25.04.2015 Views

sustainable development 20 years on from the ... - José Eli da Veiga

sustainable development 20 years on from the ... - José Eli da Veiga

sustainable development 20 years on from the ... - José Eli da Veiga

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

123<br />

Forest cover in Latin America and <strong>the</strong> Caribbean is around 9 milli<strong>on</strong> km 2 , representing roughly<br />

49% of <strong>the</strong> regi<strong>on</strong>’s land area (FAO, <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>10a). Between 1990 and <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>10, <strong>the</strong> regi<strong>on</strong>’s share of global forest<br />

cover fell <strong>from</strong> 25% to 24% (see table II.5). Deforestati<strong>on</strong> in <strong>the</strong> regi<strong>on</strong> during <strong>the</strong> same period accounted<br />

for more than <strong>on</strong>e third of global deforestati<strong>on</strong>. Between <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>00 and <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>10, <strong>the</strong> annual rate of loss was<br />

0.46%, three times <strong>the</strong> global annual rate of 0.13% (FAO, <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>11).<br />

Table II.5<br />

LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN: FOREST AREA AND ANNUAL RATES OF CHANGE,<br />

1990–<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>10, AND PERCENTAGE OF GLOBAL FOREST AREA<br />

Forest area (thousands of hectares)<br />

1990 <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>00 <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>05 <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>10<br />

Thousands<br />

of hectares/<br />

year<br />

Annual rate of change<br />

1990-<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>00 <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>00-<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>05 <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>05-<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>10<br />

%<br />

Thousands<br />

of hectares/<br />

year<br />

%<br />

Thousands<br />

of hectares/<br />

year<br />

%<br />

Caribbean 5 902 6 434 6 728 6 933 53 0.87 59 0.90 41 0.60<br />

Central America 25 717 21 980 <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g> 745 19 499 -374 -1.56 -247 -1.15 -249 -1.23<br />

Mexico 70 291 66 751 65 578 64 802 -354 -0.52 -235 -0.35 -155 -0.24<br />

South America 946 454 904 322 882 258 864 351 -4 213 -0.45 -4 413 -0.49 -3 581 -0.41<br />

World 4 168 399 4 085 168 4 060 964 4 033 060 -8 323 -0.<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g> -4 841 -0.12 -5 581 -0.14<br />

Percentage of global<br />

forest area 25% 24% 24% 24%<br />

Source: Food and Agriculture Organizati<strong>on</strong> of <strong>the</strong> United Nati<strong>on</strong>s (FAO), Forest Resources Assessment <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>10, Rome, <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>10.<br />

The regi<strong>on</strong>al trend in deforestati<strong>on</strong> is determined by <strong>the</strong> trend in South America, where 92% of<br />

<strong>the</strong> regi<strong>on</strong>’s forest area is found, especially Brazil, which is home to 60% of <strong>the</strong> forests in South America<br />

(FAO, <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>11). Between 1990 and <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>05, deforestati<strong>on</strong> rates increased in South America. This upward trend<br />

began to be reversed in <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>05, owing largely to a series of acti<strong>on</strong>s to combat deforestati<strong>on</strong> carried out in<br />

<strong>the</strong> Brazilian Amaz<strong>on</strong> (see box II.6). In Brazil, <strong>the</strong> rate of forest area change was -0.57% in <strong>the</strong> period<br />

<strong>from</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>00 to <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>05 and -0.42% in <strong>the</strong> period <strong>from</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>05 to <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>10. In Mexico, <strong>the</strong> rate was -0.35% in <strong>the</strong><br />

period <strong>from</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>00 to <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>05 and -0.24% in <strong>the</strong> period <strong>from</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>05 to <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>10. In Central America, <strong>the</strong><br />

deforestati<strong>on</strong> rate increased again between <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>05 and <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>10, following a significant downward trend in <strong>the</strong><br />

1990s (FAO, <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>11). In <strong>the</strong> Caribbean, forest area has increased over <strong>the</strong> past <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>years</str<strong>on</strong>g>, mainly as a result<br />

of <strong>the</strong> aband<strong>on</strong>ment of agricultural land (mostly banana-producing areas) (United Nati<strong>on</strong>s, <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>10).<br />

In additi<strong>on</strong> to deforestati<strong>on</strong> rates in <strong>the</strong> regi<strong>on</strong>, forest fragmentati<strong>on</strong> has become a c<strong>on</strong>cern. As<br />

menti<strong>on</strong>ed in <strong>the</strong> previous secti<strong>on</strong>, highly fragmented terrestrial habitats threaten <strong>the</strong> viability of species<br />

and <strong>the</strong>ir ability to a<strong>da</strong>pt to climate change (see previous secti<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> biological corridors).<br />

In <strong>the</strong> regi<strong>on</strong>, more and better informati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> forests now exists, relating not <strong>on</strong>ly to <strong>the</strong> volume<br />

of commercial forest but also to forest services and functi<strong>on</strong>s, extent, designati<strong>on</strong>, characteristics, health<br />

and vitality, biodiversity, producti<strong>on</strong>, protecti<strong>on</strong> and ec<strong>on</strong>omic, legislative and instituti<strong>on</strong>al aspects. This<br />

enables more effective decisi<strong>on</strong>s to be taken <strong>on</strong> how to use and protect forests, how to change policies and<br />

how to improve forest law. Nowa<strong>da</strong>ys <strong>the</strong>re are more trained pers<strong>on</strong>nel and better techniques for forest<br />

management and m<strong>on</strong>itoring. There has been more provisi<strong>on</strong> for community participati<strong>on</strong> since 1992,<br />

which has enabled <strong>the</strong> communities that depend <strong>on</strong> forest resources to dem<strong>on</strong>strate <strong>the</strong>ir skills and<br />

capacity for good forest management. Some States recognize <strong>the</strong> vital role that local communities play in<br />

forest management and <strong>the</strong> importance of sharing resp<strong>on</strong>sibilities. Technological advances in satellite

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!