sustainable development 20 years on from the ... - José Eli da Veiga
sustainable development 20 years on from the ... - José Eli da Veiga
sustainable development 20 years on from the ... - José Eli da Veiga
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
123<br />
Forest cover in Latin America and <strong>the</strong> Caribbean is around 9 milli<strong>on</strong> km 2 , representing roughly<br />
49% of <strong>the</strong> regi<strong>on</strong>’s land area (FAO, <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>10a). Between 1990 and <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>10, <strong>the</strong> regi<strong>on</strong>’s share of global forest<br />
cover fell <strong>from</strong> 25% to 24% (see table II.5). Deforestati<strong>on</strong> in <strong>the</strong> regi<strong>on</strong> during <strong>the</strong> same period accounted<br />
for more than <strong>on</strong>e third of global deforestati<strong>on</strong>. Between <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>00 and <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>10, <strong>the</strong> annual rate of loss was<br />
0.46%, three times <strong>the</strong> global annual rate of 0.13% (FAO, <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>11).<br />
Table II.5<br />
LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN: FOREST AREA AND ANNUAL RATES OF CHANGE,<br />
1990–<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>10, AND PERCENTAGE OF GLOBAL FOREST AREA<br />
Forest area (thousands of hectares)<br />
1990 <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>00 <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>05 <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>10<br />
Thousands<br />
of hectares/<br />
year<br />
Annual rate of change<br />
1990-<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>00 <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>00-<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>05 <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>05-<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>10<br />
%<br />
Thousands<br />
of hectares/<br />
year<br />
%<br />
Thousands<br />
of hectares/<br />
year<br />
%<br />
Caribbean 5 902 6 434 6 728 6 933 53 0.87 59 0.90 41 0.60<br />
Central America 25 717 21 980 <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g> 745 19 499 -374 -1.56 -247 -1.15 -249 -1.23<br />
Mexico 70 291 66 751 65 578 64 802 -354 -0.52 -235 -0.35 -155 -0.24<br />
South America 946 454 904 322 882 258 864 351 -4 213 -0.45 -4 413 -0.49 -3 581 -0.41<br />
World 4 168 399 4 085 168 4 060 964 4 033 060 -8 323 -0.<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g> -4 841 -0.12 -5 581 -0.14<br />
Percentage of global<br />
forest area 25% 24% 24% 24%<br />
Source: Food and Agriculture Organizati<strong>on</strong> of <strong>the</strong> United Nati<strong>on</strong>s (FAO), Forest Resources Assessment <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>10, Rome, <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>10.<br />
The regi<strong>on</strong>al trend in deforestati<strong>on</strong> is determined by <strong>the</strong> trend in South America, where 92% of<br />
<strong>the</strong> regi<strong>on</strong>’s forest area is found, especially Brazil, which is home to 60% of <strong>the</strong> forests in South America<br />
(FAO, <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>11). Between 1990 and <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>05, deforestati<strong>on</strong> rates increased in South America. This upward trend<br />
began to be reversed in <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>05, owing largely to a series of acti<strong>on</strong>s to combat deforestati<strong>on</strong> carried out in<br />
<strong>the</strong> Brazilian Amaz<strong>on</strong> (see box II.6). In Brazil, <strong>the</strong> rate of forest area change was -0.57% in <strong>the</strong> period<br />
<strong>from</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>00 to <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>05 and -0.42% in <strong>the</strong> period <strong>from</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>05 to <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>10. In Mexico, <strong>the</strong> rate was -0.35% in <strong>the</strong><br />
period <strong>from</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>00 to <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>05 and -0.24% in <strong>the</strong> period <strong>from</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>05 to <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>10. In Central America, <strong>the</strong><br />
deforestati<strong>on</strong> rate increased again between <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>05 and <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>10, following a significant downward trend in <strong>the</strong><br />
1990s (FAO, <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>11). In <strong>the</strong> Caribbean, forest area has increased over <strong>the</strong> past <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>years</str<strong>on</strong>g>, mainly as a result<br />
of <strong>the</strong> aband<strong>on</strong>ment of agricultural land (mostly banana-producing areas) (United Nati<strong>on</strong>s, <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>10).<br />
In additi<strong>on</strong> to deforestati<strong>on</strong> rates in <strong>the</strong> regi<strong>on</strong>, forest fragmentati<strong>on</strong> has become a c<strong>on</strong>cern. As<br />
menti<strong>on</strong>ed in <strong>the</strong> previous secti<strong>on</strong>, highly fragmented terrestrial habitats threaten <strong>the</strong> viability of species<br />
and <strong>the</strong>ir ability to a<strong>da</strong>pt to climate change (see previous secti<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> biological corridors).<br />
In <strong>the</strong> regi<strong>on</strong>, more and better informati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> forests now exists, relating not <strong>on</strong>ly to <strong>the</strong> volume<br />
of commercial forest but also to forest services and functi<strong>on</strong>s, extent, designati<strong>on</strong>, characteristics, health<br />
and vitality, biodiversity, producti<strong>on</strong>, protecti<strong>on</strong> and ec<strong>on</strong>omic, legislative and instituti<strong>on</strong>al aspects. This<br />
enables more effective decisi<strong>on</strong>s to be taken <strong>on</strong> how to use and protect forests, how to change policies and<br />
how to improve forest law. Nowa<strong>da</strong>ys <strong>the</strong>re are more trained pers<strong>on</strong>nel and better techniques for forest<br />
management and m<strong>on</strong>itoring. There has been more provisi<strong>on</strong> for community participati<strong>on</strong> since 1992,<br />
which has enabled <strong>the</strong> communities that depend <strong>on</strong> forest resources to dem<strong>on</strong>strate <strong>the</strong>ir skills and<br />
capacity for good forest management. Some States recognize <strong>the</strong> vital role that local communities play in<br />
forest management and <strong>the</strong> importance of sharing resp<strong>on</strong>sibilities. Technological advances in satellite