</stron
- Page 181 and 182: 180 A. IMPLEMENTATION OF INTERNATIO
- Page 183 and 184: 182 strategies, develop mechanisms
- Page 185 and 186: 184 participatory process; and nati
- Page 187 and 188: 186 issues, which have been incorpo
- Page 189 and 190: 188 Furthermore, at the internation
- Page 191 and 192: 190 4. Freshwater resources, water
- Page 193 and 194: 192 With respect to coastal and mar
- Page 195 and 196: 194 Further to the issues identifie
- Page 197 and 198: 196 (2006), Challe
- Page 199 and 200: 198 (2010b), Towar
- Page 201: 200 As for financi
- Page 205 and 206: 204 Regions Table
- Page 207 and 208: 206 In addition to
- Page 209 and 210: 208 Figure V.5 LAT
- Page 211 and 212: 210 Innovative financing mechanisms
- Page 213 and 214: 212 8.8 Agricultural support estima
- Page 215 and 216: 214 2. Agricultural subsidies Most
- Page 217 and 218: 216 (18.9%). 11 Fishery subsidies h
- Page 219 and 220: 218 Figure V.9 LATIN AMERICA AND TH
- Page 221 and 222: 220 1. Science and
- Page 223 and 224: 222 Figure V.10 LATIN AMERICA AND T
- Page 225 and 226: 224 2. Scientific capacities and te
- Page 227 and 228: 226 4. Knowledge plurality Rural po
- Page 229 and 230: 228 IDB (Inter-American Development
- Page 232 and 233: 231 Chapter VI GUIDELINES FOR ACHIE
- Page 234 and 235: 233 B. GUIDELINES FOR THE INTEGRATI
- Page 236 and 237: 235 (b) Strengthen policies designe
- Page 238 and 239: 237 from these sectors could suffer
- Page 240 and 241: 239 (f) Send proper signals to esse
- Page 242 and 243: 241 The following actions are sugge
- Page 244 and 245: 243 As part of the preparatory proc
- Page 246 and 247: 245 Indicators can help to raise aw
- Page 248 and 249: 247 All of these initiatives seek t
- Page 250 and 251: 249 (a) Reform curricula to include
<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>2<br />
This assistance has been distributed unequally between regi<strong>on</strong>s and countries. In recent <str<strong>on</strong>g>years</str<strong>on</strong>g>,<br />
Latin America and <strong>the</strong> Caribbean, which accounts for approximately 8.5% of <strong>the</strong> world populati<strong>on</strong> and<br />
10% of <strong>the</strong> populati<strong>on</strong> living in developing countries, 3 received about 7% of global ODA. Its share has<br />
been shrinking steadily (see figure V.2).<br />
50<br />
Figure V.2<br />
REGIONAL SHARES OF TOTAL NET OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT<br />
ASSISTANCE (ODA), 1990-<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>10<br />
(Percentages)<br />
45<br />
40<br />
35<br />
30<br />
25<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
1990<br />
1991<br />
1992<br />
1993<br />
1994<br />
1995<br />
1996<br />
1997<br />
1998<br />
1999<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>00<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>01<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>02<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>03<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>04<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>05<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>06<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>07<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>08<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>09<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>10<br />
Europe<br />
Africa<br />
Latin America and <strong>the</strong> Caribbean<br />
Asia<br />
Oceanía<br />
Developing and unspecified<br />
countries<br />
Source: Ec<strong>on</strong>omic Commissi<strong>on</strong> for Latin America and <strong>the</strong> Caribbean (ECLAC), <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> basis of Organizati<strong>on</strong> for Ec<strong>on</strong>omic<br />
Cooperati<strong>on</strong> and Development (OECD), OECD.Stat <strong>da</strong>tabase [<strong>da</strong>te of reference: 16 January <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>12].<br />
Note: “Developing and unspecified countries” refers to <strong>the</strong> financing of activities benefiting more than <strong>on</strong>e regi<strong>on</strong>.<br />
The volume of official assistance received by Latin America and <strong>the</strong> Caribbean declined <strong>from</strong> 0.5% of<br />
regi<strong>on</strong>al GNI in 1990 to just over 0.2% in <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>10 (see table V.1), representing some US$ 18 per capita.<br />
No Latin American or Caribbean country has been am<strong>on</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 10 leading ODA recipients. The<br />
distributi<strong>on</strong> of ODA in <strong>the</strong> regi<strong>on</strong> has been similar to <strong>the</strong> pattern worldwide, so low- and lower-middle<br />
income countries have received larger amounts of ODA as a percentage of <strong>the</strong>ir income than upper-middle<br />
income countries. Haiti, Colombia, Nicaragua and <strong>the</strong> Plurinati<strong>on</strong>al State of Bolivia have been <strong>the</strong> main<br />
recipients of assistance in <strong>the</strong> regi<strong>on</strong> over <strong>the</strong> last three <str<strong>on</strong>g>years</str<strong>on</strong>g>, accounting for 40% of all disbursements.<br />
It is important to note that several small island developing states (see chapter IV) are highly<br />
vulnerable to extreme climate events that cyclically destabilize <strong>the</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>development</str<strong>on</strong>g> path of many of those<br />
countries. This is compounded by pressures generated <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> small size of <strong>the</strong>ir ec<strong>on</strong>omies, for which<br />
reas<strong>on</strong> assistance is crucial for <strong>the</strong>m. In additi<strong>on</strong>, some upper-middle income countries that receive a<br />
negligible share of ODA are facing major challenges in terms of persistent inequality and poverty, usually<br />
c<strong>on</strong>centrated in certain segments of <strong>the</strong> populati<strong>on</strong>.<br />
3<br />
Data <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> United Nati<strong>on</strong>s (<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>11b).